diálogos filosóficos sobre os cuentos de fadas de hans christian andersen. um estudo de caso de manuais de fpc
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2021.54386Palavras-chave:
materias de ensino, diálogo filosófico, per jespersen, hans christian andersen, contos de fadas.Resumo
Na Dinamarca, ensinar os famosos contos de fadas de Hans Christian Andersen representa um desafio na educação primária porque o status de herança cultural e leituras simplificadas tornam difícil envolver os alunos em leituras autênticas. Uma estratégia pode ser usar diálogos filosóficos das tradições da filosofia para crianças, porque eles oferecem abordagens centradas no estudante, em que eles exploram questões e ideias juntos, onde o professor assume o papel não como autoridade, mas como facilitador do diálogo. Este tipo de ensino dialógico foi fomentado por ser especialmente adequado para a educação literária, em que os professores visam envolver os estudantes na leitura da literatura com uma mente aberta. No entanto, este artigo apresenta um estudo de caso comparativo dos materiais produzidos por um dos pioneiros da FpC, Per Jespersen, para diálogos filosóficos e contos de fadas de Hans Christian Andersen. Nosso estudo dá motivos para ser cautelosos Analisamos o design das perguntas nos manuais de contos de fadas e os comparamos com os manuais das próprias histórias de Jespersen, e descobrimos que o design de questionamento nos manuais de suas próprias histórias é geralmente muito mais focado e acessível, com base em questões conceitualmente abertas. Argumentamos que isso indica que, apesar de seus ideais dialógicos, o design dos manuais de contos de fadas desmorona sob o peso do impacto cultural e histórico de Hans Christian Andersen e sua obra na Dinamarca.
Downloads
Referências
Adler, M. J. (1984). The Paideia Program: An educational syllabus. New York: Macmillan.
Adorno, T. W. (1992). "On Tradition." Telos 94: 75-82.
Alexander, R. (2017). Towards Dialogic Teaching. Cambridge: Dialogos.
Bom, A. K. & C. Schaffalitzky de Muckadell (2019). "Is the Ugly Duckling a Hero? Philosophical Inquiry as an approach to Hans Christian Andersen's fairy tales in Danish primary school teaching." Forum for World Literature Studies 11(2): 226-241.
Bom, A. K. & C. Schaffalitzky de Muckadell (2020). "National icons in education: Hans Christian Andersen and the cultural policy of the canon of Danish literature." International Journal of Cultural Policy.
Boyd, M. P. & W. C. Markarian (2011). "Dialogic teaching: Talk in service of a dialogic stance." Language and Education 25(6): 515–534.
Cam, P. (2006). Twenty Thinking Tools. Collaborative Inquiry for the Classroom. Victoria: ACER Press.
Carroll, L. & J. Tenniel (1865). Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. London: Macmillan.
de Saint-Exupery, A. (1943). Le Petite Prince: Reynal & Hitchcock
Goering, S. (2014). "Using Children's Literature as a Spark for Ethical Discussion: Stories that Deal with Death". Ethics and Children's Literature. C. Mills. Farnham: Ashgate: 233-246.
Gregory, M. R., et al., Eds. (2017). The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children. New York: Routledge.
Haynes, J. & K. Murris (2017). "Readings and Readers of Texts in Philosophy for Children". The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children. M. R. Gregory, J. Haynes & K. Murris. London: Routledge: 171-188.
Hinge, H. (2016). "Filosofi med børn". Religionsdidaktik. M. Buchardt. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag: 203-216.
Jespersen, P. (1988). Filosofi med børn: en udfordring: Krogh.
Jespersen, P. (1993). Filosofi med børn: en let indføring: OP.
Jespersen, P. (2005). Hans Christian Andersen’s tales and Philosophy for Children: With manuals by Per Jespersen,. Avaliable on Jespersen's website: https://sites.google.com/site/p4cp4c/hanschristianandersen. Last accessed: June 12 2021.
Jespersen, P. (n.d.-a). Deeptales. Here are eight deeptales with manuals for the teacher. Available on Jespersen's website: https://sites.google.com/site/p4cp4c/deeptales Last Accessed: 12 jun 2021.
