DEMOCRATIC PLEA BARGAINING? FROM TORTURE TO DUE PROCESS OF INQUISITORIAL BARGAINING LAW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2022.64389Keywords:
Plea Bargaining, Torture, Criminal Procedure, Inquisitive SystemAbstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze the issue of voluntariness to a confession of guilt in the criminal process, central point in the current doctrinal construction by the treaph of plea bargaining throughout the world. Therefore, it is essential to reiterate the extent to which voluntariness plays a prominent role in criminal proceedings, so as to be able to see beyond what can be tried to regulate, and whether there really is a possibility of a guarantee against wrongdoing, or literally this construction already works with the acceptance of a high (very high) level of misconduct. Thus, in this quest for the obscene penalty, we use the work “Discourse of voluntary servitude”, in which La Boétie masterfully exposes this unnatural desire for servitude of man, which seems to bring important reflections of this remarkable advance of the plea bargaining around the world, without resistance, and second, to deconstruct any perspective that the institute offers any sign of desire for confession in the process, but only the systemic construction to a greater or lesser degree of coercion in a space that should aspire to democracy.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Todos os artigos publicados na Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual (REDP) (Departamento de Direito Processual, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) são licenciados por meio de uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais de seu artigo e concordam em licenciar seu trabalho com a licença CC BY 4.0, aceitando assim os termos e condições específicos desta licença disponíveis no seguinte website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
- Os autores concedem à REDP o direito de primeira publicação, de se identificar como publicadora original do trabalho e concedem à revista uma licença de direitos não exclusivos para utilizar o trabalho das seguintes formas: Reproduzir, vender e distribuir cópias eletrônicas ou impressas do manuscrito como um todo, de partes específicas do manuscrito e de suas traduções para qualquer idioma;
- O uso do artigo por terceiros é livre, contanto que a integridade da publicação seja mantida e seus autores originais, periódico de primeira publicação e detalhes de citação sejam identificados.
Dentro dos termos da licença, os autores podem entrar em acordos contratuais adicionais separados para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada do trabalho na revista.
Copyright and Licensing
All articles published in the Procedural Law Electronic Review (REDP) (Department of Procedural Law, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) are licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors retain copyright to their article and agree to license their work under the CC BY 4.0 license, thereby accepting the specific terms and conditions of this license available at the following website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ legal code.
- Authors grant REDP the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher of the work, and grant the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: Reproduce, sell and distribute electronic or printed copies of the manuscript as a whole, of specific parts of the manuscript and its translations into any language;
- Use of the article by third parties is free, as long as the integrity of the publication is maintained and its original authors, first publication journal, and citation details are identified.
Within the terms of the license, authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in the journal.
