Multidimensional frailty assessment tools for use in the care of older adults with cardiovascular disease
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/reuerj.2024.82186Keywords:
Aging; Frailty, Cardiovascular Diseases, Assessment Tools, Nursing ProcessAbstract
Objective: to identify which tools are available for multidimensional frailty assessment of older adult with cardiovascular disease and which are potentially applicable during the Nursing Process. Method: a systematic review conducted in eight databases/portals to identify studies that presented multidimensional frailty assessment tools for older adult with cardiovascular disease and that were applicable to the nursing process. Results: a total of 19 multidimensional tools were included. The Brief Frailty Index for Coronary Artery Disease was developed for use in the cardiovascular care of older adult. The Frailty Index for Adults and the Maastricht Frailty Screening Tool for Hospitalized Patients were developed for use in the Nursing Process. Conclusion: although only one tool was developed for older adults with cardiovascular disease and only two are applicable to the nursing process, most of them have the potential to be adapted and validated for use in this population during nursing assessment.
References
Cohen CI, Benyaminov R, Rahman M, Ngu D, Reinhardt M. Frailty: a multidimensional biopsychosocial syndrome. Med Clin North Am. 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 107(1):183-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2022.04.006.
Qiu Y, Li G, Wang X, Liu W, Li X, Yang Y, Wang L, Chen L. Prevalence of multidimensional frailty among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 [cited 2024 Ma 15]; 14:104755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104755.
Merrick E, Bloomfield K, Seplaki C, Shannon K, Wham C, Winnington R, et al. A systematic review of reasons and risks for acute service use by older adult residents of long‐term care. J Clin Nurs. 2024 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 00:1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17165.
Park C, Ko FC. The science of frailty: sex differences. Clin Geriat Med. 2021 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 37(4):625-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2021.05.008.
Ribeiro AR, Howlett SE, Fernandes A. Frailty—A promising concept to evaluate disease vulnerability. Mech Ageing Dev. 2020 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 187:111217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2020.111217.
Sutton JL, Gould RL, Daley S, Coulson MC, Ward EV, Butler AM, et al. Psychometric properties of multicomponent tools designed to assess frailty in older adults: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2016 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 16:55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0225-2.
Faller JW, Pereira DDN, de Souza S, Nampo FK, Orlandi FS, Matumoto S. Instruments for the detection of frailty syndrome in older adults: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2019 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 14(4):e0216166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216166.
Moumneh MB, Jamil Y, Kalra K, Ijaz N, Campbell G, Kochar A, et al. Frailty in the cardiac intensive care unit: assessment and impact. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024 [cited 2024 Mar 25]; 25:zuae039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuae039.
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al (ed.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane. 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 372:n71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
Ferretti-Rebustini RE. Psychometrics: applications in Nursing. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 31:e3992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.0000.3992.
Joint Committee on the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing of the American Educational Research Association, the American Psychological Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: American Educational Research Association, 2014 [cited 2024 Feb 19]. Available from: https://www.apa.org/science/programs/testing/standards.
Studenski S, Hayes RP, Leibowitz RQ, Bode R, Lavery L, Walston J, et al. Clinical glocbal impression of change in physical frailty: development of a measure based on clinical judment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 52:1560-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52423.x.
Jones DM, Song X, Rockwood K. Operationalizing a frailty index from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Am Geriatric Soc. 2004 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 52:1929-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52521.x.
Rolfson DB, Majumdar SR, Tsuyuki RT, Tahir A, Rockwood K. Validity and reliability of the Edmonton frail scale. Age Ageing, 2016 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 35(5):526-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afl041.
Freiheit EA, Hogsn DB, Eliaszie M, Meekes MF, Ghali WA, Partlo LA. Development of a frailty index for patients with a coronary artery disease. J Am Geriatric Soc. 2010 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 58:1526-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02961.x.
Kamaruzzaman S, Ploubidis GB, Fletcher A, Ebrahim S. A reliable measure of frailty for a community dwelling older population. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2010 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 8:123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-123.
Gobbens RJ, van Assen MA, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. The Tilburg frailty indicator: psychometric properties. J Am Med Direct Assoc. 2010 Jun 1 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 11(5):344-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003.
