ELEMENTO VINCULANTE DAS DECISÕES DO SUPREMO: ENTRE TESES JURÍDICAS E PRECEDENTES JUDICIAIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2024.86620Abstract
This article analyzes the system of binding to higher decisions of the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code. Despite the effort of the legislator, the establishment of a list of supposedly mandatory decisions (art. 927) and the scope of binding these decision-making standards still give rise to doubts and controversies. In this context, the study proposes to analyze some of the reasons for the reform and the regulation chosen in the code, to expose, from the doctrine and the comparison of decisions of the Federal Supreme Court, that the notion of precedent is qualitative. As a result, it is pointed out the impossibility of seeing the list chosen by the legislator as exhaustive for mandatory decisions, as well as it is concluded that it is possible to distinguish judicial products between legal theses and precedents, with different binding elements, that can occur in any decision of the Supreme Court, both of which can be seen as clarifying formulas of the current law, with mandatory effectiveness in the Judiciary.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jair Marocco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todos os artigos publicados na Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual (REDP) (Departamento de Direito Processual, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) são licenciados por meio de uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais de seu artigo e concordam em licenciar seu trabalho com a licença CC BY 4.0, aceitando assim os termos e condições específicos desta licença disponíveis no seguinte website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
- Os autores concedem à REDP o direito de primeira publicação, de se identificar como publicadora original do trabalho e concedem à revista uma licença de direitos não exclusivos para utilizar o trabalho das seguintes formas: Reproduzir, vender e distribuir cópias eletrônicas ou impressas do manuscrito como um todo, de partes específicas do manuscrito e de suas traduções para qualquer idioma;
- O uso do artigo por terceiros é livre, contanto que a integridade da publicação seja mantida e seus autores originais, periódico de primeira publicação e detalhes de citação sejam identificados.
Dentro dos termos da licença, os autores podem entrar em acordos contratuais adicionais separados para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada do trabalho na revista.
Copyright and Licensing
All articles published in the Procedural Law Electronic Review (REDP) (Department of Procedural Law, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) are licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors retain copyright to their article and agree to license their work under the CC BY 4.0 license, thereby accepting the specific terms and conditions of this license available at the following website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ legal code.
- Authors grant REDP the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher of the work, and grant the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: Reproduce, sell and distribute electronic or printed copies of the manuscript as a whole, of specific parts of the manuscript and its translations into any language;
- Use of the article by third parties is free, as long as the integrity of the publication is maintained and its original authors, first publication journal, and citation details are identified.
Within the terms of the license, authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in the journal.
