a noção de fink de brincar no contexto da investigação filosófica com crianças.

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2021.56494

Palavras-chave:

fink, jogar, fpcc, investigação filosófica, jogo-mundo, crianças.

Resumo

Pesquisas em educação indicam que o currículo de Filosofia para Crianças (FpC) é fundamental para alcançar objetivos educacionais importantes. E, no entanto, é precisamente essa concepção instrumentalista do FpC que foi questionada por uma segunda geração de estudiosos do FpC. Entre outras coisas, esses estudiosos argumentam que P4C deve permanecer vigilante e evitar subscrever 1) desenvolvimentismo e 2) uma identificação redutora do pensamento com e a racionalidade. Pelo contrário, sugerem que P4C deve garantir dar voz à infância, permitindo-lhe entrar em diálogo genuíno com a idade adulta. Estudiosos que defendem uma abordagem não redutiva e não instrumentalista da FpC destacam a importância do brincar nas sessões de filosofia com crianças. Neste artigo, examino até que ponto a investigação filosófica tem lugar no contexto FpC pode ser entendida como uma atividade lúdica. Sustento que o relato de jogo de Fink pode nos ajudar a compreender melhor o que entendemos por jogo, o que, por sua vez, pode nos ajudar a examinar a compatibilidade entre as atividades do FpC e o jogo. Na primeira parte do artigo, examino algumas das ideias básicas de FpC e levanto a questão sobre a compatibilidade entre investigação filosófica e jogo. Na segunda parte do artigo, faço uma apreciação filosófica do jogo, baseando-me na obra de Eugen Fink. Na parte final do artigo, mostro como o jogo - entendido segundo a linha de Fink - é compatível com a investigação filosófica praticada em ambientes escolares.

Referências

Alvis, Jason W. (2019) "God’s Playthings: Eugen Fink’s Phenomenology of Religion in Play as Symbol of the World", Research in Phenomenology 49, 1: 88-117.

Ardley, Gavin. (1967) "The Role of Play in the Philosophy of Plato." Philosophy 42, (161): 226-244.

Biesta, Gert (2011) “Philosophy, exposure, and children: How to resist the instrumentalization of philosophy in education”. In: N. Vansieleghem and D. Kennedy (eds) Special Issue Philosophy for Children in Transition: Problems and Prospects Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(2): 305–321.

Bleazby, Jennifer. (2011) “Overcoming Relativism and Absolutism: Dewey's ideals of truth and meaning in philosophy for children”, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43 (5): 453-466.

Boronat, Nuria Saras Mirat. (2017) “Oasis of Happiness – The Play of the World and Human Existence”. In M. MacLean, W. Russell & E. Ryall (eds.) Philosophical Perspectives on Play. London: Routledge, 95-106.

Brinkmann, Malte & Friesen, Norm. (2018) “Phenomenology and Education.” In Paul Smeyers (ed) International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Springer, 591-608).

Bruzina, Ronald. (2004) Edmund Husserl and Eugen Fink. Beginnings and Ends in Phenomenology 1928–1938, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

D’Angour, Armand. (2013) “Plato and Play Taking Education Seriously in Ancient Greece.” American Journal of Play 5 (3): 293–307.

D’Olimpio, Laura & Teschers, Christoph. (2017) “Playing with philosophy: Gestures, life-performance, P4C and an art of living, Educational Philosophy and Theory”, 49 (13): 1257-1266.

Fink, Eugen. (1970) Erziehungswissenschaft und Lebenslehre. Freiburg: Rombach

Fink, Eugen. (1972) "What Does the Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl Want to Accomplish? (The Phenomenological Idea of Laying-a-Ground)." Research in Phenomenology 2: 5-27.

Fink, Eugen. (2003) Nietzsche's Philosophy, trans. G. Richter. London: Continuum.

Fink, Eugen. (2016) Play as Symbol of the World (and Other Writings), trans. I. A. Moore and C. Turner. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Freire, Paulo. (1993) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Harmondsworth, Penguin.

Gibbons, Andrew. (2007) “Philosophers as Children: Playing with style in the philosophy of education”, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39 (5): 506-518.

Gorard, S., Siddiqui, N. & See, B.H. (2017) "Can ‘Philosophy for Children’ Improve Primary School Attainment?", Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51 (1): 5-22.

Gregory, Maughn. (2011) “Philosophy for Children and Its Critics: A Mendham Dialogue.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (2): 199–219.

Halák, Jan. (2016) “Beyond Things: The Ontological Importance of Play According to Eugen Fink”. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport. 43 (2): 199–214.

Haynes, Joanna. (2003) Children as Philosophers. London: Routledge.

