Clinical factors of women in labor well-being: deontological and bioethical principlism perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/reuerj.2024.80274Keywords:
Ethics, Professional, Patient Satisfaction, Labor, Obstetric, Maternal WelfareAbstract
Objective: to evaluate the clinical factors associated with women's well-being during labor and delivery in the light of bioethics principlism and deontology. Method: a cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach was conducted. It involved 396 postpartum women admitted to a municipal hospital in the southwest of Bahia. Data were collected from January to May 2023, after approval from the research ethics committee. The data were tabulated using Excel software and analyzed using SPSS v.25 through Multinomial Logistic Regression. Results: majority of the sample exhibited well-being with health care assistance. Women who underwent delivery performed by non-medical professionals showed higher chances of "adequate" levels of well-being. Additionally, women who did not undergo cesarean delivery showed increased chances of well-being. Conclusion: It is necessary for professionals to reflect on their actions, conditioning them to the humanization of childbirth, according to bioethical principles.
References
Pontificia Universidad Católica De Chile. Escuela de enfermaría, Departamento de salud de la mujer. Concepto subjetivo de bienestar materno. Departamento de Derechos intelectuales. Registro Propiedad intelectual, 2077; nº 162651.
Zanardo GLP, Uribe MC, De Nadal AHR, Habigzang LF. Violência obstétrica no Brasil: uma revisão narrativa. Psicol. Soc. 2017 [cited 2023 jun 25]; 29:e155043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-0310/2017v29155043.
Souto REM, Brito NS, Sousa LSD, Brandão JC, Damasceno AKDC, Melo ESJ, et al. Forms and prevalence of obstetric violence during labor and delivery: integrative review. Rev. enferm. UFPE on line. 2022 [cited 2023 Jun 25]; 16:e253246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5205/1981-8963.2022.253246.
Santos ALS, Paz CT, Fraga BGG, Barreto FL, Gramacho RDCCV, da Silva Borges AJ. Bioética e parto humanizado: concepções e práticas de enfermeiras obstetras. Textura. 2019 [cited 2024 Jan 25]; 13(21):93-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22479/desenreg2019v13n21p93-103.
Castillo RH. Bioética y derecho en el cuidado del recién nacido durante el parto. Quaestio Iuris. 2021 [cited 2024 Jan 25]; 14(04):1845-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2021.55388.
Jamas MT, Ferretti-Rebustini REDL, Rebustini F, Gonçalves IR, Gouveia LMR, Hoga L AK. Validity evidence of the Bienestar Materno en Situación de Parto Scale. Acta Paul. Enferm. 2021 [cited 2023 May 20]; 34:APE02843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2021AO02843.
Silva RCF, Westphal F, Assalin ACB, Silva MIM, Goldman RE. Satisfaction of pregnant women in relation to children and birth care. Rev enferm UFPE online. 2020 [cited 2023 Oct 25]; 14:e245851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5205/1981-8963.2020.245851.
Silva MJS, Silva TDS, Souza DRS, Souza AMG, Santos Ferreira TL, Andrade FB. Quality of care the childbirth and postpartum on the user's perception of primary health care. Rev Ciênc. Plural. 2020 [cited 2023 Jul 20]; 6(1):1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21680/2446-7286.2020v6n1ID16292.
Conselho Federal de Enfermagem. Resolução COFEN Nº 564/2017. Dispões sobre o código de ética do profissional de enfermagem. 2017 [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://www.cofen.gov.br/resolucao-cofen-no-5642017/.
Brasil. Diretriz nacional de assistência ao parto normal ministério da saúde versão preliminar Brasília – DF, 2022 [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://www.febrasgo.org.br/pt/noticias/item/download/615_9c68b60515aeb7bb1f3f022505721f2b.
Conselho Federal de Medicina. Código de Ética Médica: Resolução CFM nº 2.217, de 27 de setembro de 2018, modificada pelas Resoluções CFM nº 2.222/2018 e 2.226/2019 / Conselho Federal de Medicina – Brasília: Conselho Federal de Medicina, 2019 [cited 2023 Oct 25]. Available from: https://portal.cfm.org.br/images/PDF/cem2019.pdf.
Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Schlemper Junior BR. Bioethics in the reception of psychoactive drug dependents in therapeutic communities. Rev Bioética. 2018 [cited 2023 Jul 20]; 26(1):47-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422018261225.
Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife‐led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015 [cited 2023 jun 15]; 9:CD004667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub4.
Oliveira CF, Ribeiro AÂV, Luquine Junior CD, Bortoli MC, Toma TS, Chapman EMG, et al. Barriers to implementing guideline recommendations to improve childbirth care: rapid review of evidence. Rev Pan Salud Pública. 2020 [cited 2023 Aug 18]; 44:e132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.132.
Leal MDC, Bittencourt SDA, Esteves-Pereira AP, Ayres BVDS, Silva LBRADA, Thomaz EBAF, et al. Progress in childbirth care in Brazil: preliminary results of two evaluation studies. Cad Saude Publica. 2019 [cited 2023 Jun 15]; 35(7):e002230018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00223018.
Ministério da Saúde (Br). Diretrizes de atenção à gestante: a operação cesariana. Brasília: MS; 2015 [cited 2023 Jun 15]. Available from: http://conitec.gov.br/images/Consultas/Relatorios/2015/Relatorio_PCDTCesariana_CP.pdf.
Ministério da Saúde (Br). Painel de Monitoramento de Nascidos Vivos segundo Classificação de Risco Epidemiológico (Grupos de Robson). 2023 [cited 2023 Jun 14]; Available from: https://svs.aids.gov.br/daent/centrais-de-conteudos/paineis-de-monitoramento/natalidade/grupos-de-robson/
Chen I, Opiyo N, Tavender E, Mortazhejri S, Rader T, Petkovic J, et al. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018 [cited 2023 Jun 14]; 9:CD005528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd005528.pub3.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Chrisne Santana Biondo, Maria Madalena Souza dos Anjos Neta, Sérgio Donha Yarid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When publishing in Revista Enfermagem UERJ, the authors declare that the work is their exclusive authorship and therefore assume full responsibility for its content.
Authors retain copyright to their article and agree to license their work using a Creative Commons Attribution International Public License (CC BY), thereby accepting the terms and conditions of this license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en), which allows material created by the author to be distributed, copied and displayed by third parties. The original work must be cited and present a link to the article available on the website of the journal in which it was published.
The Copyright of the articles published in Revista Enfermagem UERJ belongs to their respective author(s), with the rights of first publication assigned to Revista Enfermagem UERJ, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License CC BY, which allows sharing of work with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The authors grant Revista Enfermagem UERJ the right of first publication, to identify themselves as the original publisher of the work and grant the magazine a license of non-exclusive rights to use the work in the following ways:
- Sell and/or distribute the work in printed copies and/or electronic format;
- Distribute parts and/or the work as a whole with the aim of promoting the magazine through the internet and other digital and printed media;
- Record and playback work in any format, including digital media.
In line with the journal's policies, each published article will be assigned a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
