ESTADO DE COISAS INCONSTITUCIONAL E A INVERSÃO DA POLÍTICA PELO DIREITO À LUZ DO FENÔMENO DA SUPREMOCRACIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2024.86590Abstract
The present study presents as a problem theme the following question: is the Unconstitutional State of Affairs an effective way of protecting fundamental rights or just represents another face of judicial activism? As a hypothesis, the statement was drawn that there was no change in the Brazilian prison outlook after the recognition of the Unconstitutional State of Affairs, serving the decision in ADPF No. 347 only to establish the possibility of the Brazilian Supreme Court exercising an authentic supervisory jurisdiction over the other branchs. In view of this, the overall objective of the research is to analyze the Unconstitutional State of Affairs as a new aspect of judicial activism. For this, the concept of supremecracy of Oscar Vilhena Vieira was adopted as a theoretical framework. In the end, the study confirms the hypothesis, concluding that the adoption of the Colombian theory of the Unconstitutional State of Affairs by the Brazilian Supreme Court has a clear activist character, besides being an ineffective procedural alternative for the protection of fundamental rights. For this work, bibliographic research and hypothetical-deductive reasoning were used.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ana Luiza Goulart Peres Matos, Sérgio Henriques Zandona Freitas, Bruno Paiva Bernardes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todos os artigos publicados na Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual (REDP) (Departamento de Direito Processual, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) são licenciados por meio de uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais de seu artigo e concordam em licenciar seu trabalho com a licença CC BY 4.0, aceitando assim os termos e condições específicos desta licença disponíveis no seguinte website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
- Os autores concedem à REDP o direito de primeira publicação, de se identificar como publicadora original do trabalho e concedem à revista uma licença de direitos não exclusivos para utilizar o trabalho das seguintes formas: Reproduzir, vender e distribuir cópias eletrônicas ou impressas do manuscrito como um todo, de partes específicas do manuscrito e de suas traduções para qualquer idioma;
- O uso do artigo por terceiros é livre, contanto que a integridade da publicação seja mantida e seus autores originais, periódico de primeira publicação e detalhes de citação sejam identificados.
Dentro dos termos da licença, os autores podem entrar em acordos contratuais adicionais separados para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada do trabalho na revista.
Copyright and Licensing
All articles published in the Procedural Law Electronic Review (REDP) (Department of Procedural Law, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) are licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors retain copyright to their article and agree to license their work under the CC BY 4.0 license, thereby accepting the specific terms and conditions of this license available at the following website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ legal code.
- Authors grant REDP the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher of the work, and grant the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: Reproduce, sell and distribute electronic or printed copies of the manuscript as a whole, of specific parts of the manuscript and its translations into any language;
- Use of the article by third parties is free, as long as the integrity of the publication is maintained and its original authors, first publication journal, and citation details are identified.
Within the terms of the license, authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in the journal.
