A RELEVÂNCIA DA QUESTÃO DE DIREITO FEDERAL NO RECURSO ESPECIAL: FILTRO OBSTATIVO DE CONHECIMENTO OU INSTRUMENTO DE INTEGRAÇÃO DO MICROSSISTEMA DE DEMANDAS REPETITIVAS?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2024.86614Abstract
This essay intends to reflect on the adoption of the relevance of the federal issue, in the terms of the art. 105, III, §§ 2 and 3, on the Federal Constitution/1988, included by Constitutional Amendment 125/2022. As a central point, it discusses the novel institute, if it is an obstinative filter of knowledge or an instrument for integrating the microsystem of repetitive demands, inaugurated by EC 45/2004 and operationalized by the Civil Procedure Code of 2015. Also, as general objectives, intends: a) to analyze, from the theory of precedents (CPC/2015) and the modification brought about by EC 125/2022 in the appeal competence of the Superior Court of Justice, its systemic reconfiguration as Court of Precedent; b) examine whether this new appeal represents a jettisoning the principle of access to justice. From the analysis of the theoretical references, as a way of obtaining the result of the delimited objectives, it is concluded that it can be used both as an obstacle filter (in the case of the irrelevance issue) and as a judgment technique when presents the relevance of the question of federal law.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Fernando Natal Batista
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todos os artigos publicados na Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual (REDP) (Departamento de Direito Processual, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) são licenciados por meio de uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais de seu artigo e concordam em licenciar seu trabalho com a licença CC BY 4.0, aceitando assim os termos e condições específicos desta licença disponíveis no seguinte website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
- Os autores concedem à REDP o direito de primeira publicação, de se identificar como publicadora original do trabalho e concedem à revista uma licença de direitos não exclusivos para utilizar o trabalho das seguintes formas: Reproduzir, vender e distribuir cópias eletrônicas ou impressas do manuscrito como um todo, de partes específicas do manuscrito e de suas traduções para qualquer idioma;
- O uso do artigo por terceiros é livre, contanto que a integridade da publicação seja mantida e seus autores originais, periódico de primeira publicação e detalhes de citação sejam identificados.
Dentro dos termos da licença, os autores podem entrar em acordos contratuais adicionais separados para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada do trabalho na revista.
Copyright and Licensing
All articles published in the Procedural Law Electronic Review (REDP) (Department of Procedural Law, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) are licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors retain copyright to their article and agree to license their work under the CC BY 4.0 license, thereby accepting the specific terms and conditions of this license available at the following website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ legal code.
- Authors grant REDP the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher of the work, and grant the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: Reproduce, sell and distribute electronic or printed copies of the manuscript as a whole, of specific parts of the manuscript and its translations into any language;
- Use of the article by third parties is free, as long as the integrity of the publication is maintained and its original authors, first publication journal, and citation details are identified.
Within the terms of the license, authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in the journal.
