atentividade, qualidades da escuta e o ouvinte na comunidade de investigação filosófica

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2023.76451

Palavras-chave:

escuta, investigação, atentividade, facilitação, prática

Resumo

Esse artigo busca reparar o foco predominante na fala, em detrimento da escuta, na teorização da Comunidade de Investigação Filosófica (CIF). Frequentemente, quando as habilidades da escuta estão em debate, o foco é encorajar as crianças a serem ouvintes ativos. Essa forma de descrever a escuta que ocorre na Comunidade de Investigação Filosófica (CIF) tem perdido a eficácia, visto que a linguagem da escuta ativa tem sido cooptada como uma técnica de gestão centrada em fazer o falante se sentir ouvido, com pouca ênfase na intenção e nos efeitos para o ouvinte. Assim, numa leitura cínica, ‘escuta ativa’ pode ser reduzida a indicadores físicos performativos de escuta (como contato visual e linguagem corporal), ignorando os compromissos éticos-epistêmicos do ouvinte genuinamente engajado. Em vez de formular novos termos para descrever a escuta, proponho aqui a descrição da atenção feita por Iris Murdoch como um descritor adequado dos efeitos no self de uma escuta verdadeiramente envolvida, que procura atender ao desdobramento do conteúdo da CIF, e também como uma forma de caracterizar as qualidades de uma CIF em que essa escuta é alcançada. Aqui, a atentividade é apresentada como um conceito que captura as facetas únicas da escuta como um desafio para os indivíduos que participam dela e se preocupam em contribuir efetivamente para o diálogo que se desenvolve ao longo da CIF e para aqueles que facilitam esse diálogo. São exploradas brevemente algumas implicações no contexto prático, propondo três intervenções para cultivar a atentividade nos participantes da CIF e nos facilitadores (especialmente se forem graduados ou pós-graduados em filosofia, porque a identidade filosófica pode se tornar um obstáculo à atentividade). Em sua conclusão, esse artigo reposiciona a escuta na CIF como um risco produtivo, com uma forma particular de ‘vivacidade’ habilmente capturada pelo termo atenção.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

lucy elvis, Universidade de Galway

Lucy Elvis é professora de filosofia e estudos infantis na Universidade de Galway. Ela coordena seus módulos de Projeto de Diálogo Filosófico, atividades de pesquisa e extensão baseadas na Comunidade de Investigação Filosófica. Ela é fundadora da Curo, uma organização sem fins lucrativos que trabalha com organizações artísticas, bibliotecas e outros órgãos para ajudar as comunidades a pensarem juntas de forma eficaz.

Referências

Butnor, Ashby. (2004). “Bringing P4C Into the Undergraduate Classroom.” Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 17(1/2), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.5840/thinking2004171/224.

Chetty, Darren, & Suissa, Judith. (2016). “‘No Go Areas’: Racism and Discomfort in the Community of Inquiry.” In Maughn Rollins Gregory, Karin Murris, & Joanna Haynes (Eds.). The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children (44–51). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726625-12.

Davey, Nicholas. (2013). Unfinished Worlds: Hermeneutics, Aesthetics and Gadamer. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Fiumara, Gemma Corradi. (2013). The Other Side of Language: A Philosophy of Listening. London: Routledge.

Fletcher, Natalie M. (2020). “Underestimated No More.” In Claire Elise Katz (Ed.), Growing Up with Philosophy Camp: How Learning to Think Develops Friendship, Community, and a Sense of Self (65–86). Big Ideas for Young Thinkers. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Fredriksson, Antony & Panizza, Silvia . (2022). Ethical Attention and the Self in Iris Murdoch and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 53(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2020.1836978.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (2000). “Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity, Subject and Person.” Translated by David Vesey and Peter Adamson. Continental Philosophy Review 33(3), 275–87.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (2006). A Century of Philosophy: Hans-Georg Gadamer in Conversation with Riccardo Dottori. Translated by Rod Coltman. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (2013). Truth and Method. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. Bloomsbury Revelations. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. (Original work published in 1975).

Gardner, Susan. (1996). Inquiry Is No Mere Conversation (or Discussion or Dialogue): Facilitation of Inquiry Is Hard Work! Analytic Teaching, 16(2), 102–11.

Gregory, Maughn Rollins. (2007). A Framework for Facilitating Classroom Dialogue.” Teaching Philosophy, 30(1), 59–84. https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil200730141.

Hellman, John. (2014). Simone Weil: An Introduction to Her Thought. Ontario: Wipf and Stock.

Honneth, Axel. (2003). On the Destructive Power of the Third: Gadamer and Heidegger’s Doctrine of Intersubjectivity. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 29(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453703029001830.

Jalongo, Mary Renck. (1995). Promoting Active Listening in the Classroom. Childhood Education, 72(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1995.10522637.

James, William. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: H. Holt.

Kennedy, David. (1990). Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Dialectic of Dialogue and the Epistemology of the Community of Inquiry. Analytic Teaching, 11(1). http://journal.viterbo.edu/index.php/at/article/view/529.

Kennedy, David. (1997). The Five Communities. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 16(4), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews19971647.

Kennedy, David. (2004). The Role of a Facilitator in a Community of Philosophical Inquiry. Metaphilosophy 35(5), p. 744–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00348.x.

Kennedy, David. (2010). Philosophical Dialogue with Children: Essays on Theory and Practice. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.

