O esvaziamento do texto e o controle das decisões jurídicas / The emptying of the text and the control of legal decisions
Keywords:
Significante e significado, Ceticismo pirrônico, Indicadores e predicadores/ Signifier and meaning, Pyrrhonic skepticism, Indicators and predicators.Abstract
DOI: 10.1590/2179-8966/2020/47097
Resumo
O artigo pretende investigar por que os textos da lei não estão aptos a controlar o discurso jurídico. Para isso situa o problema na filosofia retórica da linguagem e estuda a incompatibilidade entre discursos gerais e eventos individuais. Como a lei não consegue garantir o acordo hermenêutico, o artigo sugere a tese de que os significados de textos e eventos são institucionalizados por meio de procedimentos.
Palavras-chave: Significante e significado; Ceticismo pirrônico; Indicadores e predicadores.
Abstract
The article aims to investigate why law texts are not able to control legal discourses. To this end, it situates the problem in the rhetorical philosophy of language and studies the incompatibility between general discourses and individual events. As legal texts cannot guarantee hermeneutical agreement, the article suggests the thesis that the meanings of texts and events are institutionalized through procedures.
Keywords: Signifier and meaning; Pyrrhonic skepticism; Indicators and predicators.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors the sole responsibility for their texts.
It is allowed the total or partial reproduction of the articles of the Journal Law and Praxis, if the author is mentioned.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial, provided the original authorship is cited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.