Experience Report on Antagonistic Relations between Psychology and Law in Prison

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/epp.2024.83983

Keywords:

psychology, prisons, experience report, critical, criminal law

Abstract

This article aims to reflect on the often-antagonistic relationship between psychological science and the Law, especially in prisons. It argues that the interface between Psychology and the Law is fundamental, including as a possibility of overcoming the antagonisms that, in their simple reproduction, undermine the possibilities for the development of both sciences. It also reflects on the fact that, since science and its practices are not neutral, they are either at the service of transforming society, leading it to indicators of health, well-being and overcoming inequalities, or at the service of maintaining the injustices that affect it, especially in Brazil, which is home to many of these injustices. Based on the authors' professional or academic experience in prison, the aim is to reflect on the challenges inherent in building a psychology that promotes the universal rights of humanity, including from behind bars; at the same time, that is committed to overcoming inequalities and creating a just society, based on the fundamental ethical principles of the profession.

Published

2024-12-18

How to Cite

Lourenço, A. da S., Ramos, E. T. de, & Massola, G. M. (2024). Experience Report on Antagonistic Relations between Psychology and Law in Prison. Studies and Research in Psychology, 24. https://doi.org/10.12957/epp.2024.83983

Issue

Section

Dossier Psi Practices in spaces of deprivation and restriction of freedom