cultivating oppositional debt ethics and consciousness: philosophy for/with children as counter-conduct in the neoliberal debt economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2020.53125Keywords:
Debt, Philosophy for/with children, counter-conductAbstract
In this article, I examine what the ethical and political implications of conceptualizing and practicing philosophy for/with children (P4wC) in the neoliberal debt economy are. Though P4wC cannot alone bring about any significant transformation of debt political-economic realities, it can play an important role in cultivating oppositional debt ethics and consciousness. The first half of this article situates P4wC within the current global debt economy. Here, I summarize the analyses made by critical theorists of the ways that debt impacts public institutions (including schools), and shapes individual subjectivity. The second half of this article builds on Michel Foucault’s conceptualization of “counter-conduct.” For Foucault, counter-conduct is an ethical/political act of resistance against governmentality, one that makes possible alternative social relations and ways of being in the world. I argue in this section that P4wC should be conceptualized, and practiced, as form of counter-conduct that challenges power in the debt economy. Both the form of P4wC pedagogy, and the content that can be taken up in a collective manner in communities of inquiry, make P4wC a potential site for debt counter-conduct practices. Thought of as counter-conduct, P4wC is an educational practice with liberatory promise. I conclude this piece with brief ruminations on practicing P4wC in the time of COVID, and during the uprisings around the world against racial capitalism. It is suggested here that P4wC not only be practiced within formal education settings, but also in the social movements that are fighting to bring into being a world more just for all of us.
En este artículo, examino cuáles son las implicaciones éticas y políticas de conceptualizar y practicar la filosofía para / con niños (P4wC) en la economía de la deuda neoliberal. Aunque P4wC no puede provocar por sí solo ninguna transformación significativa de las realidades político-económicas de la deuda, puede desempeñar un papel importante en el cultivo de una ética y una conciencia de la deuda opuestas. La primera mitad de este artículo sitúa a P4wC dentro de la economía de deuda global actual. Aquí, resumo los análisis realizados por teóricos críticos sobre las formas en que la deuda afecta a las instituciones públicas (incluidas las escuelas) y configura la subjetividad individual. La segunda mitad de este artículo se basa en la conceptualización de la "contra-conducta" de Michel Foucault. Para Foucault, la contra-conducta es un acto ético / político de resistencia contra la gobernamentalidad, que posibilita relaciones sociales y formas de estar en el mundo alternativas. Sostengo en esta sección que P4wC debe conceptualizarse y practicarse como una forma de contra-conducta que desafía el poder en la economía de la deuda. Tanto la forma pedagógica de P4wC, como su contenido adoptados de manera colectiva en las comunidades de investigación, hacen de P4wC un sitio potencial para las prácticas de contra-conducta de la deuda. Pensada como una contra-conducta, P4wC es una práctica educativa con promesa liberadora. Concluyo este artículo con breves reflexiones sobre la práctica de P4wC en la época de COVID y de los alzamientos en todo el mundo contra el capitalismo racial. Aquí se sugiere que P4wC no solo se practique dentro de los entornos de educación formal, sino también en los movimientos sociales que luchan por crear un mundo más justo para todos nosotros.
Key Words: Debt (Deuda), Philosophy for/with Children (P4wC) (Filosofía para / con niños), Counter-Conduct (contra-conducta)
References
References
American Association of University Women, (2017). Deeper in debt: Women and student loans. https://www.aauw.org/resources/research/deeper-in-debt/.
Backer, D., Bissen, M., Laroche, J., Perisic, A., Wozniak, J., What is horizontal pedagogy? A discussion on dandelions. In: Haworth, R. H., & Elmore, J. M. (Eds.) Out of the ruins: The emergence of radical informal learning spaces (195-222). Oakland, CA: PM Press.
Balibar, E. (2013). Politics of Debt, Postmodern Culture Vol. 23 (3). 1-35. Retrieved 9.14.15. from Project Muse Database.
Brusi, R., Bonilla, Y., and Godreau, I., (9/20/2018). When disaster capitalism comes for the University of Puerto Rico. The Nation. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/when-disaster-capitalism-comes-for-the-university-of-puerto-rico/).
Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.
Caffentzis, G. (2013). Reflections on the history of debt resistance: The case of El Barzón. Retrieved from http://strikedebt.org/elbarzon/.
Caffentzis, G. (2016). Everyday life in the shadow of the debt economy. In: Schraube E. & Højholt (Eds.) Psychology and the conduct of everyday life (176-192). London: Routledge.
Cavallero, L. and Gago, V. (2019). Una lectura feminista de la deuda: ¡Vivas, libres y desendeudadas nos queremos!. Buenos Aires: Fundación Rosa Luxemburgo.
