Incidência de obstrução em cateteres periféricos intravenosos em adultos e fatores relacionados

Myrna Mayra Bezerra; Luan Ribeiro dos Santos Assis; Viviane da Silva Alves Filgueira; Taciana Fernandes Araújo Ferreira; Renata Karina Reis; Marina Alvina dos Santos; Divanice Contim; Silmara Elaine Malaguti Toffano

doi:10.12957/reuerj.2024.74880

Autores/as

Myrna Mayra Bezerra Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6187-8373
Luan Ribeiro dos Santos Assis Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9840-7575
Viviane da Silva Alves Filgueira Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8669-1233
Taciana Fernandes Araújo Ferreira Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0163-7404
Renata Karina Reis Universidade de São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0681-4721
Marina Alvina dos Santos Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7940-6673
Divanice Contim Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5213-1465
Silmara Elaine Malaguti Toffano Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-9123

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/reuerj.2024.74880

Palabras clave:

Enfermería, Seguridad del Paciente, Cateterismo Periférico, Tiempo de Permanencia, Obstrucción del Catéter

Resumen

Objetivo: analizar la incidencia y los factores relacionados con la obstrucción del catéter intravenoso periférico en adultos hospitalizados. Método: cohorte prospectiva, realizada mediante la observación de 203 catéteres, entre febrero de 2019 y mayo de 2020, en un hospital escuela público brasileño. Se consideraron variables clínicas y del catéter. Los datos se analizaron de forma descriptiva y mediante estadística inferencial. Resultados: el tiempo de permanencia varió entre uno y 15 días y la obstrucción ocurrió en el 7,5% de las observaciones. Hubo mayor riesgo de obstrucción en relación con el sexo (RR=0,49 / p=0,186), la edad (RR=1,20 / p=0,732), los catéteres de mayor calibre (RR=0,53 / p= 0,250), la inserción en el dorso de la mano hasta el antebrazo (RR=2,33/ p=0,114) y el tiempo del catéter in situ (RR=033/ p=0,433). Conclusión: el cuidado diario y la observación del catéter intravenoso periférico son importantes para minimizar la aparición de complicaciones locales y sistémicas y mantener la permeabilidad del dispositivo.

Biografía del autor/a

Myrna Mayra Bezerra, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro

Enfermera. Máster. Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro. Uberaba, Brasil.

Luan Ribeiro dos Santos Assis, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro

Enfermero. Máster. Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro. Uberaba, Brasil.

Viviane da Silva Alves Filgueira, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro

Enfermera. Máster. Estudiante de doctorado. Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro.

Taciana Fernandes Araújo Ferreira, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro

Médica. Máster. Estudiante de doctorado. Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro.

Renata Karina Reis, Universidade de São Paulo

Enfermera. Doctora. Profesora Adjunta. Universidade de São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto, Brasil.

Marina Alvina dos Santos, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul

Enfermera. Doctora. Profesora Adjunta. Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul.Campus Três Lagoas. Três Lagoas, Brasil.

Divanice Contim, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro

Enfermera. Doctora. Profesora Adjunta. Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro. Uberaba, Brasil.

Silmara Elaine Malaguti Toffano, Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro

Enfermera. Profesora Adjunta. Universidade Federal do Triangulo Mineiro. Uberaba, Brasil.

Citas

Gorski LA, Hadaway L, Hagle ME, Broadhurst D, Clare S, Kleidon T, et al. Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 8th edition. J Infus Nurs. 2021 [cited 2023 Mar 02]; 44(1S Suppl 1):S1-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/nan.0000000000000396.

Marsh N, Larsen E, Genzel J, Mihala G, Ullman AJ, Kleidon T, et al. A novel integrated dressing to secure peripheral intravenous catheters in an adult acute hospital: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2018 [cited 2023 Mar 02]; 19(1):596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2985-9.

Marsh N, Webster J, Ullman AJ, Mihala G, Cooke M, Chopra V, et al. Peripheral intravenous catheter non-infectious complications in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2020 [cited 2023 Mar 02]; 76(12):3346-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14565.

Milliani K, Taravella R, Thillard D, Chauvin V, Martin E, Edouard S, et al. Peripheral venous catheterrelated adverse events: evaluation from a multicentre epidemiological study in France (the CATHEVALProject). PLoS One. 2017 [cited 2023 Mar 02]; 12(1):e0168637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168637.

Alexandrou E, Ray-Barruel G, Carr PJ, Frost SA, Inwood S, Higgins N, et al. Use of short peripheral intravenous catheters: characteristics, management, and outcomes worldwide. J Hosp Med. 2018 [cited 2023 Mar 02]; 13(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.3039.

Helm RE, Klausner JD, Klemperer JD, Flint L, Huang EBA. Accepted but unacceptable: peripheral IV catheter failure. J Infus Nurs. 2019 [cited 2023 Apr 05]; 42(3):151-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000326.

