nature gives and nature takes: a qualitative comparison between canadian and german children about their concepts of ‘nature’

Authors

  • parmis aslanimehr University of British Columbia
  • eva marsal University of Education Karlsruhe
  • barbara weber University of British Columbia
  • fabian knapp Realschule Rheinau in Rheinau-Freistett

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2018.30037

Keywords:

philosophy for children, philosophy of nature, environment, canadian- german comparison, philosophical inquiry, community of inquiry

Abstract

As concerns of the Earth heading towards environmental change is gaining more prominence, this article will introduce a pilot study intended to investigate the common ideas children have about nature and how such ideas emerge within a philosophical community of inquiry about nature. We are particularly interested in a cultural comparison between German and Canadian children in order to see if the different historical and cultural developments influence how children understand and feel about nature. This pilot study contributes towards a greater understanding of the cultural differences underlying how children’s perceptions of nature are tied to their identity formation. Furthermore, the process of philosophical inquiry may lend sensitivity to how children reflect and feel as they grow in today’s culture focused on environmental sustainability and economic development.

Author Biographies

parmis aslanimehr, University of British Columbia

Human Development, Learning and Culture, PhD Student

eva marsal, University of Education Karlsruhe

Department of Philosophy, Professor

barbara weber, University of British Columbia

Human Development, Learning and Culture, Professor

Downloads

Published

2018-05-07

How to Cite

aslanimehr, parmis, marsal, eva, weber, barbara, & knapp, fabian. (2018). nature gives and nature takes: a qualitative comparison between canadian and german children about their concepts of ‘nature’. Childhood & Philosophy, 14(30), 483–515. https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2018.30037

Issue

Section

articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)