Brian Selznick’s The invention of Hugo Cabret, Martin Scorsese’s Hugo, and the theft of subjectivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/soletras.2012.5026Keywords:
Hugo. Brian Selznick. Martin Scorsese. Subjectivity. Adaptation.Abstract
Sanders (2006) and Hutcheon (2006) are among the many adaptation theorists whochallenge the criterion of ‘fidelity’, and yet a frequent response to Martin Scorsese’sAcademy Award-winning film Hugo is that it is faithful to Brian Selznick’s Caldecott Medalwinningbook The invention of Hugo Cabret. This paper argues that in each case the mediumdetermines a significant difference in the construction of subjectivity. The book’spreoccupation with theft indicates a Lacanian concern with the origin of subjectivity and theimplied author’s subtextual guilt about his dependence on the work of another artist. Thefilm’s shift in emphasis to the necessity of relationships and family, however, parallelsKristeva’s assumption that intertextuality is inevitable. As Geraghty (2009) points out,adaptation is by definition dependent on another text. Consequently, Scorsese’s Hugo ignoresthe book’s concern with originality and, at a time when cinema is again being repositioned bytechnological change, celebrates the continuity and heritage of the medium.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The approval of the article implies the immediate and free transfer of the publication rights in this journal. The author (s) authorize the Postgraduate Program in Literature and Linguistics (PPLIN) to reproduce it and publish it in Revista SOLETRAS, understanding the terms "reproduction" and "publication" in accordance with Definition of article 5 of Law 9610/98. The author (s) will continue to own the copyright for subsequent publications. The article can be accessed by the world wide web (http://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/soletras), being allowed, free of charge, the consultation and the reproduction of copy of the article for own use. Cases of plagiarism or any illegalities in the submitted texts are the sole responsibility of their authors.