Precautionary labeling: challenges and possibilities for international standards on allergen labeling

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12957/demetra.2025.83622

Keywords:

Food Allergy. Precautionary principle. International commerce. Human rights.

Abstract

Introduction: The treatment of food allergies, which affect 10% of the world's population, is the exclusion diet. The way information on the intentional presence of allergens in labeling is provided is more consensual, but the strategy to warn about the risk of unintended presence (precautionary labeling) is very variable among countries, resulting in a challenge to people living with food allergies. Objective: To present the solutions that countries have adopted for precautionary labeling and to highlight the ongoing debate in the Codex Alimentarius, proposing an approach that recognizes the duty to comply with human rights protection standards in the context of discussions on guidelines for international trade. Methods: A propositional legal method, including comparison of laws, evaluation of Codex Alimentarius documentation, as well as international references on the protection and promotion of human rights. Results: There are different regulatory strategies, each based on the experience and information available at the time of their approval. The solution under discussion at Codex results in a risk of reactions in a number of allergy sufferers without labeling information regarding the potential unintended presence of allergens, which violates the precautionary principle and human rights regulations. Conclusions: Consumer health should be the lens for the design of regulations and guidelines. In case of uncertainties, the policy that provides the highest level of protection must be adopted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maria Cecília Cury Chaddad, Põe no Rótulo. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Desde 2013, dedica-se a promoção de ações voltadas a garantir um ambiente mais seguro para quem convive com alergia alimentar: rótulos claros, inclusão escolar, garantia de direitos fundamentais, sendo a Diretora Executiva do movimento Põe no Rótulo, que, por meio de ações de advocacy, atuou como catalisador no processo de discussão e aprovação da norma que dispõe sobre a rotulagem obrigatória de alergênicos em alimentos e que tem atuado na promoção do direito humano à alimentação adequada por meio do aprimoramento dos requisitos de rotulagem de alimentos desde então. 

References

1. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Food allergies – Leaving no one behind [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Dec 13]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cb2868en

2. Flokstra-de Blok BMJ, Dubois AEJ, Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, Oude Elberink JNG, Raat H, DunnGalvin A, et al. Health-related quality of life of food allergic patients: comparison with the general population and other diseases. Allergy. 2010 Feb;65(2):238–44.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02121.x

3. Chaddad MCC. Rotulagem de alimentos: o direito à informação, à proteção da saúde e à alimentação adequada da população com alergia alimentar. Curitiba: Juruá; 2014.

4. Codex Alimentarius Commission. Norma general del Codex para el etiquetado de los alimentos preenvasados - CODEX STAN 1-1985. 1985.

5. Food and Agriculture Organization y World Health Organization (FAO y WHO). Report of the 45th Session of the Codex Committee on Food Labelling (CCFL) [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Dec 13]. Disponible en: https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FMeetings%252FCX-714-45%252FFinal%252520Report%252FREP19_FLe.pdf

6. Food and Agriculture Organization(FAO). Report of the FAO technical consultation on food allergies [Internet]. 1995 [cited 2023 Dec 10]. Disponible en: http://www.fao.org/3/cb6867en/cb6867en.pdf

7. Codex Alimentarius Commission. ALINORM 99/37 [Internet]. 1999 [cited 2023 Dec 10]. Disponible en: https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FMeetings%252FCX-701-23%252Fal99_37s.pdf.

8. Muraro A, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, Holzhauser T, Poulsen LK, Gowland MH, Akdis CA, et al. EAACI Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Guidelines. Protecting consumers with food allergies: understanding food consumption, meeting regulations and identifying unmet needs. Allergy. 2014 Jul 29;69(11):1464–72.https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12453

9. DunnGalvin A, Chan CH, Crevel R, Grimshaw K, Poms R, Schnadt S, et al. Precautionary allergen labeling: perspectives from key stakeholder groups. Allergy. 2015 Jun 25;70(9):1039–51.https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12614

10. Turner PJ, Gowland MH. Precautionary allergen labelling: NO MORE TRACES! Allergy. 2016 Sep 14;71(10):1505–7.https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12961

11. Roses JB. Food allergen law and the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004: falling short of true protection for food allergy sufferers. PubMed. 2011 Jan 1;66(2):225–42, ii.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24505841/

12. Canada. Consultation on Health Canada’s Food Allergen Precautionary Labelling Policy Renewal – Summary of Comments from the Online and Face-to-Face Consultation Sessions [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2023 Dec 10]. Disponible en: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/migration/hc-sc/fn-an/alt_formats/pdf/consult/_allergen2009/labelling-consult-etiquetage-eng.pdf.

