About the Journal

Artes de Educar Interinstitutional Journal (RIAE) is a free and open access scientific online publication, maintained by the Graduate Programs in Education of the following Higher Education Institutions: Rio de Janeiro’s State University/Teacher Training College (UERJ/FFP), Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro/Multidisciplinary Institute-Institute of Education (UFRRJ/IM-IE) and the Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (Unirio). It’s mission is to nurture the art of pensarpraticar education by intertwining ethical, aesthetic and political movements.

The main goal of RIAE is to publicize the production of Brazilian and foreign researchers and teachers who address Education, resulting from research or experiences that contribute to the advancement of knowledge and practices with schools. Therefore, it is a journal that publishes thematic dossiers containing articles, essays, reviews, experience reports, among other contributions.

Thematic coverage is classified at CNPq as 7.00.00.00-0 Humanities; 7.08.00.00-6 Education. Publications will be subject to prior evaluation by the Editorial Committee and double blind review, two ad hoc reviewers (external to the publisher institutions). In case of divergence, a third opinion will be requested. Specific recourses and issues will be reviewed and decided upon by the Editorial Committee.

The selection of manuscripts for publication takes as basic criteria: the contribution to education and the editorial line of the Journal, the originality of the theme or the treatment given to it as well as the consistency of the theoretical-methodological approach.

Once structural or content modifications have been suggested by the reviewers or by the Editorial Committee, they must be incorporated by the authors into the manuscript as a condition for subsequent publication. The modifications made by the authors must be sent back to the section editors and, consequently, to the reviewers, so that they can conclude the evaluation process. In case the number of approved articles exceeds the publication capacity, the Editorial Committee will select the manuscripts with the best evaluations made by the ad hoc reviewers.

The ad hoc reviewers who are part of the panel of evaluators are professors-researchers who stand out for their work in the field of Education and who agree with RIAE's editorial policy.

Submitted manuscripts must have the evaluation process completed within a maximum of forty-five days. RIAE is a quarterly publication. Its publications are, in general, in the months of January, May and September, with each institution responsible for a volume. In addition, it may eventually publish special dossiers. This is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available at no cost to the user or their institution. Users are authorized to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link the complete texts of the two articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without the need to obtain prior authorization from the editor or author. This is in line with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access. (BOAI – Budapest Open Access Initiative). Interest conflicts
Conflicts usually arise when authors, editors or reviewers have interests that, apparent or not, influence the preparation or evaluation of manuscripts, which may be of a personal, commercial, political, academics or financial nature. Public trust in the peer review process and the credibility of published articles depends, in parts, on how these conflicts of interest are managed during writing, peer review, and decision making by editors.

When submitting a manuscript, the authors are responsible for recognizing and disclosing conflicts of a financial nature or of a different nature that influenced the work. That means they must acknowledge, in the manuscript, all financial support for the work and other financial or personal connections related to the research.

There is also a conflict of interest when the manuscript is based on a thesis or dissertation. In this case, it is necessary to indicate the name of the author, the title, the year, the name of the graduate program and the institution where the works were presented.

When evaluating, the reviewer must disclose to the section editors any conflicts of interest that, perhaps, may influence his/her opinion about the manuscript, and, when applicable, must declare himself/herself unqualified to evaluate it.

If the authors are not sure what might constitute a potential conflict of interest, they should contact the Journal's editorial team.

Publication Ethics and Declaration on Bad Practices
It is the responsibility of the authors, reviewers and editors involved in the editorial process to preserve ethics in range with scientific principles.

It is up to Artes de Educar Interinstitutional Journal (RIAE) to maintain the ethics and quality of published texts, with its guidelines in accordance with:

• The policies of good editorial practices indicated by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)https://publicationethics.org/core-practices
• The Research Integrity Commission Report of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) http://cnpq.br/documentos-da-ciac/
• The rules of the ethics commission of Rio de Janeiro’s State University (UERJ): http://www.sr2.uerj.br/sr2/coep/index.php?mod=regulamenta.htm
• Ethics and Research in Education document – v. 1 (Anped):.

Authors:
In articles and experience reports, the authors must present an objective discussion about the research or about the reported experience, exposing sufficient details and references about the study. Statements endowed with fraud or inaccuracy constitute unethical behavior, therefore, they are unacceptable. Reviews must also be objective, comprehensive and accurately take into account the state of the art. The authors must ensure that their work is entirely original and that they properly present their references, in order not to be considered a copy of someone else’s work. After all, plagiarism in all its forms is unethical and unacceptable. Likewise, submitting the same manuscript to more than one Journal also constitutes unethical and unacceptable behavior. Authors should not submit manuscripts that describe substantially the same research to more than one journal. The author responsible for submitting the production must also ensure that all co-authors accept the final version and its submission for publication. Furthermore, aiming to blind evaluation, there should be no reference to the authors in the body of the submitted manuscript.

Editors:
Section editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively based on their academic merit; under no circumstances should they use unpublished information in their own research without the express consent of the authors. Editors must take reasonable and responsive action in the event of complaints regarding a submitted or published manuscript. The editors are co-responsible for conducting the blind evaluation process, ensuring that there are no references to the authors in the text forwarded to the reviewers.

Reviewers:
Reviewers should evaluate each manuscript received as a confidential document. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and may not be used for personal advantage. The evaluations must be carried out in an objective way, and the observations must be clearly formulated with reasoned arguments, so that the authors can use them for improvement of their manuscripts. If a selected reviewer feels disqualified or unable to carry out an evaluation, he/she must promptly notify the editor. Reviewers should not accept manuscripts for analysis if they have any conflict of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative or any other type of relationship.

Tendências	2019	2020	2021	2022	2023
Edições	3	5	3	4	1
Artigos	35	62	82	61	18
Total de itens publicados	55	128	105	81	27
Total de submissões	174	324	190	315	240
Avaliados pelos pares	153	288	138	154	17
Aceito	110 (72%)	179 (62%)	111 (80%)	113 (73%)	12 (71%)
Rejeitado	43 (28%)	109 (38%)	27 (20%)	41 (27%)	5 (29%)
Tempo de avaliação	49	95	0	90	51
Tempo até a publicação	84	156	55	93	13
Acessos	30.191	57.454	94.925	61.292	21.423

Edital FAPERJ Nº 48/2021- APOIO À PUBLICAÇÃO DE PERIÓDICOS CIENTÍFICOS E TEC. E À INFRAESTRUTURA DE EDITORAS - 2021 Atividades em curso desde setembro de 2022.

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - Hospedagem, financiamento do Digital Object Identifier (DOI) e orientações editoriais.