Davidson, A.I .(2011). In praise of counter-conduct. History of the Human Sciences. 24(4): 25-41.
De Sousa-Santos, B. (2016). Epistemologies of the South and the future. From the European South vol.1. 17-29. Retrieved from: http://www.boaventuradesousasantos.pt/media/Epistemologies%20of%20the%20south%20and%20the%20future_Poscolonialitalia_2016.pdf.
Derrida, J. (1992). Given time: I. Counterfeit money. (P. Kamuf, Trans.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Donnelly-Derovan, C. (2019). When the children leave: What’s left after a mass exodus of young people from Puerto Rico? The Hechinger Report. https://hechingerreport.org/when-the-children-leave-whats-left-after-a-mass-exodus-of-young-people-from-puerto-rico/)
Dussel, E. (1988). Ethics and community. (Robert R. Barr, Trans.) Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
Dussel, E. (2013). Ethics of liberation in the age of globalization and exclusion. (E. Mendieta, C. P. Bustillo, Y. Angulo & N.M. Torres, Trans.) Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the College de France 1977-1978. (G. Burchell, Trans.) New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978-1979. (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
Freire, P. (1989). A importância do ato de ler: Em três artigos que se completam. São Paulo: Autores Associados.
Freire, P. (2001). Política e educação. São Paulo: Cortez.
Freire, P. (2017). Professora sim, tia não: cartas a quem ousa ensinar. São Paulo: Olho d’Água.
Graeber, D. (2012). Debt: The first 5,000 years. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House.
Gregory, M. (2011). Philosophy for children and its critics: A Mendham dialogue. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(2). 199-219.
Hartman, S. V. (1997). Scenes of subjection: Terror, slavery, and self-making in Nineteenth-Century America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hartman, S. (2007). Lose your mother: A journey along the Atlantic slave route. Farrar, Straus and Giroux: New York.
Hartman, S. (2019). Wayward lives, beautiful experiments: Intimate histories of social upheaval. New York: W.W. Norton.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Institute for New Economic Thinking. (7/21/2020). Debt talks episode 1: The secular rise of debt. https://www.ineteconomics.org/events/debt-talks-the-secular-rise-of-debt.
International Council of Philosophical Inquiry with Children, Biennial Conference, (2019). Philosophy for/with Children and the Citizen-Agent: Main Topic. https://eventos.uniminuto.edu/20862/section/12843/icpic-2019.html).
Kennedy, D. and Kohan, W.O. (2014). school and the future of scholé: A preliminary dialogue. childhood and philosophy, 10(19), 199-216.
Laverty, M. and Gregory, M. (2017). pragmatism and the unlearning of learnification. childhood and philosophy, 13(28), 521-536.
Lazzarato, M. (2012). The making of the indebted man. (J.D. Jordan, Trans.). Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
Lazzarato, M. (2015). Governing by debt. (J.D. Jordan, Trans.). Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
Marx, K. (1845). Theses on Feuerbach. (C. Smith, Trans.). Retrieved from: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/index.htm.
Philadelphia School District Office of Management & Budget. (2020). Philadelphia School District 2019-2020 Adopted Operating Budget: Quick Budget Facts.
https://www.philasd.org/budget/budget-facts/quick-budget-facts/.
Rich, A. (1987). Dreamwood. The Poetry Foundation. Retrieved on 31March 2017 from https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poetrymagazine/poems/detail/55629.
Rizzo, E. (10/31/2019). Pa. quietly reverses ‘lunch shaming’ ban as school district debt grows. WHYY PBS. https://whyy.org/articles/pa-quietly-reverses-lunch-shaming-ban-as-school-district-debt-grows/#:~:text=Superintendent%20William%20Harner%20says%20lunch,peak%20of%20%2427%2C000%20last%20year.
Ross, A. (2013). Creditocracy and the case for debt refusal. New York: OR Books.
Sharp, A.M. (2009). The child as critic. In: Marsal, E., Dobashi, T., Weber, B. Children philosophize worldwide: Theoretical and practical concepts. 201-209.
Streeck, W. (2017). Buying time: The delayed crisis of democratic capitalism. (P. Camiller and D. Fernbach, Trans.) New York: Verso.
Way, J. (2019). On Philadelphia’s toxic schools. Remarks at Community Meeting to Heal our Toxic Schools. Philadelphia, PA.
Wozniak, J.T. (2017). Towards a rhythmanalysis of debt dressage: Education as rhythmic resistance in everyday indebted life. Policy Futures in Education. 0(0). 1-14.
