desafiando o adultocentrismo: discurso oral e a possibilidade de diálogo intergeracional

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2023.73517

Palavras-chave:

adultocentrismo, fpcc, comunidade de investigação filosófica, temporalidade, Merleau-Ponty, discurso oral, expressividade

Resumo

Este artigo reflete sobre o papel da Filosofia no ambiente escolar, dando atenção especial à promessa de diálogo intergeracional levada adiante pelos programas de filosofia associados ao currículo de Filosofia para Crianças (FpC) de Lipman e sua atual transformação em Filosofia com Crianças (FcC). Existem duas ideias básicas que constituem a linha orientadora das minhas reflexões. A primeira é que intervenções filosóficas desse tipo desafiam as visões adultocêntricas da educação e da filosofia. A segunda é que essa iniciativa carrega consigo a promessa de reconhecer crianças como participantes iguais no processo de questionamento filosófico e de criação de significado. Na primeira parte do artigo, defendo a importância de entender o ato de filosofar com crianças como um rompimento do adultocentrismo. Primeiro, reflito sobre uma estreita orientação-para-o-futuro que parece caracterizar a temporalidade da escola. Sugiro que as intervenções da Filosofia para/com Crianças (FpcC) interrompam essa orientação para o futuro, convidando os estudantes a mergulharem em um “agora” de múltiplas possibilidades. Em seguida, reflito sobre as maneiras pelas quais as intervenções da FpcC desafiam o pressuposto de que a filosofia é uma preocupação de adultos. É dada atenção especial ao trabalho de acadêmicos que desafiam nossos pressupostos restritivos sobre o que se qualifica como pensamento filosófico. Na segunda parte deste artigo, volto-me para o trabalho de Merleau-Ponty com o objetivo de rascunhar alguns requisitos para a possibilidade de diálogo entre infância e adultez. Sugiro que as reflexões de Merleau-Ponty sobre a infância e a fala expressiva são inestimáveis no contexto da FpcC porque nos convidam a: 1) apreciar a alteridade das crianças sem reduzi-las a “outros” inferiores e 2) permanecer atentos para a expressividade do discurso infantil. 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

georgios petropoulos, Universidade de Dublin

Bolsista de pós-doutorado

Referências

Apostolopoulos, D. (2019). Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Language. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.

Biesta, G. (2013). The Beautiful Risk of Education. London: Routledge.

Carman, T. (2008). Merleau-Ponty. London: Routledge.

Chetty, D. & Suissa, J. (2017). ‘No go areas’: Racism and discomfort in the community of inquiry. In M. R. Gregory, J. Haynes, K. Murris (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children (pp. 11-18). London: Routledge.

Chetty, D. (2018). Racism as ‘Reasonableness’: Philosophy for Children and the Gated Community of Inquiry. Ethics and Education, 13(1), 30-54.

Ferrando, F. (2019). Philosophical Posthumanism. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Fink, E. (2016). Play as Symbol of the World (and Other Writings), trans. I. A. Moore and C. Turner. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Halák, J. (2022). Gesturing in Language: Merleau-Ponty and Mukařovský at the Phenomenological Limits of Structuralism. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 53(4), 415-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2022.2076136

Haynes, J. & Murris, K. (2021). right under our noses: The postponement of children's political equality and the NOW. Childhood & Philosophy, 17, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2021.55060

Heidegger, M. (2009). Being and Time, trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Kee, H. (2018). Phenomenology and Ontology of Language and Expression: Merleau-Ponty on Speaking and Spoken Speech. Human Studies, 41(3), 415-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-018-9456-x

Kennedy, D. & Kohan, W. O. (2017). Childhood, Education, and Philosophy: A Matter of Time. In M. R. Gregory, J. Haynes, K. Murris (Eds.). The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children (pp. 46-52). London: Routledge.

Kennedy, D. (2018). Community of Philosophical Inquiry and the Play of the World. Teaching Philosophy, 41(3), 285-302

Kennedy, D. (2006). The Well of Being: Childhood, Subjectivity, and Education. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Kitchener, R. F. (1990). Do Children Think Philosophically? Metaphilosophy, 21(4), 416-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.1990.tb00541.x

Kohan, W. O. (2015). Childhood, Education and Philosophy: New Ideas for an Old Relationship. New York: Routledge.

Kohan, W. O., & Weber, B. (Eds.). (2020). Thinking, Childhood, and Time: Contemporary Perspectives on the Politics of Education. New York: Lexington.