Jespersen, P. (n.d.-b). Mark and Deena. Here are eight philosophical stories with manuals. They are all written by Per Jespersen, who has published stories all over the world. Available in: https://sites.google.com/site/p4cp4c/markanddeena Accessed in: 12 jun 2021.
Jespersen, P. (n.d.-c). Philosophy for Kids. Redemptional Pedagogics. Available in: https://sites.google.com/site/p4cp4c/philosophyforkids Last accessed: 12 jun 2021.
Kiilerich, M. V. & M. S. Mogensen (2020). "Philosophical Dialogue on ‘The Girl Who Trod on the Loaf’." Section for learning activities, Hans Christian Andersen Museum.
Kohan, W. O. (2014). Philosophy and Childhood. Critical Perspectives and Affirmative Practices. New York: Palgrave.
Lyle, S. (2008). "Dialogic Teaching: Discussing Theoretical Contexts and Reviewing Evidence from Classroom Practice." Language and Education 22(3): 222-240.
Mendonça, D. & M. Costa-Carvalho (2019). "The Richness of Questions in Philosophy for Children." Childhood & Philosophy 15: 1-21.
Mudryk, M. (2020). Guidelines and Questions for Philosophical Discussion: The Emperor's New Clothes. Available in: https://www.prindleinstitute.org/books/the-emperors-new-clothes/ Last accessed: August 5 2021.
Murris, K. (2014). "Reading Philosophically in a Community of Enquiry: Challenging Developmentality with Oram and Kitamura’s Angry Arthur." Children's Literature in Education 45: 145–165.
Murris, K. (2016). "Philosophy with Picturebooks". Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. M. A. Peters. Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media: 2-7.
Naji, S. (2017). "P4C in Denmark". History, Theory and Practice of Philosophy for Children: International Perspectives. S. Naji & R. Hashim. New York: Routledge: 143-149.
Nystrand, M. (1997). "What's a Teacher to Do? Dialogism in the Classroom". Opening Dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English schoolroom. M. Nystrand. New York: Teachers College Press: 89-108.
Nystrand, M. (2006). "Research on the Role of Classroom Discourse as It Affects Reading Comprehension." Research in the Teaching of English 40(4): 392-412.
Nystrand, M. & A. Gamoran (1991a). "Instructional Discourse, Student Engagement, and Literature Achievement." Research in the Teaching of English 25(3): 261-290.
Nystrand, M. & A. Gamoran (1991b). "Student Engagement: When Recitation Becomes Conversation". Contemporary Research on Teaching: Current Research. H. C. Waxman & H. J. Walberg. California: McCuthan.
Pihlgren, A. S. (2008). Socrates in the Classroom. Rationales and effects of philosophizing with children. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Reznitskaya, A. & M. Glina (2013). "Comparing Student Experiences with Story Discussions in Dialogic Versus Traditional Settings." The Journal of Educational Research 106(1): 49-63.
Smith, J. (2017). "Negotiating meaning in classrooms: P4C as an examplar of dialogic pedagogy". Philosophy for Children: Theories and praxis in teacher education. B. Anderson. London: Routledge: 46-54.
Thomsen , T. B. (2017). "Vi have intet at hovmode os over: Den anti-antropocentriske Andersen." Passage 77.
Tunbridge, J. & G. J. Ashworth (1996). Dissonant Heritage: The management of the past as a resource in conflict. Chichester: Wiley.
Vansieleghem, N. & D. Kennedy, Eds. (2011). Special Issue: Philosophy for Children in Transition: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Philosophy of Education 45(2).
Välitalo, R., Juuso, H., & Sutinen, A. (2016). "Philosophy for Children as an Educational Practice." Studies in Philosophy and Education 35(1): 79–92.
Wartenberg, T. E. (2014). Big Ideas for Little Kids: Teaching Philosophy through Children's Literature. Lanham MA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Weber, B. & A. Wolf (2017). "Questioning the Question. A hermeneutical perspective on the 'art of questioning' in a community of philosophical inquiry". The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children. M. R. Gregory, J. Haynes & K. Murris. London: Routledge: 74-82.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry : Towards a Socio-cultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Worley, P. (2015). "Open thinking, closed questioning: Two kinds of open and closed question." Journal of Philosophy in Schools 2(2): 17-29.
