Personas y cosas en el plano medio del derecho / People and things in the midplane of the right
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2015.16917Resumo
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2015.16917
Trabalho enviado em 06 de maio de 2015. Aceito em 14 de junho de 2015.
Resumen:
La tendencia moderna de considerar metafísicamente las cosas en sí y por sí, al margen de las circunstancias (un modo de estudiar la realidad que lo iniciaron en su versión más extrema los jesuitas españoles de comienzos del siglo XVII) ha llevado a una extraña entificación unitaria del concepto del derecho. Leyendo a Kelsen, Rawls o Habermas, se percibe que ellos piensan en el derecho como una cosa que puede ser definida globalmente, del mismo modo que un cuerpo físico; el derecho sería así una realidad prácticamente tangible que se conoce en un solo concepto, y la tentación primera ha sido la de proporcionar un concepto de lo jurídico –¡la quimera decimonónica de la búsqueda del “concepto del derecho”!- que por sí mismo y por sus propias virtualidades, expulse de modo uniforme o igualmente reglado para todos los casos, cualquier posible injusticia. En el presente artículo el autor busca discutir las personas y las cosas por en el plan medio del derecho porque el autor de estas páginas está convencido que el ser humano tiene derechos porque es persona, y no acepta que sean las personas las que deben su condición a razonamientos que ellos mismas hacen; y, puesto a tratar este tema, alude a la naturaleza de estos constructos que nos otorgan tantos derechos, pues atisba que si hay derechos humanos, esta cualidad de humanidad no se deriva desde las construcciones lógico-abstractas, sino a que el autor de alguna de estas teorías es un ser humano.
Palabras clave: Entificación del concepto de derecho / ser humano / humanidad
Abstract
The modern tendency of metaphysically consider things in and of itself, regardless of the circumstances (a way of studying the reality that began in its most extreme version of the Spanish Jesuits in the early seventeenth century) has led to a strange unit Rentification of the concept of law. Reading Kelsen, Rawls or Habermas, it is perceived that they think of law as something that can be defined globally, just as a physical body; the right would be practically a tangible reality known in one concept, and the first temptation has been to provide a legal concept -¡ the nineteenth-century chimera of the search for the "concept of law"! - which itself and their own virtues, eject uniformly regulated or equally for all cases, any possible injustice. In this article the author seeks to discuss people and things in the middle plan of law because the author of these pages is convinced that human beings have rights because is a person, and does not accept that they are the people that owe their condition to arguments that they themselves do; and, as to this issue, refers to the nature of these constructs that give us many rights, for watches that if there are human rights, the quality of humanness is not derived from the logical-abstract constructions, once the author of some of these theories is a human being.
Keywords: Entification of the concept of law / human / humanity
Downloads
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Os Direitos autorais patrimoniais dos artigos publicados pertencem à Revista Quaestio Iuris. A reprodução total dos artigos desta revista em outras publicações, ou para qualquer outra utilidade, é permitida a todos, para que distribuam, remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do trabalho aqui publicado, mesmo para fins comerciais, desde que atribuam o devido crédito pela criação original ao autor e o crédito à Revista Quaestio Iuris pela primeira publicação do trabalho. A Revista Quaestio Iuris obedece aos termos da licença Creative Commons de Atribuição 4.0 Internacional CC-BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), em consonância com a legislação autoral brasileira, Lei 9.610/1998.
The patrimonial copyrights of the published articles belong to the Quaestio Iuris Law Review. The total reproduction of the articles of this review in other publications, or for any other use, is allowed to all, to distribute, remix, adapt and create from the work published here, even for commercial purposes, as long as they give due credit for the original creation to the author and credit to Quaestio Iuris Lae Review for the first publication of the work. The Quaestio Iuris Law Review complies with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), in accordance with brazilian copyright law, Law 9.610/1998.