Landes, D. A. (2013). Merleau-Ponty and the Paradoxes of Expression. London: Bloomsbury.

Lipman, M. (2011). Philosophy for Children: Some Assumptions and Implications. Ethics in Progress, 2(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2011.1.2

Lipman, M. & Sharp, A. M. (1978). Some Educational Presuppositions of Philosophy for Children. Oxford Review of Education, 4(1): 85-90.

Mensch, J. (2020). Childhood and the Genesis of Time: A Phenomenological Approach. In W. O. Kohan and B. Weber (Eds.), Thinking, Childhood and Time. Contemporary Perspectives in the Politics of Education (pp. 11-30). New York: Lexington Books.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2010). Child Psychology and Pedagogy: The Sorbonne Lectures 1949–52. Trans. by T. Welsh. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception. Trans by M. Landes. London: Routledge.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964a). Signs. Trans. by R.C. McCeleary. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964b). The Primacy of Perception: And Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History, and Politics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Meyer-Drawe, K. (1986). Kaleidoscope of Experiences: The Capability to be Surprised by Children. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 4(3), 48–54.

Morris, K. J. (2017). Merleau-Ponty on Understanding Other Others. In L. Dolezal & D. Petherbridge (Eds), Body / Self / Other: The Phenomenology of Social Encounters (pp. 237-266). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Murris, K. (2000). Can Children do Philosophy? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34(2), 261-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00172

Murris, K. (2020). Posthuman Child: De(con)structing Western Notions of Child Agency. In W. O. Kohan and B. Weber (Eds.), Thinking, Childhood and Time. Contemporary Perspectives in the Politics of Education (pp. 161-178). New York: Lexington Books.

Murris, K. (2016). The Posthuman Child: Educational Transformation through Philosophy with Picturebooks. London: Routledge

Murris, K., & Kohan, W. O. (2021). Troubling troubled school time: posthuman multiple temporalities. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 34(7), 581-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2020.1771461

O’Brien, M. (2011). Heidegger and Authenticity: From Resoluteness to Releasement. London: Continuum.

Petropoulos, G. (2021). fink’s notion of play in the context of philosophical inquiry with children. Childhood & Philosophy, 17, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2021.56494

Petropoulos, G. (2024) Heidegger and Fink: From the Futurism of Care to the “Now” of Play Angelaki, 29(5) (to be published)

Piaget, J (1933). Children's Philosophies. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology (pp. 377-391). Worchester, MA: Clark University Press.

Reed-Sandoval, A. & Sykes, A. C. (2017). Who talks? Who listens? Taking ‘positionality’ seriously in Philosophy for Children. In M. R. Gregory, J. Haynes, K. Murris (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children (pp. 219-226). London: Routledge.

Rollo, T. (2018). Feral Children: Settler Colonialism, Progress, and the Figure of the Child. Settler Colonial Studies, 8(1), 60-79.

Van der Leeuw, K. (2009). Philosophy for Children as Educational Reform. In E. Marsal, T. Dobashi and B. Weber (eds). Children Philosophize Worldwide. Theoretical and Practical Concepts (pp. 111-116). New York, Peter Lang.

Vansieleghem, N. & Kennedy, D. (2011) Introduction: What is Philosophy for Children, what is Philosophy with Children: After Matthew Lipman?” Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(2): 171–183.

Vansieleghem, N. (2005). Philosophy for Children as the Wind of Thinking. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39 (1): 19–37.

Waldenfels, B. (2011). Phenomenology of the Alien: Basic Concepts. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Weber, B. (2020). Child and Time: A Phenomenological Journey into the Human Conditions of Education. In W. O. Kohan and B. Weber (Eds.), Thinking, Childhood and Time. Contemporary Perspectives in the Politics of Education (31-50). New York: Lexington Books.

Weber, B. (2011). Childhood, Philosophy and Play. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(2), 235–251.

Downloads

Publicado

2023-05-30

Como Citar

PETROPOULOS, Georgios. desafiando o adultocentrismo: discurso oral e a possibilidade de diálogo intergeracional. childhood & philosophy, Rio de Janeiro, v. 19, p. 01–22, 2023. DOI: 10.12957/childphilo.2023.73517. Disponível em: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/childhood/article/view/73517. Acesso em: 1 maio. 2025.

Edição

Seção

dossier: o presente e o futuro de fazer filosofia com crianças

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)