JUDICIARY OF THE 21ST CENTURY: HOW THE LITERATURE SUGGESTS A NEW WAY TO EVALUATE THE JUDICIARY USING THE PERCEPTION OF CITIZENS

Authors

  • Carlos Augusto Costa
  • Raul Manuel Silva Laureano
  • Carla Winter Afonso

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2024.85249

Abstract

It is essential to implement a new way of evaluating the judiciary that considers the perception of citizens, particularly in the 21st century, where there is a pressing need to involve society in discussions about improving public services. In addition to utilizing information from specialists such as lawyers, public servants, and judges, citizens can provide a new perspective that can help enhance the quality of judiciary services. The objective of this article is to present the state-of-the-art on the subject of "Judiciary Evaluation" and how citizens' perceptions can be integrated into this process. The findings of the theoretical study reveal a lack of research on citizen and judiciary evaluation, emphasizing the importance of including citizens in the judiciary evaluation model.

Published

2024-06-20

How to Cite

COSTA, Carlos Augusto; SILVA LAUREANO, Raul Manuel; WINTER AFONSO, Carla. JUDICIARY OF THE 21ST CENTURY: HOW THE LITERATURE SUGGESTS A NEW WAY TO EVALUATE THE JUDICIARY USING THE PERCEPTION OF CITIZENS. Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual, Rio de Janeiro, v. 25, n. 2, 2024. DOI: 10.12957/redp.2024.85249. Disponível em: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/85249. Acesso em: 7 dec. 2025.