Haynes, Joanna & Murris, Karin. (2012) Picturebooks, Pedagogy and Philosophy. New York: Routledge.

Haynes, Joanna & Murris, Karin. (2013) “The realm of meaning: imagination, narrative and playfulness in philosophical exploration with young children”, Early Child Development and Care, 183 (8): 1084-1100.

Heidegger, Martin. (2000) Introduction to Metaphysics, trans. Gregory Fried and Richard Polt. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Huizinga, Johan. (1955) Homo Ludens: A Study of the Element of Play in Culture. Boston: Beacon Press.

Kennedy, David. (1999) "Philosophy for Children and the reconstruction of Philosophy", Metaphilosophy, 30 (4): 338-359.

Kennedy, David. (2002) “The Child and Postmodern Subjectivity”, Educational Theory, 5: 155– 67.

Kennedy, David. (2004) “The Role of a Facilitator in a Community of Philosophical Inquiry.” Metaphilosophy, 35 (5): 744-765.

Krell, David F. (1972) “Towards an Ontology of Play: Eugen Fink’s Notion of Spiel.” Research in Phenomenology. 2 (1): 63–93.

Kohan, Walter Omar. (2014) Philosophy and Childhood: Critical Perspectives and Affirmative Practices. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kohan, Walter Omar. (2018) "Paulo Freire and Philosophy for Children: A Critical Dialogue", Studies in Philosophy and Education, 37 (6): 615-629.

Lipman, Matthew. (2011) “Philosophy for Children: Some Assumptions and Implications”, Ethics in Progress, 2 (1): 3-16.

Lipman, Matthew., Sharp, A.M, & Oscanyan, F. S. (1980). Philosophy in the Classroom, 2nd ed., Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Lipman, Matthew & Sharp, Ann Margaret. (1978) “Some Educational Presuppositions of Philosophy for Children”, Oxford Review of Education, 4 (1): 85-90.

Lipman, Matthew. (2003) Thinking in Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Malpas, Jeff. (2006) Heidegger’s Topology: Being, Place, World. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Moran, Dermot. (2007) “Fink’s Speculative Phenomenology: Between Constitution and Transcendence”, Research in Phenomenology 37 (1): 3-31.

Murris, Karin. (2016) “The Philosophy for Children Curriculum: Resisting ‘Teacher Proof’ Texts and the Formation of the Ideal Philosopher Child”, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 35 (1): 63–78.

Nussbaum, Martha. (1990) “Finely Aware and Richly Responsible: Literature and the moral imagination”. In Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 148-167.

Pritchard, Michael. (2018) “Philosophy for Children”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, URL= https://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=children.

Reed, Ronald & Johnson, Tony. (1999) Friendship and Moral Education. Twin Pillars of Philosophy for Children. New York: Peter Lang.

Sharp, Ann Margaret. (1987) “What is a ‘Community of Inquiry’?”, Journal of Moral Education 16 (1): 37-45.

Shchyttsova, Tatiana. (2019) “Poetics of Intergenerational Relations. To the Importance of Eugen Fink’s Cosmological Substantiation of Educational Coexistence”. In M. Brinkmann, J. Türstig, Johannes, M. Weber-Spanknebel (eds.) Leib – Leiblichkeit – Embodiment: Pädagogische Perspektiven auf eine Phänomenologie des Leibes. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 267-278.

Smith, Richard. (2011) “The Play of Socratic Dialogue”, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45 (2): 221-233.

Van der Leeuw, Karel. (2009) Philosophy for Children as Educational Reform”. In: E. Marsal, T. Dobashi and B. Weber (eds) Children Philosophize Worldwide. Theoretical and Practical Concepts. New York, Peter Lang, 117–126.

Vansieleghem, Nancy & Kennedy, David. (2011) “Introduction: What is philosophy for children, what is philosophy with children: After Matthew Lipman?” In: N. Vansieleghem and D. Kennedy (eds.) Special Issue Philosophy for Children in Transition: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45 (2): 171–183.

Vansieleghem, Nancy. (2005) “Philosophy for Children as the Wind of Thinking”, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39 (1): 19–37.

Weber, Barbara. (2011) “Childhood, philosophy and play”. In: N. Vansieleghem and D. Kennedy (eds) Special Issue Philosophy for Children in Transition: Problems and Prospects, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(2), 235–251.

Winnicott, Donald. (2009) Playing and Reality. London: Routledge.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-04-30

Como Citar

petropoulos, georgios. (2021). a noção de fink de brincar no contexto da investigação filosófica com crianças. Childhood & Philosophy, 17, 01–24. https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2021.56494

Edição

Seção

artigos