The so-called outsourcing (subcontracting) question and its regulation / A polêmica sobre o conceito de terceirização e sua regulação
Keywords:
Outsourcing, Division of labour, Casualization / Terceirização, Divisão do trabalho, Precarização.Abstract
DOI:10.1590/2179-8966/2020/50086
Abstract
Although outsourcing (or subcontracting) has been subject of great controversy, there is predominant consensus over the concept that defines it. The aim of this paper is to discuss this consensus and point out its contradictions, indicating that the casualization of labour related to outsourcing is not a contingency, but corollary of the nature of this way of hiring workers, which tends to reduce the chances of limiting labour exploitation.
Keywords: Outsourcing; Division of labour; Casualization.
Resumo
Apesar de a terceirização ser objeto de grandes controvérsias, existe um consenso acerca do conceito que a define. O objetivo deste texto é problematizar esse consenso e apontar suas contradições, demonstrando que a precarização do trabalho relacionada à terceirização não é uma contingência, mas corolário da natureza dessa forma de contratação de trabalhadores, que tende a reduzir as chances de limitação da exploração do trabalho.
Palavras-chave: Terceirização; Divisão do trabalho; Precarização.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors the sole responsibility for their texts.
It is allowed the total or partial reproduction of the articles of the Journal Law and Praxis, if the author is mentioned.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial, provided the original authorship is cited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.