UNVEILING THE CORDIAL INQUISITORITY: AN SOCIO-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURE MODEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2022.60379Keywords:
social security procedure, construction of truths, management of evidence, poverty, inquisitivenessAbstract
If, in the dogmatic field of criminal procedure, the theoretical discussion about procedural models is unequivocal and current, in the "new" social security procedural field, such discussion is still incipient and little stimulated by the doctrine. In view of this theoretical gap, we prepared this article, whose objective is to analyze the treatment given by the doctrine of social security procedural law to the themes of the construction of truths and the management of evidence, and we seek to answer the following synthesis question: the social security process is inquisitorial or accusatory? In order to reach the proposed objective and answer the research question, we used as a methodological strategy the document analysis of technical-legal manuals of social security procedural law, which, here, are taken as a material object of analysis. Furthermore, we compare this material with civil and criminal procedural doctrines and with several socio-anthropological empirical research carried out in Brazilian judicial institutions. With the investigation, it was demonstrated that the procedural model inscribed in the social security procedural doctrine analyzed is clearly inquisitorial. Finally, it was concluded that this process model aligns the formal discourse of the right with the benevolent and charitable discourse of "protection" of the "undersufficient", contributing to the reproduction of what we call cordial inquisitoriality in social security procedural practices.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Todos os artigos publicados na Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual (REDP) (Departamento de Direito Processual, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) são licenciados por meio de uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais de seu artigo e concordam em licenciar seu trabalho com a licença CC BY 4.0, aceitando assim os termos e condições específicos desta licença disponíveis no seguinte website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
- Os autores concedem à REDP o direito de primeira publicação, de se identificar como publicadora original do trabalho e concedem à revista uma licença de direitos não exclusivos para utilizar o trabalho das seguintes formas: Reproduzir, vender e distribuir cópias eletrônicas ou impressas do manuscrito como um todo, de partes específicas do manuscrito e de suas traduções para qualquer idioma;
- O uso do artigo por terceiros é livre, contanto que a integridade da publicação seja mantida e seus autores originais, periódico de primeira publicação e detalhes de citação sejam identificados.
Dentro dos termos da licença, os autores podem entrar em acordos contratuais adicionais separados para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada do trabalho na revista.
Copyright and Licensing
All articles published in the Procedural Law Electronic Review (REDP) (Department of Procedural Law, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) are licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors retain copyright to their article and agree to license their work under the CC BY 4.0 license, thereby accepting the specific terms and conditions of this license available at the following website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ legal code.
- Authors grant REDP the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher of the work, and grant the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: Reproduce, sell and distribute electronic or printed copies of the manuscript as a whole, of specific parts of the manuscript and its translations into any language;
- Use of the article by third parties is free, as long as the integrity of the publication is maintained and its original authors, first publication journal, and citation details are identified.
Within the terms of the license, authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in the journal.
