A study on earnest money (arras), the penal clause, and the issue of the cumulation of these institutes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2025.83265

Keywords:

Contractual damages, Down payment, Penalty clause

Abstract

The present study aims to contribute to the systematization of the discipline of earnest money (arras) and penalty clause in the context of contractual default. To achieve this goal, a historical, functional, and comparative analysis of both institutes will be conducted. In turn, based on the analysis of the decision issued by the Third Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) in the judgment of Special Appeal (REsp) No. 1.617.652/DF, the possibility of cumulating the studied institutes in the context of contractual damages is verified. Finally, an analysis is made of which of the two figures should prevail in abstract as a penalty to the defaulting debtor, in the case of coexistence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Roberto Alves de Oliveira Filho, Faculdade de Direito de Franca

Doutor em Direito Civil pela Universidade de São Paulo. Mestre em Direito Civil pela Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" - FCHS UNESP Franca. L.L.M. em Direito Civil pela Universidade de São Paulo - FDRP USP. Especialista em Direito Contratual pela Universidade Pontifícia de Salamanca - USAL. Graduado em Direito pela Faculdade de Direito de Franca. Advogado

Published

2026-04-06

How to Cite

Alves de Oliveira Filho, R. (2026). A study on earnest money (arras), the penal clause, and the issue of the cumulation of these institutes. REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS, 18(4), 402–430. https://doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2025.83265

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.