PUBLIC POLICIES AND RIGHT TO HEALTH:
EVOLUTION OF GOVERNMENT SPENDING AND EFFECTIVENESS OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/rfd.2024.61814Keywords:
Public policies, Right to health, Lowi, Typology of Theodore, Public budget, fundamental rightsAbstract
This paper proposes a study to demonstrate the actual scope of the effectiveness of public policies related to the right to health. In this line, based on Theodore J. Lowi's typology of policies, treating health policies as redistributive, the main hypothesis is to establish a relationship or not between the alternations in political areas and arenas of power in recent years with the level of effectiveness of these policies. To this end, in addition to the in-depth analysis of the concrete levels of effectiveness of social welfare rights, with a focus on health, public policies should be observed through an interdisciplinary prism. Thus, the consideration of elements of financial and budgetary law are essential in the course of the work. The main object revolves around proving the hypothesis, also resorting to a Federal Government budget analysis of health spending from 2010-2019. The method used for this is the hypothetical-deductive one, added to the programmatic constitutional norms, the entire legal discipline of health, the qualified bibliography and the articles relevant to the theme. Finally, the relevance of the article consists in the verification of the low level of effectiveness that the most vulnerable social classes benefit from this redistributive policy. At the moment of the Covid-19 pandemic, with record deaths and the collapse of the health system, the discussion about the importance of scientific research and the right to health as a whole is even more fundamental.
Keywords: Public policies. Right to health. Fundamental rights. Public budget. Typology of Theodore. Lowi.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
oArticles published in the Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ (RFD/UERJ)
The copyrights of the published articles belong to the Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ (RFD/UERJ). Total or partial reproduction of the articles is allowed as long as the source is cited.
oPartial reproduction from other publications
Submitted papers that contain parts of text extracted from other publications must obey the specified limits to ensure originality of the submitted work. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical behavior and is unacceptable.
It is recommended to avoid reproduction of tables and illustrations from other publications. The article that contains reproduction of one or more tables and/or illustrations from other publications will only be sent for analysis if it is accompanied by written permission from the copyright holder of the original work for the specified reproduction in the Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ (RFD/UERJ). The permission must be addressed to the author of the submitted work. Under no circumstances will the Journal of the Law School of the State University of Rio de Janeiro (RFD/UERJ) and the authors of the papers published in this journal transfer the rights thus obtained.
•The refused studies will be returned to the authors, if asked.
The Revista da Faculdade de Direito is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution-No Derivation License.
This license allows copying and redistribution of the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial, provided that the original authorship is acknowledged.