rompendo fronteiras: crianças ativistas como agentes epistêmicos dentro dos contornos da marginalização epistêmica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2024.80549Palavras-chave:
ativismo ambiental, crianças, agência epistêmica, marginalização epistêmica, capacidade epistêmicaResumo
Este artigo se aprofunda no campo do ativismo ambiental infantil, retratando-o como uma resposta conjunta que visa desafiar o status quo social e político predominante, o qual sistematicamente subestima o papel das crianças na tomada de decisões nas esferas políticas e sociais. Logo, destaca-se a importância primordial do marco epistemológico que engloba as experiências das crianças, enfatizando como excluí-las do discurso político e social conduz à marginalização epistêmica. Essa exclusão não só as impede que assumam o papel de agentes epistêmicos, como também as priva de agência e perpetua as desigualdades existentes. De um ponto de vista filosófico, o artigo propõe uma análise minuciosa da agência epistêmica das crianças, introduzindo o conceito de “capacidade epistêmica”. Afirma-se que, apesar da marginalização social, crianças que possuem conhecimentos podem se equipar com recursos epistêmicos para interpretar suas realidades e realizar mudanças. Além disso, considera-se que o ativismo ambiental desempenha um papel fundamental como recurso epistêmico para elas, facilitando a expressão de suas ideias, o questionamento das narrativas dominantes e o enfrentamento direto aos problemas ambientais e sociais. Nesse sentido, enfatiza-se o potencial transformador do ativismo como recurso epistêmico, permitindo uma participação substantiva e empoderando as crianças para navegar e transcender tais circunstâncias marginalizadas. Em conclusão, destaca-se como o ativismo ambiental infantil não apenas desafia o status quo, mas também oferece às crianças ferramentas fundamentais para seu desenvolvimento como agentes epistêmicos e sociais, promovendo mudanças significativas nas dinâmicas de poder e na luta pela justiça social e ambiental.
Downloads
Referências
Baraldi, C., & Iervese, V. (2014). Observing Children’s Capabilities as Agency. In D. Stoecklin, & J. M. Bonvin (Eds.), Children's Rights and the Capability Approach: Challenges and Prospects (8th ed., pp. 131–152). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9091-8_3
Bessant, J., Mejia Mesias, A., & Pickard, S. (2021). When Students Protest Secondary and High Schools. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Biggeri, M., Ballet, J., & Comim, F. (2011). Children and the Capability Approach. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230308374
Biggeri, M., & Santi, M. (2012). The Missing Dimensions of Children's Well-being and Well-becoming in Education Systems: Capabilities and Philosophy for Children. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13(3), 373-395. DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2012.694858
Biswas, T., & Mattheis, N. (2022). Strikingly educational: A childist perspective on children’s civil disobedience for climate justice. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(2), 145–157. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2021.1880390
Buhre, F. (2023). Child Figurations in Youth Climate Justice Activism: The Visual Rhetoric of the Fridays for Future on Instagram. In B. Sandin, J. Josefsson, K. Hanson, & S. Balagopalan (Eds.), The Politics of Children’s Rights and Representation. Studies in Childhood and Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04480-9_11
Carel, H., & Györffy, G. (2014). Seen but not heard: children and epistemic injustice. Lancet, 384(9950), 1256–1257. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61759-1
Clark, D., Biggeri, M., & Frediani, A. A. (2019). The Capability Approach, Empowerment and Participation Concepts, Methods and Applications. Palgrave Macmillan.
Catala, A. (2015). Democracy, Trust, and Epistemic Justice. The Monist, 98(4), 424-440. DOI:10.1093/monist/onv022
Conner, J. O., & Rosen, S. (2016). Contemporary youth activism: advancing social justice in the United States. Praeger.
Daly, A., & Lundy, L. (2022). Children´s Rights and Climate Justice. European Network of Ombudpersons for Children. Retrieved from https://enoc.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022-Synthesis-Report-Climate-Justice.pdf
Dufourt, P. (2024). The Philosophy for Children: Attempting a Pragmatist Approach to Knowledge Relations Guaranteeing the Recognition of the Child as an Epistemic Subject. Revue internationale de la didactique et des pratiques de la philosophie, 95, 2–8.
Engel, P. (2013). Is Epistemic Agency Possible? Philosophical Issues, 23(1), 158–178. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26382647
Florio, E., Caso, L., & Castelli, I. (2020). The Adultcentrism Scale in the educational relationship: Instrument development and preliminary validation. New Ideas of Psychology, 57. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0732118X19300170?via%3Dihub
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.
Fricker, M. (2015). Epistemic Contribution as a Central Capability. In George Hull (Ed.), The Equal Society. Essays on Equality in Theory and Practice (pp. 73–91). Lexington Books.
Gasparri, G., El Omrani, O., Hinton, R., Imbago, D., Lakhani, H., Mohan, A., Yeung, W., & Bustreo, F. (2021). Children, Adolescents, and Youth Pioneering a Human Rights-Based Approach to Climate Change. Health and Human Rights Journal, 23(2), pp. 95–108.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Hart, S. C., Biggeri, M., & Babic, B. (2015). Agency and Participation in Childhood and Youth International Applications of the Capability Approach in Schools and Beyond. Bloomsbury.
Hart, C. S., & Brando, N. (2018). A capability approach to children's well-being, agency and participatory rights in education. European Journal of Education, 53(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12284
Kapit, A. (2023). Activism under attack. Understanding the Repression of student activism. SAIH.
