O TRÂNSITO DE TÉCNICAS DOS PROCESSOS DE RECUPERAÇÃO JUDICIAL PARA A EXECUÇÃO A PARTIR DA NEGOCIAÇÃO PROCESSUAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2025.88853Abstract
The Brazilian procedural legal system, governed especially by the Code of Civil Procedure, provides for the common procedure, applicable, in general, to ordinary actions and in a subsidiary manner to other types of actions, and, in addition, provides for procedures special, also provided for in specific legislation, such as that provided for in the Law on Judicial Reorganization and Bankruptcy of companies. Consequently, the procedural legal system, whether through the CPC or through specific legislation, also regulates common and special procedural techniques, applicable in each of the procedures for which the legislator intended to create the respective technique. It turns out that, given the consensual character brought to civil proceedings by the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, in particular through the express provision on the conclusion of procedural legal transactions, it is currently possible to make procedures more flexible, through the transit of techniques from one procedure to the next. This is because, although the legislator has not foreseen a certain technique for a specific procedure, it may prove to be useful and compatible with the objectives of this procedure. Thus, flexibility through the transfer of procedural techniques originally provided for in the law for specific procedures is a method capable of guaranteeing greater effectiveness in judicial protection. An example of a procedure that can receive procedural techniques is the executive process, on the grounds that this process requires greater effectiveness and speed in favor of the creditor. This article therefore analyzes the conditions for concluding procedural legal transactions aimed at the transfer of procedural techniques from the Judicial Reorganization and Bankruptcy Law to the executive process, and exemplifies techniques provided for in the law and their applicability in the executive process. The analysis demonstrates that the absorption of techniques from the judicial recovery and bankruptcy process can make the creditor's search for satisfaction of his credit more effective.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marcela Kohlbach de Faria, Caroline Christyne Goebel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todos os artigos publicados na Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual (REDP) (Departamento de Direito Processual, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) são licenciados por meio de uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais de seu artigo e concordam em licenciar seu trabalho com a licença CC BY 4.0, aceitando assim os termos e condições específicos desta licença disponíveis no seguinte website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
- Os autores concedem à REDP o direito de primeira publicação, de se identificar como publicadora original do trabalho e concedem à revista uma licença de direitos não exclusivos para utilizar o trabalho das seguintes formas: Reproduzir, vender e distribuir cópias eletrônicas ou impressas do manuscrito como um todo, de partes específicas do manuscrito e de suas traduções para qualquer idioma;
- O uso do artigo por terceiros é livre, contanto que a integridade da publicação seja mantida e seus autores originais, periódico de primeira publicação e detalhes de citação sejam identificados.
Dentro dos termos da licença, os autores podem entrar em acordos contratuais adicionais separados para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada do trabalho na revista.
Copyright and Licensing
All articles published in the Procedural Law Electronic Review (REDP) (Department of Procedural Law, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) are licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors retain copyright to their article and agree to license their work under the CC BY 4.0 license, thereby accepting the specific terms and conditions of this license available at the following website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ legal code.
- Authors grant REDP the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher of the work, and grant the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: Reproduce, sell and distribute electronic or printed copies of the manuscript as a whole, of specific parts of the manuscript and its translations into any language;
- Use of the article by third parties is free, as long as the integrity of the publication is maintained and its original authors, first publication journal, and citation details are identified.
Within the terms of the license, authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in the journal.
