the trajectories of pedagogical philosophizing in finland:
overcoming the institutional boundaries between education and philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2025.89503Keywords:
finland, pedagogical philosophizing (PePhi), p4/wC, classroom teaching, subject teaching, deweyAbstract
The first purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the history of the Finnish field of philosophizing with children, describing how these ideas have crossed borders into Finland through various routes and at different times. Furthermore, I offer a synoptic view of the current situation in Finland. Secondly, I will examine the division within the Finnish school system between classroom teaching in primary school and subject teaching in secondary school. This dividing line has hindered the recognition of the potential for pedagogical philosophizing with children and young people in schools. This distinction is evident in that classroom teachers feel uncertain about their philosophical competence, while subject teachers with strong disciplinary training in philosophy feel inadequate in their educational and dialogical interaction skills. Thirdly, inspired by John Dewey, I justify why this boundary between education and philosophy, so to speak, should be understood as artificial. From a Deweyan perspective I also argue that pedagogical philosophizing can be considered a key practice in the so-called pedagogical reconstruction of philosophy, whether in class teaching or subject teaching. Finally, I conclude with suggestions on how the community of philosophical inquiry approach would improve academic (teacher) education and benefit both the basic competencies of teachers and their capacities to practice pedagogical philosophizing in schools.
Downloads
References
Bialystok, L. (2017). Philosophy across the curriculum and the question of teacher capacity; Or, what is philosophy and who can teach it? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(4), 817–836.
Biswas, T., & Rollo, T. (2024). Confronting adultcentrism: Childist and decolonial interventions in educational philosophies and institutions. childhood & philosophy, 20, 1–11.
Burgh, G. (2014). Democratic pedagogy. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 1(1), 22–44.
Cosentino, A. (2020). The philosophical baby and Socratic orality. childhood & philosophy, 16, 1–16.
Dewey, J. (1902). The Child and the Curriculum (Vol. 2., J. A. Boydston, Ed.). Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education (Vol. 9., J. A. Boydston, Ed.). Southern Illinois University Press.
Errs, M. (2018). ‘Complete freedom to choose within limits’ – teachers’ views of curricular autonomy, agency and control in Estonia, Finland and Germany. The Curriculum Journal, 29(2), 238–256.
FNAE (Finnish National Agency for Education) (2019). The National Core Curriculum for General Upper Secondary Education 2019. https://www.oph.fi/en/education-system/general-upper-secondary-education. Open access pdf-version of the updated document: https://eperusteet.opintopolku.fi/#/en/lukiokoulutus/6828810/tiedot
FNAE (Finnish National Agency for Education) (2022). Finnish Education in a Nutshell. https://www.oph.fi/en/statistics-and-publications/publications/finnish-education-nutshell
García Moriyón, F., & Lardner, T. (2024). The philosophical and theoretical background of an educator working with P4C: How much philosophy? Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 44(2), 44–59.
Gregory, M. (2002). Are philosophy and children good for each other? Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 16(2).
Gregory, M. (2010). Filosofiaa lapsille & nuorille. Käytännön käsikirja (J. S. Tuusvuori, Trans.). niin & näin/EFS. (Original work published 2008)
Haynes, J., & Murris, K. (2011). The provocation of an epistemological shift in teacher education through philosophy with children. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(2), 285–303.
Honkala, S. (1999). Niin on monta hämmentäjää kuin sopassa lusikkaakin. In O. Arra & S. Honkala (Eds.), Sofiopolis. Satoa ja sattumuksia helsinkiläisten koulujen filosofian tunneilta (pp. 23–29). The School Agency of the City of Helsinki.
Juuso, H. (1994). Lapset, filosofia ja tutkiva yhteisö. Matthew Lipmanin haastattelu. [Children, philosophy, and community of inquiry. Interview of Matthew Lipman] Kasvatus, v. 25, n. 3, p. 287–293.
Juuso, H. (1995). Ajattelu kasvatuksessa. Matthew Lipmanin Filosofiaa lapsille -ohjelman pääpiirteet. In J. Kotkavirta (Ed.), Filosofia koulunpenkillä (pp. 48–69). Painatuskeskus.
