ensino de pensamento crítico e habilidades meta-cognitivas através da investigação filosófica. relatório de um praticante sobre experimentos em sala de aula.

Autores

  • emma worley The Philosophy Foundation King's College London SOPHIA
  • peter worley The Philosophy Foundation King's College London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2019.46229

Palavras-chave:

pensamento crítico, meta-cognição, investigação filosófica.

Resumo

Embora o consenso de especialistas afirme que o pensamento crítico (PC) é essencial para a investigação, isso não significa necessariamente que, praticando a investigação, as crianças estejam desenvolvendo habilidades de PC. Os programas de filosofia com crianças em todo o mundo visam desenvolver disposições e habilidades de PC por meio de uma comunidade de investigação, e este estudo comparou o impacto do ensino explícito de habilidades de PC durante uma pesquisa, apenas com o método de investigação filosófica (IF) da The Philosophy Foundation (PhF) (que não possuía ensino explícito de habilidades de PC). Diz-se também que a filosofia com crianças melhora as habilidades meta-cognitivas (MC), mas há pouca pesquisa sobre essa afirmação. Após problemas observáveis para garantir uma meta-cognição genuína nas sessões de IF - com uma compreensão razoavelmente forte do que é meta-cognição - um método foi desenvolvido e testado neste estudo para reunir, em apoio mútuo, o desenvolvimento do pensamento crítico e das habilidades meta-cognitivas. Com base no trabalho de Peter Worley e Ellen Fridland (KCL), a Philosophy Foundation realizou um estudo experimental com o King's College London no outono de 2017 e outono de 2018 para comparar o impacto do ensino de habilidades de PC e habilidades de MC em relação às classes que apenas têm investigação filosófica. A abordagem desenvolvida e usada para o estudo emprega o ensino explícito de algumas habilidades de PC e MC no contexto de uma investigação filosófica (em oposição ao ensino separado dessas habilidades) e produz algumas descobertas positivas, tanto qualitativas quanto quantitativas. Ambos os estudos foram realizados em um período de 12 semanas e um grupo de controle e intervenção foi usado em cada estudo. Este relatório se concentra no segundo ano do estudo, com 220 crianças de dez e onze anos envolvidas em oito turmas em três escolas estaduais no sudeste de Londres. Embora existam limitações do estudo, os resultados indicam que o ensino explícito dessas habilidades durante uma investigação filosófica pode ajudar as crianças a usar as habilidades de PC e MC com mais êxito do que apenas a investigação filosófica.

Biografia do Autor

emma worley, The Philosophy Foundation King's College London SOPHIA

Co-CEO and co-founder The Philosophy Foundation, President of SOPHIA, the European Foundation for the Advancement of Philosophy with Children. Visiting Research Associate King's College London.

peter worley, The Philosophy Foundation King's College London

Co-CEO and co-founder The Philosophy Foundation, author with Bloomsbury Education, Crown House Publishing and Roman & Littlefield. Visiting Research Associate King's College London.

Referências

Ackerman, Phillip L. 1987. Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of the psychometric and information processing perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 102, pp. 3-27.

Alexander, Joyce M.; Carr, Martha; & Schwanenflugel, Paula J. 1995. Development of metacognition in gifted children: Directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15, pp. 1-37.

Alvarez Ortiz, Claudia M. 2007. Does Philosophy Improve Critical Thinking Skills? https://www.reasoninglab.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Alvarez-Final_Version.pdf.

Education Endowment Foundation (EEF), Teaching and Learning Toolkit. Available from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evidence-summaries/teaching-learning-toolkit/

Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) Meta-cognition and self-regulation. Available from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/resources/teaching-learningtoolkit/meta-cognition-and-self-regulation/.

Ericsson, K. Anders; Krampe, Ralf Th.; & Tesch-Romer, Clemens. 1993. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, pp. 363-406.

Facione, Peter. 1989. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED315423.pdf.

Fisher, Robert. 2007. Dialogic teaching: developing thinking and metacognition through philosophical discussion. Early Child Development and Care, 177:6-7, 615-631.

Fridland, Ellen; & Moore, Richard. 2014. Imitation reconsidered. Philosophical Psychology, 28(6), 856-880.

García-Moriyón, Felix; Rebollo, Irene; Colom, Roberto. 2005. Evaluating Philosophy for Children: A Meta-Analysis https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Felix_Garcia_Moriyon/publication/290944083_Evaluating_Philosophy_for_Children/links/586aacdd08aebf17d3a4b54b/Evaluating-Philosophy-for-Children.pdf.

