The moral perversion of the non-profit principle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2024.80134Keywords:
reproductive markets, morals, corruption, perversion, non-profit principleAbstract
Social Anthropology repeatedly denounces the principle of non-profit in the field of biomedicine, enforced in those countries as part of the so-called Oviedo Convention of the Council of Europe, which is called into question. There are four types of arguments for these complaints: 1) symbology; 2) technology; 3) power relations; and 4) morals. In order to sustain reproductive markets, it is necessary to build a discourse around the application of techniques in assisted human reproduction. This work provides an explanation for the main criticism used by moral philosophy, namely, arguments that deal with the corruption of the human body. We also provide a theoretical explanation for the implementation of the principle of no profit.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Os Direitos autorais patrimoniais dos artigos publicados pertencem à Revista Quaestio Iuris. A reprodução total dos artigos desta revista em outras publicações, ou para qualquer outra utilidade, é permitida a todos, para que distribuam, remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do trabalho aqui publicado, mesmo para fins comerciais, desde que atribuam o devido crédito pela criação original ao autor e o crédito à Revista Quaestio Iuris pela primeira publicação do trabalho. A Revista Quaestio Iuris obedece aos termos da licença Creative Commons de Atribuição 4.0 Internacional CC-BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), em consonância com a legislação autoral brasileira, Lei 9.610/1998.
The patrimonial copyrights of the published articles belong to the Quaestio Iuris Law Review. The total reproduction of the articles of this review in other publications, or for any other use, is allowed to all, to distribute, remix, adapt and create from the work published here, even for commercial purposes, as long as they give due credit for the original creation to the author and credit to Quaestio Iuris Lae Review for the first publication of the work. The Quaestio Iuris Law Review complies with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), in accordance with brazilian copyright law, Law 9.610/1998.