Kosko, S, J., Dastin, A., Merrill, M., & Sheth, R. (2022). Marginalised Youth Activism: Peer-Engaged Research and Epistemic Justice. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 23(1), 136-156. DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2021.2019691
Kotzee, B. (2017). Education and Epistemic Injustice. In I. James Kidd, J. Medina, & G. Pohlhaus Jr. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice (pp. 324–336). Routledge.
Liebel, M. (2012). Children’s Rights from Below: cross-cultural perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
Liebel, M.(2014a). Adultism and age-based discrimination against children. In D. Kutsar, & H. Warming (Eds.), Children and Non-Discrimination: Interdisciplinary Textbook (pp. 119–143). University Press of Estonia.
Liebel, M. (2014b). From evolving capacities to evolving capabilities: Contextualizing children’s rights. In D. Stoecklin, & J.-M. Bonvin (Eds.), Children’s Rights and the Capability Approach (Vol. 8, pp 67–84). Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9091-8_4
Livingstone, S., Kardefelt Winther, D., Kanchev, P., Cabello, P., Claro, M., Burton, P., & Phyfer, J. (2019). Is there a ladder of children’s online participation? Findings from three Global Kids Online countries. Innocenti Research Briefs, 2019(2), pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18356/99c54772-en
Majumdar, M., & Mooij, J. (2016). Cultivating Capabilities through Activism: Examples from India. The European Journal of Development Research, 28(4), 646-659.
Maldonado Castañeda, P. H. (2024). Activismo ambiental y democracia deliberativa: una aproximación desde el enfoque del “Children’s Capabilitarianism” y el “Childism”. Las Torres de Lucca. International Journal of Political Philosophy, 13(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.5209/ltdl.92457
McMellon, C., & Tisdall, E. K. M. (2020). Children and Young People’s Participation Rights: Looking Backwards and Moving Forwards. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 28(1), 157-182. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02801002
Medina, J., & Whitt, M. (2021). Epistemic Activism and the Politics of Credibility: Testimonial Injustice Inside/Outside a North Carolina Jail. In H. Grasswick, & N. McHugh (Eds.), Making the Case: Feminist and Critical Race Philosophers Engaging Case Studies (pp. 293–324). SUNY Press.
Neas, S., Ward, A., & Bowman, B. (2022). Young people’s climate activism: A review of the literature. Front. Polit. Sci, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.940876
Nieminen, J. H., & Ketonen, L. (2023). Epistemic agency: a link between assessment, knowledge and society. High Educ, 88, 777–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01142-5
Nielsen, L., & D. Axelsen. (2016). Capabilitarian Sufficiency: Capabilities and Social Justice. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2016.1145632
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge University Press.
Peleg, N. (2013). Reconceptualising the Child's Right to Development: Children and the Capability Approach. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 21, 523–542. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-02103003
Pickard, S., Bowman, B., & Arya, D. (2022). Youth and Environmental Activism. In M. Grasso, & M. Giugni (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Movements (pp. 521–537). Routledge.
Pohlhaus, G. (2012). Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Toward a Theory of Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance. Hypatia, 27(4), 715-735.
Robeyns, I. (2016). Capabilitarianism. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(3), 397–414. doi: 10.1080/19452829.2016.1145631
Robeyns, I., & Morten, F. B. (2023). The Capability Approach. In E. N. Zalta, & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2023 ed.). Standford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/capability-approach/
Sen, A. (1985). Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Knopf.
Simpson, L. (2021). Hermeneutics as critique: science, politics, race and culture. Columbia University Press.
Sosa, E. (2015). Judgment and Agency. Oxford University Press.
Stoecklin, D., & Fattore, T. (2018). Children's multidimensional agency: Insights into the structuration of choice. Childhood, 25(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568217743557
Taft, J. K., & Gordon, H. R. (2015). Intergenerational Relationships in Youth Activist Networks. In S. Punch., R. Vanderbeck, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Families, Intergenerationality, and Peer Group Relations. Geographies of Children and Young People (Vol. 5, pp. 1–21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-92-7_9-1
Taft, J. K., & O’Kane, C. (2023). Questioning children's activism: What is new or old in theory and practice? Children & Society, 38(3), 744–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12742
Tao, S. (2016). Transforming Teacher Quality in the Global South Using Capabilities and Causality to Re-examine Teacher Performance. Palgrave Macmillan
Teixeira, C. (2024). Youth, Protests and the Polycrisis. Innocenti Research Briefs. UNICEF Office of Research –Innocenti
Terzi, L. (2014). Reframing inclusive education: educational equality as capability equality. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(4), 479–493. DOI: 10.1080/0305764X.2014.960911
Tisdall, E., Kay M., & Cuevas-Parra, P. (2022). Beyond the familiar challenges for children and young people’s participation rights: the potential of activism. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(5), pp. 792–810. DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2021.1968377
Tisdall, E., Kay M., & McMellon, C. (2020). Children and Young People’s Participation Rights: Looking Backwards and Moving Forwards. International journal of children’s rights, 28, pp. 157–182.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989). Convention on the Rights of Child: United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/80135?v=pdf
Vitale, S., & Miller, O. (2020). Combatting Epistemic Violence against Young Activists. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 40(2), 1–16. Retrieved from https://journal.viterbo.edu/index.php/atpp/article/view/1179
Walker, M. (2019). Defending the Need for a Foundational Epistemic Capability in Education. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20(2), 218-232. DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2018.1536695
