A TRAJETÓRIA NORMATIVA DA MEDIAÇÃO: UM DIÁLOGO ENTRE BRASIL E ITÁLIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2024.81923Abstract
The contemporary resurgence of mediation is a diversified process that is significantly influenced by the existing national legal systems in each country. It is important to recognize that the diversification of mediation practices in different countries is singularized from two factors that can be highlighted as determinants: the historical context of mediation development and normative regulation. With that being said, the main objective of this article is to analyze the development of mediation in Italy, with a focus on regulatory norms, in order to foster a dialogue with mediation in Brazil. In this perspective, the present research is justified by the similarity between the social regulation systems of Brazil and Italy, since both can be considered as States that constitute typical examples of countries that adopt civil law as their legal matrix. Thus, an important contraposition is made to the North American model of mediation, based on a legal system characteristic of the common law. In that sense, the study aims to address the following question: what are the unique characteristics of the normative path of mediation in Brazil and Italy? To accomplish this, a descriptive study was conducted, utilizing a comparative approach to examine the development of the institution of mediation in Brazil and Italy, with particular emphasis on the analysis of the historical context and regulatory milestones. Ultimately, the study identified the following: the influence of the North American model on the development of mediation in Brazil and Italy; the external origin of normative regulation of the institution, separate from the national legislative power; significant conceptual differences between mediation and conciliation; and, finally, the existence of distinct possibilities for the application of the institution, depending on the nature of the rights subject to the conflict. Thus, despite the similarity of their legal systems and the strong American influence, it can be concluded that mediation in Brazil and Italy developed in highly distinctive ways in each country, with only a few points of contact.
Published
Versions
- 2024-02-07 (3)
- 2024-02-07 (2)
- 2024-02-07 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tássio Túlio Braz Bezerra, Fabiana Marion Spengler
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todos os artigos publicados na Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual (REDP) (Departamento de Direito Processual, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) são licenciados por meio de uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais de seu artigo e concordam em licenciar seu trabalho com a licença CC BY 4.0, aceitando assim os termos e condições específicos desta licença disponíveis no seguinte website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
- Os autores concedem à REDP o direito de primeira publicação, de se identificar como publicadora original do trabalho e concedem à revista uma licença de direitos não exclusivos para utilizar o trabalho das seguintes formas: Reproduzir, vender e distribuir cópias eletrônicas ou impressas do manuscrito como um todo, de partes específicas do manuscrito e de suas traduções para qualquer idioma;
- O uso do artigo por terceiros é livre, contanto que a integridade da publicação seja mantida e seus autores originais, periódico de primeira publicação e detalhes de citação sejam identificados.
Dentro dos termos da licença, os autores podem entrar em acordos contratuais adicionais separados para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada do trabalho na revista.
Copyright and Licensing
All articles published in the Procedural Law Electronic Review (REDP) (Department of Procedural Law, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) are licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors retain copyright to their article and agree to license their work under the CC BY 4.0 license, thereby accepting the specific terms and conditions of this license available at the following website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ legal code.
- Authors grant REDP the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher of the work, and grant the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: Reproduce, sell and distribute electronic or printed copies of the manuscript as a whole, of specific parts of the manuscript and its translations into any language;
- Use of the article by third parties is free, as long as the integrity of the publication is maintained and its original authors, first publication journal, and citation details are identified.
Within the terms of the license, authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in the journal.
