As disputas pela interpretação constitucional do plano diretor / Disputes over the constitutional interpretation of the master plan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/dep.2016.22950Keywords:
Plano diretor, Política urbana, Supremo Tribunal Federal / Master plan, Urban policy, Supreme Court.Abstract
DOI: 10.12957/dep.2016.22950
Resumo
O artigo reconstrói as disputas interpretativas em torno do sentido do plano diretor. É mapeada a argumentação dos magistrados e demais atores políticos envolvidos no Recurso Extraordinário n. 607.940/DF, em que foi questionada no Supremo Tribunal Federal a constitucionalidade da Lei Complementar n. 710/2005 editada pela Câmara Legislativa do Distrito Federal.
Palavras-chave: Plano diretor; Política urbana; Supremo Tribunal Federal.
Abstract
The article reconstructs the interpretation disputes concerning what the master plan means. It maps the reasons given by judges and other political actors that took part in the Constitutional Appeal n. 607.940/DF, in which it was questioned at the Supreme Court the constitutionality of the Law n. 710/2005 passed by the Legislative Chamber of the Federal District.
Keywords: Master plan; Urban policy; Supreme Court.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors the sole responsibility for their texts.
It is allowed the total or partial reproduction of the articles of the Journal Law and Praxis, if the author is mentioned.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License.
This license allows you to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercial, provided the original authorship is cited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.