ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE AUTOMATION OF LEGAL DECISION
BETWEEN EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS PROCESS-DECISION-MAKING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/rfd.2024.72632Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Procedural Law, Legal Decision, Neoliberal proceduralism, Democratic-constitutional proceduralismAbstract
The digital era led countless aspects of life in society to revolutionary technologies, above all, by Artificial Intelligence mechanisms. In this logic, the jurisdiction also assumes the inevitable position of adapting to social aspirations, from the review of judicial protection, now under this new technological perspective of life acceleration. This research aims to examine the fundamentals and particularities about the Artificial Intelligence functioning mechanisms, especially those that interest the procedural legal field and the possible impacts, positive and negative, in the jurisdiction. Thereby, the study sought to solve the following research problem: can automated decision-making in the jurisdictional process represent the consolidation of an excessively logical and rational view of jurisdiction, causing offense to the democratic-constitutional perspective of the process? Can it also denote the commitment of the effectiveness of judicial protection? For this purpose, a dialectical approach was used, aiming at a dynamic interpretation of the determining conditions and results inherent to the phenomenon of insertion of AI in the legal context, since, in a certain way, they present paradoxical characteristics. Regarding the procedural method, the historical-comparative method was adopted to enter the paradigmatic bases and the historical-political events that influenced the dilapidation of the Brazilian judicial process, to later correlate them with biases that support the justification of the implementing smart technologies in the jurisdiction today. Finally, it was intended to story the ways to align the use of AI to the foundations of a democratic-constitutional proceduralism, with effectively meets the protection of its subjects of law.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence. Procedural Law. Legal Decision. Neoliberal proceduralism. Democratic-constitutional proceduralism.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
oArticles published in the Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ (RFD/UERJ)
The copyrights of the published articles belong to the Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ (RFD/UERJ). Total or partial reproduction of the articles is allowed as long as the source is cited.
oPartial reproduction from other publications
Submitted papers that contain parts of text extracted from other publications must obey the specified limits to ensure originality of the submitted work. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical behavior and is unacceptable.
It is recommended to avoid reproduction of tables and illustrations from other publications. The article that contains reproduction of one or more tables and/or illustrations from other publications will only be sent for analysis if it is accompanied by written permission from the copyright holder of the original work for the specified reproduction in the Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ (RFD/UERJ). The permission must be addressed to the author of the submitted work. Under no circumstances will the Journal of the Law School of the State University of Rio de Janeiro (RFD/UERJ) and the authors of the papers published in this journal transfer the rights thus obtained.
•The refused studies will be returned to the authors, if asked.
The Revista da Faculdade de Direito is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution-No Derivation License.
This license allows copying and redistribution of the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial, provided that the original authorship is acknowledged.