Juuso, H. (2007a). Child, Philosophy and Education. Discussing the Intellectual Sources of Philosophy for Children. Oulu University Press. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:9789514285509
Juuso, H. (2007b). Lapsi, filosofia ja kasvatus. niin & näin, 14(4), 71–74.
Juuso, H., & Tomperi, T. (2010a). Lasten filosofointi syventäisi kouluopetusta. Helsingin Sanomat, a2. http://www.hs.fi/paakirjoitus/artikkeli/Lasten+filosofointi+syvent%C3%A4isi+kouluopetusta/HS20100318SI1MA01ft1
Juuso, H., & Tomperi, T. (2010b). Nimekkäät asiantuntijat puoltavat filosofiaa peruskouluun. Press release 12.4.2010. https://filoaloite.wordpress.com/mediatiedote/
Juuso, H., & Tomperi, T. (2010c). Lasten ja nuorten filosofiaa peruskouluun? [Philosophy for children and young people in the comprehensive school?] niin & näin, 17(2), 19.
Kizel, A. (2019). Following philosophy with children concepts in practice of teacher education. childhood & philosophy, 15, 1–21.
Kohan, W., & Carvalho, M. (2019). Finding treasures: Is the community of philosophical inquiry a methodology? Studies in Philosophy and Education, 38, 275–289.
Liebel, M. & Miede, P. (2024). Can school become a non-adultist institution? childhood & philosophy, 20, 1–34.
Lipman, M. (2001). Dramatizing Philosophy. Critical and Creative Thinking, 9(2), 10–15.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press.
Lipman, M. (2014). The educational role of philosophy. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 1(1), 5–14. (Original work published 1993)
Lipman, M., Sharp, A. M., & Oscanyan, F. (1980). Philosophy in the Classroom (2nd ed). Temple University Press.
Martens, E. (1983). Einführung in die Didaktik der Philosophie. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Michalik, K. (2019). Teacher and learner perspectives on philosophical discussion – Uncertainty as a challenge and opportunity. childhood & philosophy, 15, 1–20.
Mikkola, E., Perälä, M., Hotulainen, R., Salmenkivi, E., & Kallioniemi, A. (2024). Causal variables in the community of inquiry: Creating a directed acyclic graph of the effectiveness of the Philosophy for Children program. International Journal of Educational Research, 127, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102414
Morehouse, R. (1988). Filosofiaa lapsille. Kasvatus, 19(4), 253–263.
Olkinuora, E. (1988). Oppiminen, opetus ja kognitiivinen psykologia. Kasvatus, 19(1), 249–252.
Perälä, M., & Salmenkivi, E. (2020a). Filosofian ylioppilaskokeen kehityslinjoja 2015–2019. niin & näin, 27(1), 91–93.
Perälä, M., & Salmenkivi, E. (2020b). Käskysanat ja ajattelun taidot filosofian ylioppilaskokeessa. niin & näin, 27(3), 120–123.
Perälä, M., & Salmenkivi, E. (2022). Students’ performance in ethics assignments in the Finnish Matriculation Examination 2017–2021. Nordidactica. Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, 12(2), 14–43.
Perälä, M., & Salmenkivi, E. (2024). The teaching of logic in Finnish school philosophy: A historical perspective. In E. Kaila, I. Niiniluoto, & S. Pihlström (Eds.), Perspectives on the History of Philosophy in Finland: Proceedings of the 150th Anniversary Conference of the Philosophical Society of Finland (Vol. 101, pp. 433-451). Article 23 (Acta Philosophica Fennica; No. 101). Suomen filosofinen yhdistys.
Pulliainen, U. (2015). Lukiofilosofian tulevaisuus. Ukkologiasta ajattelun taitoihin. niin & näin, 22(1), 135–136.
Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish Lessons 2.0. What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? 2nd ed. Teachers College Press.