13. Canada. The Use of Food Allergen Precautionary Statements on Prepackaged Foods [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2023 Dec 10]. Disponible en: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/migration/hc-sc/fn-an/alt_formats/pdf/label-etiquet/allergen/precaution_label-etiquette-eng.pdf

14. Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica (ANMAT) y Ministerio de Salud. Directrices para el rotulado de alérgenos y sustancias capaces de producir reacciones adversas en individuos susceptibles de productos alimenticios envasados [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Dec 10]. Disponible en: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/anmat-directrices_rotulado_alergenos_0.pdf

15. Food and Agriculture Organizationy World Health Organization (FAO y WHO). Code of practice on food allergen management for food business operators - CXC 80-2020 [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Dec 10]. Disponible en: https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FCXC%2B80-2020%252FCXC_080e.pdf

16. Food and Agriculture Organizationy World Health Organization (FAO y WHO). Risk Assessment of Food Allergens. Part 1: Review and validation of Codex Alimentarius priority allergen list through risk assessment [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Dec 10]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4060/cb9070en

17. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Approaches To Establish Thresholds for Major Food Allergens and for Gluten in Food. Journal of Food Protection. 2008 May 1;71(5):1043–88.https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-71.5.1043

18. Food and Agriculture Organizationy World Health Organization (FAO y WHO). Risk Assessment of Food Allergens. Part 2: Review and establish threshold levels in foods for the priority allergens [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Dec 10]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4060/cc2946en

19. Food and Agriculture Organizationy World Health Organization (FAO y WHO). Risk assessment of food allergens – Part 3: Review and establish precautionary labelling in foods of the priority allergens. FAO; WHO; eBooks. 2023 May 19;

20. Costa LC, Rezende ER, Segundo GRS. Growth Parameters Impairment in Patients with Food Allergies. Journal of Allergy [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2019 Apr 3];2014:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/980735

21. Meyer R, De Koker C, Dziubak R, Venter C, Dominguez-Ortega G, Cutts R, et al. Malnutrition in children with food allergies in the UK. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 2013 Aug 13;27(3):227–35.https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12149

22. Fachin M. Direitos Humanos e Desenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar; 2015.

23. Chaddad MCC. Revisión de los requisitos de etiquetado nutricional de alimentos en América Latina: un análisis de la normativa del comercio internacional desde la perspectiva de la centralidad de los derechos humanos. In: Guarnizo Peralta D, Urueña Hernandez R, Carballo JM, editores. Derecho, comercio y etiquetado nutricional: reflexiones y experiencias desde América Latina. Bogotá: Editorial Dejusticia; 2022.

24. Comité de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales. ODS HOME PAGE [Internet]. documents-dds-ny.un.org. 1999 [cited 2023 Dec 8]. Disponible en: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G99/420/15/PDF/G9942015.pdf?OpenElement

25. Shaw S, Schwartz R. UNU-IAS Report Trading Precaution: The Precautionary Principle and the WTO [Internet]. 2005 Nov [cited 2023 Dec 10]. Disponible en: https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:3103/Precautionary_Principle_and_WTO.pdf

26. Canada. A framework for the application of precaution in science-based decision making about risk [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2023 Dec 10]. Disponible en: https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/246284/publication.html

Published

2025-06-24

How to Cite

1.
Cury Chaddad MC. Precautionary labeling: challenges and possibilities for international standards on allergen labeling. DEMETRA [Internet]. 2025 Jun. 24 [cited 2025 Jun. 28];20:e83622. Available from: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/demetra/article/view/83622

Issue

Section

Food and Nutrition in Collective Health