PERSPECTIVAS DE APRIMORAMENTO DO CONTROLE JURISDICIONAL DE POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS: A RELATIVIZAÇÃO DA COISA JULGADA E A REMODELAGEM DA ESTRUTURA ADMINISTRATIVA DOS ÓRGÃOS JULGADORES

Authors

  • Acácio Acácio Miranda Silva Filho
  • Arthur Paku Ottolini Balbani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2024.86588

Abstract

Due to the Democratic Rule of Law, public policies’ judicial review is a new trend to the Judiciary since the State’s finality now demands him to be the fundamental rights’ guardian and to assure effective ways to make them concrete. However, the juridical structure adopted in Brazil, both related to Judiciary Administration and Civil Procedure, has not yet conceived this new perspective, struggling with the qualitative aspects of this type of control. By reviewing specialized bibliography on the theme and analysing the specific reality faced by Brazilian Courts in similar situations, this article aims to analyse possible proposals to upgrade the current mechanisms used for the public policies’ judicial review; this paper also proposes two different solutions to the issue, the first one related not only to the specialization of some judges, but also with reinforcements in Courts’ staff, and the second one related to the relativization of res judicata, aiming that both of them may be able to create a better environment to public policies’ judicial review. Both of these proposals are related to the conclusions of the paper, which indicates that the current structures and mechanisms are not enough to fulfil the contemporary control standards and that it is necessary to adopt a solution that integrates processual solutions (based on theory) and administrative mechanisms (based on concrete structures).

Published

2024-08-15

How to Cite

ACÁCIO MIRANDA SILVA FILHO, Acácio; PAKU OTTOLINI BALBANI, Arthur. PERSPECTIVAS DE APRIMORAMENTO DO CONTROLE JURISDICIONAL DE POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS: A RELATIVIZAÇÃO DA COISA JULGADA E A REMODELAGEM DA ESTRUTURA ADMINISTRATIVA DOS ÓRGÃOS JULGADORES. Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual, Rio de Janeiro, v. 25, n. 3, 2024. DOI: 10.12957/redp.2024.86588. Disponível em: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/86588. Acesso em: 1 may. 2025.