Coventry L, Jacob A, Davies H, Stoneman L, Keogh S, Jacob E. Drawing blood from peripheral intravenous cannula compared with venepuncture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2019 [cited 2023 Apr 01]; 75(11):2313-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14078.

Simin D, Milutinović D, Turkulov V, Brkić S. Incidence, severity and risk factors of peripheral intravenous cannula-induced complications: an observational prospective study. J Clin Nurs. 2019 [cited 2023 Mar 28]; 28(10):1585-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14760.

Candadian Vascular Access Association. CCAA Occlusion Management Guideline for. Central Venous Access Devices (CVADs) 2019 Second Edition. 2019; 13(Suppl 1):1-32. Available from: https://www.gavecelt.it/nuovo/sites/default/files/uploads/CVAA%20occlusion%20guidelines%202019.pdf.

Patterson T, Dunsdon J, Slater K, Mcdougall D, Fullerton F. Evaluation of intravenous administration practices, patient safety and expenditure on saline products in a tertiary hospital. J Vasc Access. 2017 [cited 2023 Jan 06]; 3(1):1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.913182.

Ministério da Saúde (Br). Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária-ANVISA. Medidas de prevenção de infecção relacionada à assistência à saúde. Brasília: 2017 [cited 2023 Jan 06], 199p. Available from: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/centraisdeconteudo/publicacoes/servicosdesaude/publicacoes/caderno-4-medidas-de-prevencao-de-infeccao-relacionada-a-assistencia-a-saude.pdf/view

Piper R, Carr PJ, Kelsey LJ, Bulmer AC, Keogh S, Doyle SJ. The mechanistic causes of peripheral intravenous catheter failure based on a parametric computational study. Sci Rep. 2018 [cited 2023 Jan 06]; 8(1):3441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21617-1.

Monteiro DAT, De La Torre-Montero JC, Nicolussi AC, Reis RK, Barbosa MH, Toffano SEM. Prevalence of and factors associated with difficult peripheral venipuncture in adult surgical patients. J Vasc Access. 2020 [cited 2023 Jan 10]; 22(3):404-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1129729820939335

Cuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 [cited 2023 Jan 10]; 13(Suppl 1):S31-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18.

Walker RM, Pires MPO, Ray-Barruel G, Cooke M, Mihala G, Azevedo SS, et al. Peripheral vascular catheter use in Latin America (the vascular study): a multinational cross-sectional study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 [cited 2023 Jan 10]; 9:1039232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1039232.

Fan XW, Xu L, Wei WS, Chen YM, Yang YQ. Relationship between indwelling site and peripheral venous catheter-related complications in adult hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2023 [cited 2023 Jan 16]; 32(7-8):1014-24. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16241.

Braga LM, Parreira PMSD, Arreguy-Sena C, Carlos DM, Mónico LSM, Henriques MAP. Incidence rate and the use of flushing in the prevention of obstructions of the peripheral venous catheter. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2018 [cited 2023 Jan 20]; 27(4):e2810017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072018002810017.

Chen YM, Fan XW, Liu MH, Wang J, Yang YQ, Su YF. Risk factors for peripheral venous catheter failure: A prospective cohort study of 5345 patients. J Vasc Access. 2022 [cited 2023 Jan 19]; 23(6):911-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298211015035.

Murayama R, Uchida M, Oe M, Takahashi T, Oya M, Komiyama C, et al. Removal of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters Due to Catheter Failures Among Adult Patients. J Infus Nurs. 2017 [cited 2023 Dec 06]; 40(4):224-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/nan.0000000000000168.

Santana RCB, Pedreira LC, Guimarães FEO, Almeida LPB, Reis LA, Menezes TMO, et al. Nursing team care actions for safe peripheral intravenous puncture in hospitalized elderly people. REME rev. min. enferm. 2019 [cited 2023 Dec 28]; 40(4):e-1182. Available from: http://www.revenf.bvs.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-27622019000100229&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt

Larsen EN, Marsh N, Mihala G, King M, Zunk M, Ullman AJ, et al. Intravenous antimicrobial administration through peripheral venous catheters - establishing risk profiles from an analysis of 5252 devices. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2022 [cited 2023 Jan 06]; 59(4):106552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2022.106552.

Keogh S, Shelverton C, Flynn J, Davies K, Marsh N, Rickard, CM. An observational study of nurse’s intravenous flush and medication practice in the clinical setting. JVAD. 2017 [cited 2023 Mar 06]; 3(1)1:3-10. Available from: https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.629496319613481.

Estequi JG, Roseira CE, Jesus JB, Figueiredo RM. Boas práticas na manutenção do cateter intravenoso periférico. Enferm Foco. 2020 [cited 2023 Jan 22]; 11(1):10-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21675/2357-707X.2020.v11.n1.2246.