THE ARGUMENT OF FALSENESS AND THE INCEDENTAL DECLARATORY ACTION IN THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/rfd.2024.81623

Keywords:

Ancillary declaratory action, Falsehood claim, Documentary falsehood, Documentary fraud claim, Prejudicial issue

Abstract

The regime for the incidente of falsehood is analyzed, which can be initiated after the production of documentar evidence. Depending on how it is used during the process, the allegation of falsehood may be a mere incidente or na incidental declaratory action. As an incidental declaratoru action, the possibilidty of its appropriateness is examined, considering that Law nº13.105, of March 16th, 2015, the current Code of Civil Procedure, no longer expressly provides for it, as did the Code of Civil Procedure of 1973, Law nº 5.869, of January 11th, 197, in its article 325, which established: “if the defendant contest the right that constitutes the basis of the request the plaintif may request, within 10 (tem) days, that the judge will issue a ruling on it, if the declaration of the existence or non-existence of the righ depends, in whole or in part, on the judgement of the case” (art.5). To this end, it will be necessary to examine the notion of a prejudicial questioon, as well as the concept and purpose of the incidental declaratory action.

Keywords: Ancillary declaratory action; Falsehood claim; Documentary falsehood; Documentary fraud claim; Prejudicial issue.

Author Biography

Álvaro Antônio Sagulo Borges de Aquino, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Defensor Público do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Professor Adjunto de Teoria Geral do Processo e de Direito Processual Civil da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ

Downloads

Published

2024-02-15

How to Cite

Antônio Sagulo Borges de Aquino, Álvaro. (2024). THE ARGUMENT OF FALSENESS AND THE INCEDENTAL DECLARATORY ACTION IN THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Revista Da Faculdade De Direito Da UERJ, (43), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.12957/rfd.2024.81623

Issue

No. 43 (2024): Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ - RFD

Section

Artigos

License

Copyright

 

oArticles published in the Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ (RFD/UERJ)

The copyrights of the published articles belong to the Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ (RFD/UERJ). Total or partial reproduction of the articles is allowed as long as the source is cited. 

 

oPartial reproduction from other publications

Submitted papers that contain parts of text extracted from other publications must obey the specified limits to ensure originality of the submitted work. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical behavior and is unacceptable.

It is recommended to avoid reproduction of tables and illustrations from other publications. The article that contains reproduction of one or more tables and/or illustrations from other publications will only be sent for analysis if it is accompanied by written permission from the copyright holder of the original work for the specified reproduction in the Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ (RFD/UERJ). The permission must be addressed to the author of the submitted work. Under no circumstances will the Journal of the Law School of the State University of Rio de Janeiro (RFD/UERJ) and the authors of the papers published in this journal transfer the rights thus obtained.

 

•The refused studies will be returned to the authors, if asked.

 

 

Licença Creative Commons
 The Revista da Faculdade de Direito is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution-No Derivation License.

This license allows copying and redistribution of the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial, provided that the original authorship is acknowledged.