REASONING IN JUDICIAL DECISIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS: CONVENTIONAL INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 489, § 1º. OF BRAZILIAN CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES BY INTERAMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CASE-LAW

Authors

  • Vitor Fonsêca Faculdade La Salle Manaus, Manaus, AM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/redp.2022.59119

Keywords:

reasoning in judicial decisions, article 489, § 1º, of Brazilian Civil Procedure Rules, article 8 of American Convention of Human Rights, case-law, Interamerican Court of Human Rights

Abstract

Reasoning in judicial decisions is an important guarantee in Brazilian Civil Procedure Rules, especially after article 489, § 1º.. However few studies try to compare these rules to international standards of Interamerican Court of Human Rights case-law. This paper presents a collection of cases in Interamerican Court case-law related to reasoning in judicial decisions, comparing them to national standards of article 489, § 1º, of Brazilian Civil Procedure Rules.

Author Biography

Vitor Fonsêca, Faculdade La Salle Manaus, Manaus, AM

Professor da Faculdade La Salle Manaus. Doutor (PUC/SP). Promotor de Justiça (AM).

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

FONSÊCA, Vitor. REASONING IN JUDICIAL DECISIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS: CONVENTIONAL INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 489, § 1º. OF BRAZILIAN CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES BY INTERAMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CASE-LAW. Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual, Rio de Janeiro, v. 23, n. 1, 2021. DOI: 10.12957/redp.2022.59119. Disponível em: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/59119. Acesso em: 9 may. 2025.