Botella, Juan; Centeno-Gutiérrez, Diana; García, Felix; and González Lamas, Jara. 2018. Does Philosophy for Children make a difference? Family Resemblances: Current Trends in Philosophy for Children (Ed.s Duthie, Garcia Moriyon, Robles Loro). http://my.icpic.org/news.html#!/posts/New-book-Family-Resemblances/22.

Gardner, Susan. 1995. Inquiry is no mere conversation. Critical and Creative Thinking, 3 (2), 38-49.

Garlikov, Rick. 2002. Reasoning: What it is to be rational: Available: http://www.akat.com/reasoning.htm.

Gasparatou, Renia. 2016. Philosophy for / with Children and the Development of Epistemically Virtuous Agents. The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children, 12, 103-110, ed Gregory M. R., Haynes, J. Murris, K. Taylor & Francis.

Gregory, Maughn. 2008. Facilitating Classroom Dialogue. Teaching Philosophy, Vol, 30, No. 1 pp. 59-84.

Gorard, Stephen; Siddiqui, Nadia; & Huat See, Beng. 2015. Philosophy for Children Evaluation Report and Executive Summary for Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Projects/Evaluation_Reports/EEF_Project_Report_PhilosophyForChildren.pdf.

Haynes, Joanna and Murris, Karin. 2011. Picturebooks, Pedagogy and Philosophy. Routledge Research in Education.

Murris, Karin. 2008. Philosophy with Children, the Stingray and the Educative Value of Disequilibrium. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42(3-4), 667-685.

Murris Karin. 1992. Teaching Philosophy with Picture Books (out of print).

Murris, Karin and Haynes, Joanna. 2002. Storywise: thinking through stories. Dialogue Works.

Oyler, Joseph. 2015. Expert Teacher Contributions to Argumentation During Inquiry Dialogue, Theses, Dissertations and Culminating Projects, https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/etd/78.

Palinscar, Annemarie Sullivan; & Brown, Ann L. 1984. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), pp. 117-175.

Paris, Scott G.; Cross, David R.; & Lipson, Marjorie Y. 1984. Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children’s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, pp. 1239-1252.

Schraw, Gregory. 1998. Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1/2) (Special issue: Metacognition in teaching and learning), pp. 113-125.

Swain, Jon; Cara, Olga; Litster, Jenny. 2014. An evaluation report: Doing Philosophy in Schools (unpublished). Summary: https://www.philosophy-foundation.org/validation-research.

Trageskes, Mark R.; & Daines, Delva. 1989. Effects of metacognitive strategies on reading comprehension. Reading Research and Instruction, 29(1), pp. 52-60.

Williams, Steve. 2016. A brief history of p4c, especially in the UK https://p4c.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/History-of-P4C.pdf.

Worley, Peter. 2012. The If Odyssey, Bloomsbury Education.

Worley, Peter. 2015a. 40 Lessons to Get Children Thinking, Bloomsbury Education.

Worley, Peter. 2015b. If it, anchor it, open it up. A closed guided questioning technique. The Socratic Handbook Dialogue Methods for Philosophical Practice (Ed. Michael Noah Weidd).

Worley, Peter. 2016. Intellectual Virtues of Doing Philosophy. Unpublished. https://www.academia.edu/33533846/Intellectual_virtues_of_doing_philosophy

Worley, Peter. 2018a. Plato, metacognition and philosophy in schools. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 5(1). https://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/jps/article/view/1486

Worley, Peter. 2018b. Dissonance: Disagreement and Critical Thinking in P4/wC. Family Resemblances: Current Trends in Philosophy for Children (Ed.s Duthie, Garcia Moriyon, Robles Loro), 178–187. http://congresos.fuam.es/imagenes/descargas_archivos/Res%C3%BAmenes%20Abstracts%20XVIII%20ICPIC%20%20Conference%202_96.pdf

Worley, Peter. 2011 & 2019. The If Machine, 2nd Edition: 30 Lesson Plans for Teaching Philosophy, Bloomsbury Education.

Worley, Peter. 2020. PhiE: A Facilitator's Guide to Philosophical Enquiry in Schools, Roman & Littlefield, forthcoming.

Downloads

Publicado

2019-12-30

Como Citar

worley, emma, & worley, peter. (2019). ensino de pensamento crítico e habilidades meta-cognitivas através da investigação filosófica. relatório de um praticante sobre experimentos em sala de aula. Childhood & Philosophy, 15, 01–34. https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2019.46229

Edição

Seção

artigos