some ethical implications of practicing philosophy with children and adults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2021.61025Keywords:
childhood, ethics, philosophy for childrenAbstract
This paper acts as an introduction to a dossier centered on the ethical implications of Practicing Philosophy with Children and Adults. It identifies ethical themes in the P4C movement over three generations of theorists and practitioners, and argues that, historically and materially, the transition to a “new” hermeneutics of childhood that has occurred within the P4C movement may be said to have emerged as a response to the ever-increasing pressure of neoliberalism and a weaponized capitalism to construct public policies in education on an over-regulated, prescribed, state-monitored, model. Could a new relationship to childhood provide the ethical and political agenda that our times require for doing philosophy with children with integrity? Could a radical listening and openness to childhood—which has been an intrinsic confessional characteristic of P4C pedagogy from the beginning--sustain the movement through these dark times? Finally, the paper presents a set of articles written in response to these questions: What, if any, should the ethical commitments of the P4C facilitator be? Is political/ideological neutrality required of the P4C facilitator? Is political neutrality possible? What constitutes indoctrination in educational settings? Are children more vulnerable to indoctrination than adults, and if so, what are the implications of that fact for the practice of P4C? What are the uses of P4C in the dramatically polarized ideological landscape we currently inhabit? What, if any, are the ethical responsibilities of a teacher engaging in philosophical practice? Are the philosophical practitioner’s ethical responsibilities similar or different when the subjects are children or adults? Does every methodology have a “hidden curriculum”? If so, what is the hidden curriculum of P4C? What distinguishes dialogical from monological practice? May one have the appearance of the other? Is the “Socratic method” (Elenchus) as we conceive it dialogical? What, if any, are the uses of irony in philosophical practice? Should Socrates (or any other philosopher) be considered a model for P4C practitioners?
References
A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform (1983). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Nation_at_Risk, last edited on 26 March 2021, at 17:46 (UTC).
Arendt, Hannah (1958). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.
Arendt, Hannah (1961), The crisis in education. In Between past and future, Chapter 5. London: Penguin Classics.
Barber, Benjamin R. (2004). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Oakland: University of California Press.
Breaux, Aimee. & Smith, Zachary Oren (2019). Greta Thurnberg took a Tessla to Iowa: Here’s what she had to say. Iowa City Press-Citizen. https://www.press-citizen.com/story/news/2019/10/04/greta-thunberg-speech-transcript-iowa-climate-strike/3868695002/
Chetty, Darren. Racism as ‘Reasonableness’: Philosophy for children and the gated Community of Inquiry. Childhood & Philosophy 13, 2018.
Deal, Terrence E; Nolan, Robert R (1978). Alternative schools: Ideologies, realities, guidelines. Chicago : Nelson-Hall.
Deleuze, Gilles., & Guattari, Felix. (1987). A thousand plateaus. B. Massumi, Trans. University of Minnesota Press.
Democratic Schools (2020). Wikipedia.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_education. And (http://www.idenetwork.org),
Dewey, John (1907). The school and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Elicor, P. philosophical inquiry with indigenous children: an attempt to integrate indigenous forms of knowledge in philosophy for/with children, Childhood & Philosophy 2019.
Gregory, Maughn (2011). Philosophy for children and its critics: A Mendham dialogue. Journal of Philosophy of Education 45(2)
Han, Byung-Chul (2020). The Burnout Society. Redwood City CA: Stanford University Press.
Kellett, Mary (2021), Voice, Participation, and Agency. Oxford Bibliographies, Childhood Studies.https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199791231/obo-9780199791231-0013.xml
Kennedy, David (2017). An archetypal phenomenology of skhole. Educational Theory 67, 3: 273-289.
Kennedy, David (forthcoming 2021). Schooling the new sensibility: Communal philosophical dialogue, play, and social democracy. In Petr Urban and Alice Koubová, Eds. Play & democracy: Philosophical perspectives. London: Routledge.
Landauer, Gustav ( 2010). Revolution and other writings: A political reader. Gabriel Kuhn Ed. & Trans. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
Lenin (1901) What is to be Done. E-Book https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1901/witbd/
Masschelein, Jan and Simons, Maarten (2013). In defense of the school: A public issue, Jack McMartin Trans. Leuven, Belgium: Education, Culture & Society.
Matthews, Gareth 1994) The Philosophy of Childhood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mbembe, A. (2019) Necropolitics. Duke: Duke University Press.
McCowan, Tristan (2010). Prefigurative approaches to participatory schooling: Experiences in Brazil. In Cox, Sue, Dyer, Caroline, Robinson-Pant, Anna & Schweisfurth, Michele (Eds). In Children as decision-makers in education: Sharing experiences across cultures. New York: Continuum.
Oser, Fritz K.; Althof, Wolfgang; & Higgins-D'Alessandro, Ann (2008). The just community approach to moral education: System change or individual change? Journal of Moral Education 37, 3(Sept): 395-415.
Raths, Louis (2020). Values Clarification. https://louisraths.wordpress.com/values-clarification-2/.
Tolstoy, Lev (1899). What Shall We Do? https://www.gutenberg.org/files/38690/38690-h/38690-h.htm.
United Nations (1959), Declaration of the Rights of the Child (originally drafted for the League of Nations in Geneva, Switzerland 1934).
Wall, John (2021). The Childism Institute: http:/childism.org
Zuboff, Shoshana. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.
