PARTIAL EARLY JUDGMENT OF THE MERIT: CONSIDERATIONS IN THE LIGHT OF THE FUNCTIONAL POWER OF PROCEDURAL MANAGEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2022.62817Keywords:
Partial early judgment on the merits, Procedural management, Functional power, Faculty, discretionAbstract
The nature of partial early judgment on the merits, whether the magistrate's duty or his faculty, has been debated by the doctrine, as was, at the time of CPC/1973, the nature of the early judgment of the dispute. In this article, it is argued that this discussion is put in the wrong terms, since the judge does not have pure faculties, but functional powers, and it must be analyzed which margin of discretion linked to the legal order is attributed to the exercise of such power. . It is indicated that the functional power of procedural management is relevant to answer this question, and serves to delimit the hypotheses in which there should or should not be a partial advance judgment of the merits due to considerations related to its functional aspects. Such understanding is demonstrated through the proposition of six criteria arising from the procedural management, which are relevant to assess the fulfillment of the functional presupposition of the institute of partial advance judgment of the merits.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Todos os artigos publicados na Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual (REDP) (Departamento de Direito Processual, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) são licenciados por meio de uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0).
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais de seu artigo e concordam em licenciar seu trabalho com a licença CC BY 4.0, aceitando assim os termos e condições específicos desta licença disponíveis no seguinte website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
- Os autores concedem à REDP o direito de primeira publicação, de se identificar como publicadora original do trabalho e concedem à revista uma licença de direitos não exclusivos para utilizar o trabalho das seguintes formas: Reproduzir, vender e distribuir cópias eletrônicas ou impressas do manuscrito como um todo, de partes específicas do manuscrito e de suas traduções para qualquer idioma;
- O uso do artigo por terceiros é livre, contanto que a integridade da publicação seja mantida e seus autores originais, periódico de primeira publicação e detalhes de citação sejam identificados.
Dentro dos termos da licença, os autores podem entrar em acordos contratuais adicionais separados para a distribuição não exclusiva da versão publicada do trabalho na revista.
Copyright and Licensing
All articles published in the Procedural Law Electronic Review (REDP) (Department of Procedural Law, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) are licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors retain copyright to their article and agree to license their work under the CC BY 4.0 license, thereby accepting the specific terms and conditions of this license available at the following website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ legal code.
- Authors grant REDP the right of first publication, to identify itself as the original publisher of the work, and grant the journal a non-exclusive license to use the work in the following ways: Reproduce, sell and distribute electronic or printed copies of the manuscript as a whole, of specific parts of the manuscript and its translations into any language;
- Use of the article by third parties is free, as long as the integrity of the publication is maintained and its original authors, first publication journal, and citation details are identified.
Within the terms of the license, authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in the journal.
