ILLICIT EVIDENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2022.67840Keywords:
illicit evidence, prohibition, fundamental rights, balancing of interestsAbstract
The reconstitution of facts through evidence, an essential requirement for the effectiveness of judicial protection of law (art. 5o, XXXV, of the Federal Constitution), should be as close as possible to the reality of life. Nevertheless, there are more relevant constitutional values that impose limits on the search for the truth, justifying the inadmissibility of illegal evidence (section LVI of article 5 of the Constitution of the Brazilian Republic). In this direction, essentially using the bibliographic review method, the objective of the present text is to address the theme of illegal evidence, presenting guidelines for the admissibility of the evidence in the light of the primacy of fundamental rights, through a balance between the prohibition of illegal evidence and the protection of some fundamental right that is more relevant from a human point of view or public interest, with the application of the principle of proportionality. At the end, an invitation is presented to the application of the guidelines suggested in the resolution of countless situations of the admissibility of evidence involving collision of fundamental rights, as well as the improvement of the subject by the scholars of procedural law, through the re-discussion of the system related to illegal evidence.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Todos os artigos publicados na Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual (REDP) (Departamento de Direito Processual, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) são licenciados por meio de uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais de seu artigo e concordam em licenciar seu trabalho com a licença CC BY 4.0, aceitando assim os termos e condições específicos desta licença disponíveis no seguinte website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
- Os autores concedem à REDP o direito de primeira publicação, de se identificar como publicadora original do trabalho e concedem à revista uma licença de direitos não exclusivos para utilizar o trabalho das seguintes formas: Reproduzir, vender e distribuir cópias eletrônicas ou impressas do manuscrito como um todo, de partes específicas do manuscrito e de suas traduções para qualquer idioma;
- O uso do artigo por terceiros é livre, contanto que a integridade da publicação seja mantida e seus autores originais, periódico de primeira publicação e detalhes de citação sejam identificados.
Dentro dos termos da licença, os autores podem entrar em acordos contratuais adicionais separados para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada do trabalho na revista.
Copyright and Licensing
All articles published in the Procedural Law Electronic Review (REDP) (Department of Procedural Law, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) are licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors retain copyright to their article and agree to license their work under the CC BY 4.0 license, thereby accepting the specific terms and conditions of this license available at the following website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ legal code.
- Authors grant REDP the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher of the work, and grant the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: Reproduce, sell and distribute electronic or printed copies of the manuscript as a whole, of specific parts of the manuscript and its translations into any language;
- Use of the article by third parties is free, as long as the integrity of the publication is maintained and its original authors, first publication journal, and citation details are identified.
Within the terms of the license, authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in the journal.
