CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORY AND DOSIMETRY OF THE PENALTY
A NECESSARY CRITICAL DISCOURSE TO REDUCE POTESTAS PUNIENDI’S DYSFUNCTIONALITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/rfd.2024.59885Keywords:
Teoria da Pena, Discurso crítico da teoria da pena, Teoria negativa, Teoria materialista/dialética, Poder punitivo,Abstract
The aim of this paper was to evaluate the legal discourses of punishment theories in order to see which of them - or if all of them - are adopted in Brazil and the reason for their adoption. It then set out to demonstrate the misconception of adopting an official theory of punishment. In order to do this, the article looked at the main official theories of punishment and their legal-philosophical foundations, as well as the main theoretical models critical of the official theories. The literature review allows us to present the criticisms of these theories and, later, to present the negative theory and the materialist / dialectic theory. Both aim to reduce the latent dysfunctionalities that the punitive system imposes on those marginalized by the normative punitive power. The treated theme is, therefore, divergent in the doctrine, but it is unison in the jurisprudence, which adopts the official criminological theory and uses the dosimetry of the penalty to legitimize the discourse of the wealthiest social caste to the detriment of those who have negative social factors. As a result, its dysfunctionalities - highly damaging to the rule of law and individual guarantees in the democratic rule of law - create a greater scope of incidence, causing the police state to override the rule of law.
Keywords: Theory of Penalty. Critical discourse on the theory of punishment. Negative theory. Materialist / dialectic theory. Punitive power.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
oArticles published in the Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ (RFD/UERJ)
The copyrights of the published articles belong to the Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ (RFD/UERJ). Total or partial reproduction of the articles is allowed as long as the source is cited.
oPartial reproduction from other publications
Submitted papers that contain parts of text extracted from other publications must obey the specified limits to ensure originality of the submitted work. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical behavior and is unacceptable.
It is recommended to avoid reproduction of tables and illustrations from other publications. The article that contains reproduction of one or more tables and/or illustrations from other publications will only be sent for analysis if it is accompanied by written permission from the copyright holder of the original work for the specified reproduction in the Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UERJ (RFD/UERJ). The permission must be addressed to the author of the submitted work. Under no circumstances will the Journal of the Law School of the State University of Rio de Janeiro (RFD/UERJ) and the authors of the papers published in this journal transfer the rights thus obtained.
•The refused studies will be returned to the authors, if asked.
The Revista da Faculdade de Direito is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution-No Derivation License.
This license allows copying and redistribution of the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial, provided that the original authorship is acknowledged.