Experience Report on Antagonistic Relations between Psychology and Law in Prison
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/epp.2024.83983Keywords:
psychology, prisons, experience report, critical, criminal lawAbstract
This article aims to reflect on the often-antagonistic relationship between psychological science and the Law, especially in prisons. It argues that the interface between Psychology and the Law is fundamental, including as a possibility of overcoming the antagonisms that, in their simple reproduction, undermine the possibilities for the development of both sciences. It also reflects on the fact that, since science and its practices are not neutral, they are either at the service of transforming society, leading it to indicators of health, well-being and overcoming inequalities, or at the service of maintaining the injustices that affect it, especially in Brazil, which is home to many of these injustices. Based on the authors' professional or academic experience in prison, the aim is to reflect on the challenges inherent in building a psychology that promotes the universal rights of humanity, including from behind bars; at the same time, that is committed to overcoming inequalities and creating a just society, based on the fundamental ethical principles of the profession.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT:
Studies and Research in Psychology automatically holds the copyright deriving from the publication of the works. The full or partial reproduction of each text (over 500 words of the original text) must be requested in writing to the Editor.
Studies and Research in Psychology Journal is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license might be available at http://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/ revispsi/.