The legal pluralism in the Brazilian experience:
a critique of Raymundo Faoro's monist historiography
Keywords:
Legal history, Legal pluralism, Brazilian Empire, Colonial Brazil, Raymundo FaoroAbstract
https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2025/82556
This article investigates the reasonableness of historiographical interpretations that reduce the Brazilian legal experience, from the colonial period onward, to the law-making will of the sovereign State. To examine this perspective, which found its most well-defined expression in Raymundo Faoro's work Os donos do poder (“The Owners of Power”), this article conducts a long-term analysis of Brazilian colonial and imperial history in search of institutions and centers of power, whether public or private, that escape the monist framework. It is concluded that the Brazilian legal experience was highly complex, pluralistic, and replete with local laws, which requires legal historiography to adapt its research agenda and methodologies.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 João Paulo Mansur (Autor/a)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors the sole responsibility for their texts.
It is allowed the total or partial reproduction of the articles of the Journal Law and Praxis, if the author is mentioned.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial, provided the original authorship is cited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.