Laverty, Megan J. (2016). Philosophy for Children and Listening Education: An Ear for Thinking. In Leonard J. Waks. Listening to Teach: Beyond Didactic Pedagogy (p. 53–68). New York: SUNY Press.

Lewin, David. (2014). Behold: Silence and Attention in Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48(3), 355–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12074.

Lipman, Matthew. (1995). Caring as Thinking. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines. February 1, 1995. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews199515128.

Lipman, Matthew. (2003). Thinking in Education. London: Cambridge University Press.

McCall, Catherine C. & Weijers, Ed. (2016). Back to Basics: A Philosophical Analysis of Philosophy With Children. In Maughn Rollins Gregory, Karin Murris, and Joanna Haynes (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children (p. 84–92). London: Routledge.

Miles, Siân. (2005). Introduction. In Siân Miles (Ed.), Simone Weil: An Anthology, by Simone Weil (p. 1–68). Modern Classics. London: Penguin.

Murdoch, Iris. (1999a). Against Dryness. In Peter Conradi (Ed.), Existentialists and Mystics : Writings on Philosophy and Literature (p. 287–95). London: Penguin.

Murdoch, Iris. (1999b). The Idea of Perfection. In Peter Conradi (Ed.), Existentialists and Mystics: Writings on Philosophy and Literature (299–336). London: Penguin.

Murdoch, Iris. (1999c). “The Sublime and the Good.” In Peter Conradi (Ed.), Existentialists and Mystics, Wirtings on Philosophy and Literature (205–34). London: Penguin.

Murdoch, Iris. 2014. The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge. (Original work published in 1970).

Murris, Karin Saskia. (2008). Philosophy with Children, the Stingray and the Educative Value of Disequilibrium. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(3–4), 667–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00640.x.

Panizza, Silvia Caprioglio. (2022a). Attention. In Silvia Caprioglio Panizza & Mark Hopwood (Eds.), The Murdochian Mind, (p. 156–68). Routledge Philosophical Minds. London: Routledge.

Panizza, Silvia Caprioglio. (2022b). The Ethics of Attention: Engaging the Real with Iris Murdoch and Simone Weil. London: Taylor & Francis.

Sharp, Ann M. (1987). What Is a ‘Community of Inquiry’?, Journal of Moral Education, 16(1), 37–45.

Sharp, Ann Margaret. (1996). Self-Transformation in the Community of Inquiry. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 16(1), 36–47.

Sharp, Ann Margaret. (1997). The Aesthetic Dimension of the Community of Inquiry. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 17(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews199717122.

Sharp, Ann Margaret. (2004). The Other Dimension of Caring Thinking. C&CT, 12(1), 9–15.

Sharp, Ann Margaret. (2007). The Classroom Community of Inquiry as Ritual. Critical and Creative Thinking, 15(1), 3–14.

Splitter, Laurance J., & Sharp, Ann M. (1995). Teaching for Better Thinking: The Classroom Community of Inquiry. Australian Council for Educational Research, Ltd.

Stanley, Sara, & Lyle, Sue. (2016). Philosophical Play in the Early Years Classroom. In Maughn Rollins Gregory, Karin Murris, and Joanna Haynes (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children (p. 53–62). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726625-18.

Thomas, Christopher. (2020). Simone Weil: The Ethics of Affliction and the Aesthetics of Attention. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 28(2), 145–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2020.1736127.

Watzl, Sebastian. (2023). What Attention Is. The Priority Structure Account. WIREs Cognitive Science, 14(1). e1632. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1632.

Weber, Barbara, & Wolf, Arthur. (2016). Questioning the Question: A Hermeneutical Perspective on the ‘Art of Questioning’ in a Community of Philosophical Inquiry. In Maughn Rollins Gregory, Karin Murris, and Joanna Haynes (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children (74–82). London: Routledge.

Weil, Simone. (1999). Draft for a Statement of Human Obligations. In Siân Miles (Ed.), Simone Weil : An Anthology,(p. 221–30). Modern Classics. London: Penguin.

Weil, Simone. (2002). Gravity and Grace. 1st edition. London ; New York: Routledge.

Weil, Simone. (2009a). Forms of the Implicit Love of God. In Waiting for God (translated by Craufurd Emma, p. 137–215). Perennial Modern Classics. London ; New York: Harper and Row.

Weil, Simone. (2009b). Reflections on the Right Use of School Studies with a View to the Love of God. In Waiting for God (Translated by Crauford Emma). London ; New York: Harper and Row.

Weil, Simone. (2014). Letter to a Priest (Translated by A F Willis). London: Routledge.

White, Boyd. (1998). Aesthetigrams: Mapping Aesthetic Experiences. Studies in Art Education, 39(4), 321–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.1998.11650035.

Yoon, Haeny S., & Templeton, Tran Nguyen. (2019). The Practice of Listening to Children: The Challenges of Hearing Children Out in an Adult-Regulated World. Harvard Educational Review, 89(1), 55-84, 173.

Zaretsky, Robert. (2023). The Subversive Simone Weil: A Life in Five Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Publicado

2023-08-30

Como Citar

ELVIS, Lucy. atentividade, qualidades da escuta e o ouvinte na comunidade de investigação filosófica. childhood & philosophy, Rio de Janeiro, v. 19, p. 01–22, 2023. DOI: 10.12957/childphilo.2023.76451. Disponível em: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/childhood/article/view/76451. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2025.

Edição

Seção

dossier: o presente e o futuro de fazer filosofia com crianças