educação filosófica baseada no lugar: reconstruindo o "lugar", reconstruindo a ética
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2021.54696Palavras-chave:
filosofia ambiental, ecofeminismo, educação baseada em localização, filosofia com crianças, pedagogia indígena crítica.Resumo
A educação como formação da identidade nas democracias liberais de estilo ocidental baseia-se, em parte, na neutralidade como uma justificativa para a reprodução da identidade individual coletiva, incluindo identidades sociais, culturais, institucionais e políticas, muitos aspectos dos quais são problemáticos em termos de reprodução de atitudes, crenças e ações ambientalmente prejudiciais para o meio ambiente. Para se posicionar sobre uma questão, é necessário abrir mão de certas formas de neutralidade, assim como efetivamente ensinar educação ambiental. Afirmamos que reivindicar uma posição de neutralidade é reivindicar uma posição além da crítica. Na sala de aula, essa também pode ser uma posição epistemologicamente prejudicial de se ocupar. Para explorar ainda mais o problema da neutralidade na sala de aula e para oferecer uma possível solução, olharemos para a pedagogía da comunidade filosófica de investigação filosófica e defenderemos a incorporação da uma educação situada; uma forma de educação experimental que promove a aprendizagem nas comunidades locais em que a escola está inserida, cada uma com sua própria história, cultura, economia e meio ambiente. No entanto, como entendemos o "lugar" é fundamental para compreender o potencial da educação baseada no lugar em dar aos estudantes um "sentido de lugar" - como eles percebem um lugar, que inclui apego ao lugar e significado de lugar. Para este fim, olhamos para as compreensões indígenas do lugar e da aprendizagem da reconstrução social para dar forma as pedagogias baseadas no lugar. Desse modo, acreditamos, que se abre um caminho para a educação ética.
Referências
Bleazby, J. (2004). Practicality and philosophy for children. Critical and Creative Thinking: The Australasian Journal of Philosophy in Schools. 12(2), 33–44.
Bleazby, J. (2012). Dewey’s notion of imagination in philosophy for children. Education and Culture, 28(2), 95–111.
Bleazby, J. (2013). Social reconstruction learning: Dualism, Dewey and philosophy in schools. New York: Routledge.
Bleazby, J. (2015). Why some school subjects have a higher status than others: The epistemology of the traditional curriculum hierarchy. Oxford Review of Education, 41(5), 671–689.
Bleazby, J. (2020). Philosophy for children (P4C) From the USA to Australia: The development of P4C as an Ecofeminist pedagogy. Agora, Online. https://pesaagora.com/columns/philosophy-for-children-p4c-from-the-usa-to-australia/
Burgh, G., & Thornton, S. (2019a). The philosophical classroom: an Australian story. In G. Burgh & S. Thornton (Eds.), Philosophical inquiry with children: The development of an inquiring society in Australia (pp. 1‒5). London & New York: Routledge.
Burgh, G., & Thornton, S. (2019b). Ecosocial citizenship education: Facilitating interconnective, deliberative practice and corrective methodology for epistemic accountability. Childhood & Philosophy, 15, 43–61.
Chetty, D. (2014). The elephant in the room: Picturebooks, philosophy for children and racism. Childhood & Philosophy, 10(19), 11–31.
Colwell, T. (1970). The relevance of John Dewey: A review of four books on Dewey (Book Review). History of Education Quarterly, 10(1), 113–26.
Cole, D.R., & Somerville, M. (2020). The affect(s) of literacy learning in the mud. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–17.
Cravey, M., & Petit, A. (2012). A critical pedagogy of place: Learning through the body. Feminist Formations, 24(2), 100–119.
Cronon, W. (1995). The trouble with wilderness: or, getting back to the wrong nature. In W. Cronon (Ed.), Uncommon ground: Toward reinventing nature (pp. 69–90). New York; London: W.W. Norton & Company.