Salmenkivi, E. (2013). Ylioppilastutkinnon filosofian ainereaalikoe ja lukion opetussuunnitelman perusteet. niin & näin, 20(1), 100–112. https://netn.fi/artikkelit/ylioppilastutkinnon-filosofian-ainereaalikoe-ja-lukion-opetussuunnitelman-perusteet/
Salmenkivi, E. (2016). Lukiofilosofian suosio kääntyi nousuun. niin & näin, 23(3), 106–108.
Saranpää, M., & Juuso, H. (1995). Keskustelu Matthew Lipmanin kanssa. niin & näin, 2(4), 60–61.
Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41(4), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060500317810
Tomperi, T. (2007). UNESCO ulkoakateemisesta filosofiasta. niin & näin, 14(4), 64–65.
Tomperi, T. (2008). Kasvatus, pedagoginen filosofia ja filosofianopetus. In T. Tomperi & H. Juuso (Eds.), Sokrates koulussa. Itsenäisen ja yhteisöllisen ajattelun edistäminen opetuksessa (pp. 9–27). EFS/niin & näin.
Tomperi, T. (2016). Lukiofilosofia, pedagoginen filosofointi ja aineenopettajan ammattitaito. niin & näin, 23(1), 82–101. https://netn.fi/artikkelit/lukiofilosofia-pedagoginen-filosofointi-ja-aineenopettajan-ammattitaito/
Tomperi, T. (2017). Filosofianopetus ja pedagoginen filosofia: filosofia oppiaineena ja kasvatuksena. EFS/niin & näin. https://netn.fi/syn_publication/filosofianopetus/
Tomperi, T. (2024). The long history of philosophy as a school subject in Finland: continuities and controversies. In E. Kaila, I. Niiniluoto, & S. Pihlström (Eds.), Perspectives on the History of Philosophy in Finland (Vol. 101, pp. 411–432). Acta Philosophica Fennica. https://tuukkatomperi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Tomperi_The-Long-History-of-Philosophy-as-a-School-Subject-in-Finland_2024_Acta-101.pdf
Tomperi, T., & Juuso, H. (Eds.). (2008). Sokrates koulussa. Itsenäisen ja yhteisöllisen ajattelun edistäminen opetuksessa. EFS/niin & näin.
Tomperi, T., & Juuso, H. (2014). (Lasten) pedagoginen filosofia. Kasvatuksen historiallinen mahdollisuus. niin & näin, 21(1), 95–105. https://netn.fi/artikkelit/lasten-pedagoginen-filosofia-kasvatuksen-historiallinen-mahdollisuus/
Tomperi, T., & Veijola, A. (2023). Reflektiivisyys ja ajattelun ajatteleminen lukiofilosofiassa. Metakognitiivisen mallin ainedidaktinen kokeilu. Kasvatus & Aika, 17(1), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.33350/ka.119959
Tuusvuori, J. S. (2010). Filosofiaa perusopetukseen – kaikuja keskusteluista. niin & näin, 17(2), 30–32.
UNESCO (2007). Philosophy – a School of Freedom. Teaching philosophy and learning to philosophize: Status and prospects. UNESCO Publishing. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001541/154173e.pdf
Vansieleghem, N., & Kennedy, D. (2011). That is philosophy for children, what is philosophy with children – After Matthew Lipman? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(2), 171–182.
Varricchio, I., & Tomperi, T. (2025). History of philosophy in Nordic upper secondary school curricula: How to relate the past with the present? Journal of Didactics of Philosophy (forthcoming, accepted).
Veijola, A., & Tomperi, T. (2024). Mitä aika on? Podcastit lukiolaisten kriittisen ajattelun kuvaajina. Ainedidaktiikka, 8(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.23988/ad.144803
Välitalo, R. (2018). The Philosophical Classroom: Balancing Educational Purposes. University of Oulu Press. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:9789526219936
Välitalo, R., Juuso, H., & Sutinen, A. (2016). Philosophy for children as an educational practice. Studies in Philosophy of Education, 35, 79–92.
Wang, J. C.-S. (2016). From learning outcomes to educational possibilities – What happens when philosophical community inquiry “works wonders” with university students in Taiwan. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 36(1), 26–42.
