EVALUATION OF MARKET METERS MARKETED AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR STUDY IN THE FOOD AND NUTRITION AREA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/demetra.2019.37993Keywords:
Food Utensils. Weights and Measures. Serving and CookingAbstract
Considering the great variety of brands with different materials and forms of measuring devices, the lack of studies, the importance and the reliability of data for dietary studies, was aimed to evaluate the mass and volume capacity of home meters. This was an experimental study carried out in the Laboratory of Dietetic Technique of UFRJ, where they purchased homemade meters marketed in Rio de Janeiro, with 11 brands of tea cups (XCH) and 12 brands of soup spoon (CS), in the which five measurements of gravimetric and volumetric capacities were carried out. The mass was determined with wheat flour and for the volume the water was used, density 1.0 kg/m3 at 4 °C, as reference. Data were submitted to descriptive statistics, ANOVA and Tukey's test. The average mass capacity for XCH and CS was 106.8 g and 6.8 g, respectively. The XCH and CS presented mean volumes of 213.1 mL and 15.4 mL, respectively, with inadequacy of 20-40% for XCH, while CS were 7.4 to 16%, notably lower variation for both capacities. The capacities of commercially available home meters were detected with the national recommendation proposed by RDC 359 of December 2003. It is concluded that there is a need for specific legislation for the standardization of marketed meters, and consequently control by of inspection organs in the manufacture and marketing of the same, in order to avoid imprecision in the practices in food and nutrition by the population and professionals of related areas.
DOI: 10.12957/demetra.2019.37993
Considering the great variety of brands with different materials and forms of measuring devices, the lack of studies, the importance and the reliability of data for dietary studies, was aimed to evaluate the mass and volume capacity of home meters. This was an experimental study carried out in the Laboratory of Dietetic Technique of UFRJ, where they purchased homemade meters marketed in Rio de Janeiro, with 11 brands of tea cups (XCH) and 12 brands of soup spoon (CS), in the which five measurements of gravimetric and volumetric capacities were carried out. The mass was determined with wheat flour and for the volume the water was used, density 1.0 kg/m3 at 4 °C, as reference. Data were submitted to descriptive statistics, ANOVA and Tukey's test. The average mass capacity for XCH and CS was 106.8 g and 6.8 g, respectively. The XCH and CS presented mean volumes of 213.1 mL and 15.4 mL, respectively, with inadequacy of 20-40% for XCH, while CS were 7.4 to 16%, notably lower variation for both capacities. The capacities of commercially available home meters were detected with the national recommendation proposed by RDC 359 of December 2003. It is concluded that there is a need for specific legislation for the standardization of marketed meters, and consequently control by of inspection organs in the manufacture and marketing of the same, in order to avoid imprecision in the practices in food and nutrition by the population and professionals of related areas.Keywords: Food Utensils. Weights and Measures. Serving and CookingDownloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP RESPONSIBILITY
Title of the manuscript:
________________________________________________________
1. Statement of responsability
I certify that I have participated in the work above specified and take public responsibility for its content.
I certify that the manuscript represents an original work and that none of the material in the manuscript has been previously published, is included in another manuscript, or is currently under consideration for publication elsewhere, whether in printed form or in electronic media, except that described in the attachment.
In case of acceptance of this text by Demetra: Alimentação, Nutrição & Saude, I declare to be in accordance with the policy of public access and copyright adopted by Demetra, which provides as follows: (a) the authors retain the copyright and grant to the Journal the right of first publication, the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal; (b) authors are authorized to enter additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal; and (c) authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work.
2. Conflict of Interest Statement
I certify that there is no conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Date, signature and full address of all authors.