De Witte N, Gobbens RJJ, De Donder L, Dury S, Buffel T, Verté D, et al. Validation of the comprehensive frailty assessment instrument against the Tilburg Frailty Indicator. Eur Geriatr Med. 2013 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 358:1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurger.2013.03.001.
Van Kempen JAL, Schers HJ, Jacobs A, Zuidema SU, Ruikes F, Robben SHM, et al. Development of an instrument for the identification of frail older people as a target population for integrated care. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; e225-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp13x664289.
Peters LL, Boter H, Buskens E, Slaets JP. Measurement properties of the Groningen Frailty Indicator in home-dwelling and institutionalized elderly people. J Am Med Direct Assoc. 2012 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 13(6):546-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2012.04.007.
Di Bari M, Profili F, Bandinelli S, Salvioni A, Mossello E, Corridori C, et al. Screening for frailty in older adults using a postal questionnaire: rationale, methods, and instruments validation of the Inter-frail Study. JAGS. 2014 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 62:1933– 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13029.
Tocchi C, Dixon J, Naylor M, Jeon S, McCorkle R. Development of a frailty measure for older adults: the frailty index for elders. J Nurs Measur. 2014 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 22(2):223–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.22.2.223.
Ng TP, Feng L, Nyunt MSZ, Larbi A. Frailty in older persons: multidystem risk factors and the frailty. J Am Med Direct Assoc. 2014 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 15(9):635–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2014.03.008.
Warnier RMJ, van Rossum E, van Leendert JAA, Pijls NAT, Mulder WJ, Schols JMGA, et al. Screeninf for frailty in hospitalized older adults: reliability and feasibility of the Maastricht Frailty Screening Tool for Hospitalized Patients (MFST – HP). Res in Gerontol Nurs. 2016 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 9(5):243–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20160906-01.
Jokar TO, Ibraheem K, Rhee P, Kulavatunyou N, Haider A, Phelan HA, et al. Emergency general surgery specific frailty index: a validation study. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 81(2): 254–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001120.
Vernerey D, Anota A, Vandel P, Paget-Bailly SP, Dion M, Bailly V, et al. Development and validation of the FRAGIRE tool for assessment and older person’s risk for frailty. BMC Geriatr. 2016 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 16:187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0360-9.
Kajsa E, Katarina W, Sten L, Synneve ID. Screening for frailty among older emergency department visitors: validation of the new FRESH-screening instrument. BMC Emerg Med. 2016 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 16:27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-016-0087-0.
Satake S, Senda K, Hong YJ, Miura H, Endo H, Sakurai T, et al. Validity of the K ihon Checklist for assessing frailty status. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 16(6):709-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12543.
Hoogendijk EO, Theou O, Rockwood K, Philipsen BDO, Deeg DJH, Huisman M. Development and validation of frailty index in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 29:927–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0689-0.
Kim DH, Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ, Lipsitz LA, Rockwood K, Avorn J. Measuring frailty in medicare data: development and validation of claims-based frailty index. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med. 2018 [cited 2023 Aug 10]; 73(7):980–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fgerona%2Fglx229.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Renata Eloah de Lucena Ferretti-Rebustini, Paola Alves de Oliveira Lucchesi, Winnie da Silva Alves, Alejandra Rojas-Rivera, Diego Ferreira da Silva, Joathan Borges Ribeiro, Luan Cesar Ferreira Simões
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When publishing in Revista Enfermagem UERJ, the authors declare that the work is their exclusive authorship and therefore assume full responsibility for its content.
Authors retain copyright to their article and agree to license their work using a Creative Commons Attribution International Public License (CC BY), thereby accepting the terms and conditions of this license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en), which allows material created by the author to be distributed, copied and displayed by third parties. The original work must be cited and present a link to the article available on the website of the journal in which it was published.
The Copyright of the articles published in Revista Enfermagem UERJ belongs to their respective author(s), with the rights of first publication assigned to Revista Enfermagem UERJ, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License CC BY, which allows sharing of work with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The authors grant Revista Enfermagem UERJ the right of first publication, to identify themselves as the original publisher of the work and grant the magazine a license of non-exclusive rights to use the work in the following ways:
- Sell and/or distribute the work in printed copies and/or electronic format;
- Distribute parts and/or the work as a whole with the aim of promoting the magazine through the internet and other digital and printed media;
- Record and playback work in any format, including digital media.
In line with the journal's policies, each published article will be assigned a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
