Ensino da argumentação no discurso: reflexões teórico-propositivas para leitura, produção textual e análise linguística
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/soletras.2025.94349Abstract
In this article, we reflect on the teaching of argumentation in discourse, aiming to discuss how it is possible to work on argumentation in discourse, more closely related to the teaching of reading, textual production, and linguistic analysis. This is a reflective and propositional work, based on Amossy's Theory of Argumentation in Discourse (2018), as well as on the collaborative framework of Brazilian Textual Linguistics by Cavalcante et al. (2020, 2022). More specifically, we will demonstrate how, based on the cartoon genre, it is possible to work on argumentative skills and strategies in the classroom, considering, among other issues, argument reconstruction (Gonçalves-Segundo, 2024), the most frequent argumentative strategies in the genre, and the relationship between doxa, context, and argumentative orientation in texts with an argumentative dimension. We also propose some reading, writing, and linguistic analysis activities that can guide how to work on argumentation in discourse, through the analysis of pedagogical practices that are relevant to teacher training.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The approval of the article implies the immediate and free transfer of the publication rights in this journal. The author (s) authorize the Postgraduate Program in Literature and Linguistics (PPLIN) to reproduce it and publish it in Revista SOLETRAS, understanding the terms "reproduction" and "publication" in accordance with Definition of article 5 of Law 9610/98. The author (s) will continue to own the copyright for subsequent publications. The article can be accessed by the world wide web (http://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/soletras), being allowed, free of charge, the consultation and the reproduction of copy of the article for own use. Cases of plagiarism or any illegalities in the submitted texts are the sole responsibility of their authors.
