PLACE OF SPEECH IN JUDICIAL ACTIVITY AND THE MITH OF THE AUTHENTIC INTERPRETATION

Authors

  • Manoel Pedro Ribas de Lima Centro Universitário UniBrasil, Curitiba, PR
  • Susana Maria Bartmeyer Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, PR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2022.58649

Keywords:

decision, judicial activity, place of speech, authentic interpretation, norm

Abstract

This article evaluates judicial activity through the place of speech. If it is up to the parties to claim from their positions in society and, against each other, to plead them, it behooves to the judge, overcoming such perspectives, to act neutrally. An instrument at hand is the norm, which, although manipulable, identifies a minimal semantic scope as resistance. The judge, however, can also overcome it by his privileged institutional position. That supplement is exemplified by recurring court decisions, which form a solid jurisprudential set, and constitutes a misuse of the place of speech. Authentic interpretation arises as a trick.

Author Biographies

Manoel Pedro Ribas de Lima, Centro Universitário UniBrasil, Curitiba, PR

Mestre pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito do UniBrasil. Especialista em Direito Processual Civil pela Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG). Advogado. Ponta Grossa/PR. E-mail: manoel@ribasdelima.com.br.

Susana Maria Bartmeyer, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, PR

Bacharel em Direito e mestranda do Programa de PósGraduação em Ciências Sociais Aplicadas da Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG). Ponta Grossa/PR. E-mail: smbartmeyer@hotmail.com.

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

DE LIMA, Manoel Pedro Ribas; BARTMEYER, Susana Maria. PLACE OF SPEECH IN JUDICIAL ACTIVITY AND THE MITH OF THE AUTHENTIC INTERPRETATION. Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual, Rio de Janeiro, v. 23, n. 1, 2021. DOI: 10.12957/redp.2022.58649. Disponível em: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/58649. Acesso em: 2 may. 2025.