Aquafaba obtained from chickpea cooking: Chemical characterization, standardization of use and viability in a recipe

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/demetra.2021.55115

Keywords:

Cicer. Food Technology Coadjuvants. Diet, Vegan.

Abstract

Introduction: Aquafaba is a by-product of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) that may represent an interesting alternative for providing foam formation, at the same time as being a vegetal ingredient that has pleasant physicochemical and sensory characteristics in culinary vegan recipes. Objective: Standardize the homemade process to obtain aquafaba, with the aim of using it in vegan recipes. Material and Methods: After soaking chickpeas overnight, different proportions of chickpea and water (v/v) were used during the cooking process, in six experiments. The homemade aquafaba samples were analyzed with regard to foam formation and stability, and the results were compared to those of egg white, in order to determine the best proportion of grain:water for developing a vegan chocolate mousse. The samples of standard (egg white) and vegan (aquafaba) mousse went through an acceptability test using a 9-point structured hedonic scale (n= 95 untrained tasters). Results: The foam obtained from egg white presented lower stability (p<0.05), while the aquafaba obtained from a 2:3 grain:water proportion formed foam more quickly, when compared to that obtained from other experiments. This same sample did not present any significant difference in foam formation and stability, compared to the other samples and was selected for the vegan mousse preparation, which did not differ in terms of flavor (p>0.05) and presented better means in the other features evaluated, when compared to standard mousse (p<0.05). Conclusion: The homemade chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) aquafaba obtained from a 2:3 proportion of grain:water (v/v) presented viability for culinary application in vegan mousse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Clarys P, Deliens T, Huybrechts I, Deriemaeker P, Vanaelst B, Keyzer WD, et al. Comparison of Nutritional Quality of the Vegan, Vegetarian, Semi-Vegetarian, Pesco-Vegetarian and Omnivorous Diet. Nutrients. 2014;(6):1318-1332. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6031318.

Dyett PA, Sabaté J, Haddad E, Rajaram S, Shavlik D. Vegan Lifestyle behaviours. An exploration of congruence with health-related beliefs and assessed health indices. Appetite. 2013;67(1):119-124. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.03.015

Inteligência I. 14% da populacão se declara vegetariana. 2018. Disponível em:https://www.ibopeinteligencia.com/noticias-e-pesquisas/14-da-populacao-se-declara-vegetariana/.

Hargreaves SM, Araújo WMC, Nakano EY, Zandonadi RP. Brazilian vegeterians diet quality markers and comparison with the general population: A nationwide cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2020 may 12; 15(5). Erratum in: PLoS One. 2020 Jul 6; 15(7):e0235991. PMID: 32396556; PMCID: PMC7217440. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232954.

Mustafa R, He Y, Shim YY, Reaney MJT. Aquafaba, wastewater from chickpea canning, function as an egg replacer in sponge cake. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.13813.

Stadelman W, Schmeider H. In: Eggs and Health Promotion. (edited by Watson RR). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. 2002: 3–8. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470376973.ch1

Arozarena I, Bertholo H, Empis J, Bunger A, Sousa I. Study of the total replacement of egg by white lupine protein, emulsifier and xanthan gum in yellow cakes. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2001; 213:312–316. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002170100391.

Kohrs D, Herald TJ, Aramouni FM & Abughoush M. Evaluation of egg replacers in a yellow cake system. Emir. J. Food. Agric. 2010; 22:340–352. Doi: https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.v22i5.4822.

Shao Y, Lin K, Chen Y. Batter and product quality of eggless cakes made of different types of flours and gums. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2015; 39: 2959–2968. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12547.

Sharif HR, Williams PA, Sharif MK, Abbas S, Majeed H, Massamba KG, et al. Current progress in the utilization of native and modified legume proteins as emulsifiers and encapsulants - A review. Food Hydrocoll. 2017 Mar; 76: 2-16 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.01.002.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Food loss analysis: causes and solutions. Case study on the chickpea value chain in the Republic of India. Rome, 2018. ISBN 978-92-5-130669-7

Sánchez-Vioque R, Clemente A, Vioque J, Bautista J, Millán F. Protein Isolates from Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): Chemical Composition, Functional Properties and Protein Characterization. Food Chem. 1999; 64; 237-243. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00133-2.

Meurer MC, Souza DD, Marczak LDF. Effects of ultrasound on technological properties of chickpea cooking water (aquafaba). J. Food Eng. 2020 Jan; 265. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.109688

Green AJ, Littlejohn KA, Hooley P, Cox PW. Formation and stability of food foams and aerated emulsions: Hydrophobins as novel functional ingredients. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013 Aug; 18(4): 292-301. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2013.04.008

Alleoni, ACC. Albumen protein and functional properties of gelation and foaming. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Brazil). 2006 May/Jun; 63(3): 291-298. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162006000300013

Foegeding EA, Luck PJ, Davis JP. Factors determining the physical properties of protein foams. Food Hydrocoll. 2006; Mar/May; 20(2-3): 294-292. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2005.03.014

Buhl TF, Christensen CH, Hammershoj M. Aquafaba as an egg white substitute in food foams and emulsions: Protein composition and functional behavior. Food Hydrocoll. 2019; 96:354-364. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.05.041

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. 16th Edn. AOAC International, Washington, DC, 1141p, 1995. ISBN 0935584544

Brasil. Resolução RDC n.360, de 23 de dezembro de 2003. A Diretoria Colegiada da ANVISA/MS aprova o regulamento técnico sobre rotulagem nutricional de alimentos embalados. Diário Oficial da União. 2003 26 dez; (251):33; Seção 1.

Lim J. Hedonic scaling: A review of methods and theory. Food Qual. Prefer. 2011 Dec; 22(8):733-747. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.05.008.

Department of Agriculture (US). Agricultural Research Service. United States Department of Agriculture. FoodData Central, 2019. Disponível em fdc.nal.usda.gov.

Rehman Z-U, Shah WH. Domestic processing effects on some insoluble dietary fibre components of various food legumes. Food Chem. 2004; 87(4): 613-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.01.012.

Ferreira ACP, Canniatti-Brazaca SG, Arthur V. Alterações químicas e nutricionais do grão-de-bico (Cicer arietinum L.) cru e irradiado e submetido à cocção. Ciênc. Tecnol. Aliment. 2006 Jan/Mar; 26(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612006000100014.

Silva MO, Brigide P, Canniatti-Brazaca SG. Composição de cultivares de feijão comum. Alim. Nutr. = Braz. J. Food Nutr. 2013 Jul/Set; 24(3): 339-346. ISSN 2179-4448 on line.

Lomakina K, Miková K. A study of the factors affecting the foaming properties of egg white – a review. Czech J. Food Sci. 2006; 24(3): 110-118. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17221/3305-cjfs

Everitt M. Consumer-Targeted Sensory Quality. Global Issues in Food Science and Technology. 2009; 117-128. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374124-0.00008-9.

Published

2021-06-29

How to Cite

1.
Landert MD, Zaminelli CX, Capitani CD. Aquafaba obtained from chickpea cooking: Chemical characterization, standardization of use and viability in a recipe. DEMETRA [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 29 [cited 2025 May 15];16:e55115. Available from: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/demetra/article/view/55115

Issue

Section

Science and Food Technology