Denton, D. (1963). Albert Camus and the Moral Dimensions of Education. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2008). Introduction: Critical methodologies and Indigenous inquiry. In N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln, & L.T. Smith, Handbook of critical and Indigenous methodologies (pp. 2 –20). Los Angeles; London: SAGE.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum Press.
Garcia-Moriyon, F., Robello, I., & Colom, R. (2005). Evaluating philosophy for children: A meta-analysis. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 17(4), 14–22.
Goralnik, L., Dobson, T., & Nelson, M.P. (2014). Place-based care Ethics: A field philosophy pedagogy., Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 180–196.
Grande, S. (2000). American Indian identity and intellectualism: The quest for a new Red pedagogy. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 343–360.
Graham, M. (1999). Some thoughts about the philosophical underpinnings of Aboriginal worldviews. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 3, 105–118.
Graham, M. (2013). The concept of ethics in Australian Aboriginal systems of thought. Custodial Navigator, 1–12. Retrieved from: http://www.indigenoussovereigntyaustralia.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/CustodialNavigator.pdf
Graham, M, (2014). Aboriginal notions of relationality and positionalism: A reply to Weber. Global Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs and Applied Contemporary Thought. 4(1), 17–22.
Graham, M. (2021). Aboriginal ethics: Australia becoming, Australia dreaming. Unpublished manuscript.
Gregory, M., & Granger, D. (2012). Introduction: John Dewey on philosophy and childhood. Education and Culture, 28, 1–25.
Hyde, D. (2016). Veronica Brady: A most curious theist. Veronica Brady Symposium, University of Western Australia, Perth.
Johnson, J.T. (2012). Place-based learning and knowing: Critical pedagogies grounded in Indigeneity. GeoJournal, 75(1), 829–836
Kudryavtsev, A., Stedman, R.C. & Krasny, M.E. (2012). Sense of place in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 229–250.
Knapp, C.E. (2005). The ‘I-thou’ relationship, place-based education, and Aldo Leopold. The Journal of Experiential Education, 27(3), 277–285.
Kohan, W.O. (2018). Paulo Freire and philosophy for children: A critical dialogue. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 37(6), 615–629.
Lipman, M. (2004). Philosophy for children’s debt to Dewey. Critical & Creative Thinking: The Australasian Journal of Philosophy in Education 12(1), 1–8.
Lipman, M., & Sharp, A. M. (1978). Some educational presuppositions of philosophy for children. Oxford Review of Education, 4, 85–90.
Lowan‐Trudeau, G. (2017). Narrating a critical Indigenous pedagogy of Place: A literary métissage. Educational Theory, 67(4), 509–525.
Mathews, F. (1991). The ecological self. London: Routledge.
Mathews, F. (2004). Letting the World Do the Doing. Australian Humanities Review, 1–10.
Mathews, F. (2008). Vale Val. Environmental Values, 17, 317–321.
Mill, J.S. (1859). On Liberty. London: John W. Parker & Sons.
Millett, S., & Tapper, A. (2011). Benefits of collaborative philosophical inquiry in schools. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 546–567.
Merchant, C. (2012). Women and Nature: Responding to the Call. In J. Bowersox & K. Arabas, (Eds.), Is Nature Calling? (pp. 1–13). Santa Rosa: Polebridge Press.
Moreton–Robinson, A. (2015). The white possessive property, power, and Indigenous sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Murris, K. (2016). The philosophy for children curriculum: Resisting ‘teacher proof’ texts and the formation of the ideal philosopher child. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 35, 63–78.
Nxumalo, F., & Cedillo, S. (2017). Decolonizing place in early childhood studies: Thinking with Indigenous onto-epistemologies and Black feminist geographies. Global Studies in Childhood, 72(2), 99–112.
Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London; New York: Routledge.
Plumwood, V. (1995). Has democracy failed ecology? An Ecofeminist perspective. Environmental Politics, 4(4), 134–168.
