COMENTÁRIOS SOBRE O JULGAMENTO COLEGIADO ESTENDIDO DO ARTIGO 942 DO CPC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2024.86593Abstract
This article aims to make considerations about the judgment technique inserted in article 942 of the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015 to replace the Embargos Infringentes then established in the Code of Civil Procedure of 1973. It examines how the provision in the previous Code was, as well as the discussions that took place in the legislative process on non-unanimous judgments until reaching the provision approved by the National Congress. Using the deductive method with legislative and jurisprudential review and bibliographic research as a methodological option, the article analyzes the technique of article 942 of the CPC/2015 in detail and with notes on the understandings already drawn up by the Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Finally, the solutions that were given to the criticisms that were made to the Embargos Infringentes and the problems that remain in the current judgment technique are considered. It is concluded, on one hand, that the technique was conceived for the purpose of taking the disagreement seriously, encouraging deliberation among the judges due to the existence of a dissenting vote and, on the other hand, that the criticism of the delay in if the trial ends in the court is not resolved.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 André Garcia Leão Reis Valadares
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todos os artigos publicados na Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual (REDP) (Departamento de Direito Processual, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) são licenciados por meio de uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais de seu artigo e concordam em licenciar seu trabalho com a licença CC BY 4.0, aceitando assim os termos e condições específicos desta licença disponíveis no seguinte website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
- Os autores concedem à REDP o direito de primeira publicação, de se identificar como publicadora original do trabalho e concedem à revista uma licença de direitos não exclusivos para utilizar o trabalho das seguintes formas: Reproduzir, vender e distribuir cópias eletrônicas ou impressas do manuscrito como um todo, de partes específicas do manuscrito e de suas traduções para qualquer idioma;
- O uso do artigo por terceiros é livre, contanto que a integridade da publicação seja mantida e seus autores originais, periódico de primeira publicação e detalhes de citação sejam identificados.
Dentro dos termos da licença, os autores podem entrar em acordos contratuais adicionais separados para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada do trabalho na revista.
Copyright and Licensing
All articles published in the Procedural Law Electronic Review (REDP) (Department of Procedural Law, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) are licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors retain copyright to their article and agree to license their work under the CC BY 4.0 license, thereby accepting the specific terms and conditions of this license available at the following website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ legal code.
- Authors grant REDP the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher of the work, and grant the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: Reproduce, sell and distribute electronic or printed copies of the manuscript as a whole, of specific parts of the manuscript and its translations into any language;
- Use of the article by third parties is free, as long as the integrity of the publication is maintained and its original authors, first publication journal, and citation details are identified.
Within the terms of the license, authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in the journal.
