THE APPLICATION OF THE THESIS HELD IN AN INCIDENT OF RESOLUTION OF REPETITIVE DEMANDS TO THE STATE SPECIAL COURTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2022.62329Keywords:
incident of resolution of repetitive demands, State Special Courts, legal certainty, claim, binding forceAbstract
In view of the current scenario of decision-making divergence between Courts of Justice and Appeals Panels of Special State Courts, this article seeks to offer a solution to the legal uncertainty caused by the absence of mechanisms of jurisprudential standardization between both entities. In this sense, by the hypothetical-deductive method, we propose the extension of the legal thesis held on the Incident of Resolution of Repetitive Demands (IRDR) to the Special State Courts, to be made possible by means of a complaint. Therefore, it is necessary to briefly analyze the creation of the Special Courts, the deficiencies of their decision-making system and the IRDR institute, through the doctrine and jurisprudence developed in this regard. The article concludes with the proposal to extend the limits of the IRDR to serve as a standardizing bridge between ordinary justice and the microsystem of State Special Courts.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Todos os artigos publicados na Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual (REDP) (Departamento de Direito Processual, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) são licenciados por meio de uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais de seu artigo e concordam em licenciar seu trabalho com a licença CC BY 4.0, aceitando assim os termos e condições específicos desta licença disponíveis no seguinte website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
- Os autores concedem à REDP o direito de primeira publicação, de se identificar como publicadora original do trabalho e concedem à revista uma licença de direitos não exclusivos para utilizar o trabalho das seguintes formas: Reproduzir, vender e distribuir cópias eletrônicas ou impressas do manuscrito como um todo, de partes específicas do manuscrito e de suas traduções para qualquer idioma;
- O uso do artigo por terceiros é livre, contanto que a integridade da publicação seja mantida e seus autores originais, periódico de primeira publicação e detalhes de citação sejam identificados.
Dentro dos termos da licença, os autores podem entrar em acordos contratuais adicionais separados para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada do trabalho na revista.
Copyright and Licensing
All articles published in the Procedural Law Electronic Review (REDP) (Department of Procedural Law, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) are licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors retain copyright to their article and agree to license their work under the CC BY 4.0 license, thereby accepting the specific terms and conditions of this license available at the following website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ legal code.
- Authors grant REDP the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher of the work, and grant the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: Reproduce, sell and distribute electronic or printed copies of the manuscript as a whole, of specific parts of the manuscript and its translations into any language;
- Use of the article by third parties is free, as long as the integrity of the publication is maintained and its original authors, first publication journal, and citation details are identified.
Within the terms of the license, authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in the journal.