Plumwood, V. (2001). Nature as Agency and the Prospects for a Progressive Naturalism. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 12(4), 3–32.
Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. London; New York: Routledge.
Plumwood, V. (2008). Tasteless: Towards a food-based approach to death. Environmental Values, 17(3), 323–330.
Plumwood, V. (2012). The eye of the crocodile. L. Shannon (Ed.). ACT: ANU E Press.
Rainville, H. (2001). Philosophy for children in native America: A post-colonial critique. Analytic Teaching, 21(1), 65–77.
Renshaw, P., & Tooth, R. (Eds.) (2018). Diverse pedagogies of place: Educating Students in and for local and global environments. London: Routledge.
Ross, D., Oppegaard, B., & Willerton, R. (2019). Principles of place: Developing a place-based ethic for discussing, debating, and anticipating technical communication concerns, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications, 99, 1–23.
Russell, C.L. & Bell, A.C. (1996). A politicized ethic of care: Environmental education from an ecofeminist perspective. In K. Warren (Ed.), Women’s voices in experiential education (pp. 172–181). Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
Semali, L., & Kincheloe, J. (1999). What is Indigenous knowledge? Voices from the Academy. New York: Falmer Press.
Shaull, R. (1970). Foreword. In P. Freire, Pedagogy of the oppressed (pp. 29–34). London: Continuum.
Sylvan, R. (2009). Is there a need for a new, an environmental, ethic? In J.B. Callicott & R. Frodeman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of environmental ethics and philosophy (Vol. 2, pp. 484– 489). Macmillan Reference USA.
Thornton, S. (forthcoming 2022). Education in a time of environmental crisis: A philosophy of eco-rational education. London & New York: Routledge. [Page numbers refer to: Thornton, S. (2019). Disruptive philosophies: Eco-rational education and the epistemology of place. PhD Thesis. Brisbane: School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry, The University of Queensland. DOI: 10.14264/uql.2019.534]
Thornton, S., & Burgh, G. (2017). Making peace education everyone’s business. In C–C. Lin & L. Sequeira (Eds.), Inclusion, diversity and intercultural dialogue in young people’s philosophical inquiry (pp. 55–65). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Thornton, S., & Burgh, G. (2019). Growing up with philosophy in Australia: Philosophy as cultural discourse. In G. Burgh & S. Thornton (Eds.), Philosophical Inquiry with Children: The development of an inquiring society in Australia (pp. 335–249). Abingdon: Routledge.
Thornton, S., Graham, M., & Burgh, G. (2019). Reflecting on place: Environmental education as decolonisation. In D.R. Cole & K. Malone (Eds.), Environmental Education and Philosophy in the Anthropocene [Special issue], Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 35(3), 239–249.
Trickey, S., & Topping, K.J. (2004). Philosophy for children: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 365-380.
Topping, K.J., & Trickey, S. (2007a). Collaborative philosophical enquiry for school children: Cognitive gains at two-year follow-up. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 787–796.
Topping, K.J., & Trickey, S. (2007b). Impact of philosophical enquiry on school students’ interactive behaviour. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(2), 73–84.
Topping, K.J., & Trickey, S. (2007c). Collaborative philosophical enquiry for school children: Cognitive effects at 10-12 years. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 271–288.
Trickey, S., & Topping, K.J. (2006). Collaborative philosophical enquiry for school children: Socio-emotional effects at 10–12 Years. School Psychology International, 27(5), 599–614.
Trickey, S., & Topping, K.J. (2007). Collaborative philosophical enquiry for school children: Participant evaluation at 11–12 years. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 18(3), 23–34.
UNESCO (2007). Philosophy, a school of freedom: Teaching Philosophy and Learning to Philosophize: Status and Prospects. Paris: UNESCO.
Wildcat, M., McDonald, M., Irlbacher-Fox, S., & Coulthard, G. (2014). Learning from the land: Indigenous land based pedagogy and decolonization. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(3), i–xv.
