TODOS SÃO IGUAIS PERANTE OS PRECEDENTES: TUTELA JURISDICIONAL EFETIVA, VINCULAÇÃO A PRECEDENTES E DISTINÇÃO DO CASO CONCRETO SOB A ÓTICA DO DIREITO FUNDAMENTAL À IGUALDADE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2024.81907Abstract
This research aims to analyze the functionality of the precedent system from the perspective of the fundamental right to effective judicial protection in the Brazilian legal system, with special attention to the content of the Recommendation of the National Council of Justice (CNJ) nº 134/2022 with regard to regulation of the treatment of precedents by the bodies of the Judiciary. It results in the presentation of a set of argumentative mechanisms involved in applying precedents to concrete cases. It is necessary to understand that effective judicial protection needs to be offered to those under jurisdiction through vigorous action by the Judiciary, and among all the objectives embraced by the current Brazilian legal system, a special highlight and of fundamental relevance is its intervention as a way of perfecting respect for the fundamental right to equality, as analyzed in this research. Due to the fundamental right to non-detachability from judicial control, it is the State's responsibility to provide appropriate resolutions to individuals who place their concerns before the Judiciary, in a way that enables their response through a fair process. According to the recommendation of CNJ nº 134, it is possible not only to analyze this concept of fair process, but also the relationship of this fundamental right with that of equality, and the link to precedents, adding this to the necessary understanding of the distinction of the precedents themselves as a manifestation the right to equality through the legal system. Using the deductive method with systematic interpretation, this analysis results in a series of models that indicate the existence of a strong relationship between the effectiveness of judicial protection and respect for the fundamental right to equality. That is, in countries where the civil law system is adopted, respect for precedents does not entail an affront to any fundamental rights or guarantees inherent to the respective legal systems. Adopting a contrary view, what is understood is that Brazilian law therefore adopts this binding technique in order to ensure the effective fulfillment of the fundamental right to equality.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Luis Alberto Reichelt, Hannah Pereira Alff
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todos os artigos publicados na Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual (REDP) (Departamento de Direito Processual, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) são licenciados por meio de uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais de seu artigo e concordam em licenciar seu trabalho com a licença CC BY 4.0, aceitando assim os termos e condições específicos desta licença disponíveis no seguinte website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
- Os autores concedem à REDP o direito de primeira publicação, de se identificar como publicadora original do trabalho e concedem à revista uma licença de direitos não exclusivos para utilizar o trabalho das seguintes formas: Reproduzir, vender e distribuir cópias eletrônicas ou impressas do manuscrito como um todo, de partes específicas do manuscrito e de suas traduções para qualquer idioma;
- O uso do artigo por terceiros é livre, contanto que a integridade da publicação seja mantida e seus autores originais, periódico de primeira publicação e detalhes de citação sejam identificados.
Dentro dos termos da licença, os autores podem entrar em acordos contratuais adicionais separados para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada do trabalho na revista.
Copyright and Licensing
All articles published in the Procedural Law Electronic Review (REDP) (Department of Procedural Law, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) are licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors retain copyright to their article and agree to license their work under the CC BY 4.0 license, thereby accepting the specific terms and conditions of this license available at the following website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ legal code.
- Authors grant REDP the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher of the work, and grant the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: Reproduce, sell and distribute electronic or printed copies of the manuscript as a whole, of specific parts of the manuscript and its translations into any language;
- Use of the article by third parties is free, as long as the integrity of the publication is maintained and its original authors, first publication journal, and citation details are identified.
Within the terms of the license, authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in the journal.