Diet quality of adolescent students at State Technical Schools of São Paulo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/demetra.2025.77684Keywords:
Adolescent. Diet. High school.Abstract
Objective: To identify the diet quality and associated factors of adolescent students from public school system in accordance with the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population. Methods: The research sample was determined by simple random sampling procedures. An electronic questionnaire was administered containing questions to assess diet quality and sociodemographic characteristics: age, sex, skin color, family income, and maternal education. Diet quality was assessed using the diet quality scale (ESQUADA), with scores categorized as “very poor,” “poor,” “good,” “very good,” and “excellent” to evaluate the association with sociodemographic data using the chi-square test and correspondence analysis. A significance level of 95% was adopted. Results: A total of 733 adolescents participated in the study, 55.25% of whom were girls, with a mean age of 16 years old. The majority (79%) had a ‘good’ diet quality. ‘Very good’ and ‘poor’ diet quality were observed in 8% and 13%, respectively. A correspondence was observed between better diet quality and male adolescents who were older and had higher income. Conclusion: It was possible to assess the public school adolescents’ diet quality by describing their food intake and eating habits in accordance with the Guide. The findings are fundamental for the planning and implementation of food and nutrition public policies aimed at this population.
Downloads
References
1. Morais DDC, Moraes LFDS, Silva DCGD, Pinto CA, Novaes JFD. Aspectos metodológicos da avaliação da qualidade da dieta no Brasil: revisão sistemática. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2017;22(8):2671–80. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232017228.23502015
2. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Guia alimentar para a população brasileira / Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica. 2. ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2014.
3. Cannon G, Leitzmann C. Food and nutrition science: the new paradigm. Asia Pac J ClinNutr. 2022;31(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202203_31(1).0001
4. Maia EG, Silva LES da, Santos MAS, Barufaldi LA, Silva SU da, Claro RM. Padrões alimentares, características sociodemográficas e comportamentais entre adolescentes brasileiros. RevBrasEpidemiol. 2018;21(suppl 1):e180009. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720180009.supl.1
5. Chen X, Zhang Z, Yang H, Qiu P, Wang H, Wang F, et al. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health outcomes: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Nutr J. 2020;19(1):86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-020-00604-1
6. Ronca DB, Blume CA, Cureau FV, Camey SA, Leotti VB, Drehmer M, Schaan BD, Carvalho KMB. Diet quality index for Brazilian adolescents: the ERICA study. European Journal of Nutrition. 2020;59:539–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-01923-8
7. Alkerwi A. Diet quality concept. Nutrition. 2014;30(6):613–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2013.10.001
8. Wu XY, Zhuang LH, Li W, Guo HW, Zhang JH, Zhao YK, et al. The influence of diet quality and dietary behavior on health-related quality of life in the general population of children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(8):1989–2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02162-4
9. Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2017- 2018: avaliação nutricional da disponibilidade domiciliar de alimentos no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; 2020.
10. Rodrigues RM, Souza A de M, Bezerra IN, Pereira RA, YokooEM, Sichieri R. Evolução dos alimentos mais consumidos no Brasil entre 2008-2009 e 2017-2018. Rev Saúde Pública. 2021;55(Supl.1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003406
11. Louzada ML da C, Baraldi LG, Steele EM, Martins APB, Canella DS, Moubarac JC, et al. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and obesity in Brazilian adolescents and adults. Prev Med. 2015;81:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.07.018
12. Louzada ML da C, Costa C dos S, Souza TN, Cruz GL da, Levy RB, Monteiro CA. Impacto do consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados na saúde de crianças, adolescentes e adultos: revisão de escopo. Cad Saúde Pública. 2021;37(suppl 1):e00323020. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00323020
13. Costa CS, Del-Ponte B, Assunção MCF, Santos IS. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and body fat during childhood and adolescence: a systematic review. Public Health Nutrition. 2017; 21(1),148–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017001331
14. Poti JM, Braga B, Qin B. Ultra-processed Food Intake and Obesity: What Really Matters for Health – Processing or Nutrient Content? CurrObes Rep. 2017;6(4):420–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-017-0285-4
15. Cunha DB, da Costa THM, da Veiga GV, Pereira RA, Sichieri R. Ultra-processed food consumption and adiposity trajectories in a Brazilian cohort of adolescents: ELANA study. Nutr Diabetes. 2018;8(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41387-018-0043-z
16. Louzada ML da C, Ricardo CZ, Steele EM, Levy RB, Cannon G, Monteiro CA. The share of ultra-processed foods determines the overall nutritional quality of diets in Brazil. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(1):94–102. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017001434
17. Lane MM, Davis JA, Beattie S, Gómez‐Donoso C, Loughman A, O’Neil A, et al. Ultraprocessed food and chronic noncommunicable diseases: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of 43 observational studies. Obes Rev. 2021;22(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13146
18. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Lawrence M, Costa Louzada ML, Pereira Machado P. Ultra-processed foods, diet quality, and health using the NOVA classification system. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO); 2019.
19. Vandevijvere S, De Ridder K, Fiolet T, Bel S, Tafforeau J. Consumption of ultra-processed food products and diet quality among children, adolescents and adults in Belgium. Eur J Nutr. 2019;58(8):3267–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-018-1870-3
20. Santos TSS, Araújo PHM, Andrade DF, Louzada MLC, Assis MAA, Slater B. Duas evidências de validade da ESQUADA e níveis de qualidade da dieta dos brasileiros. RevSaude Publica. 2021;55:39. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055002397
21. Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2017- 2018: análise do consumo alimentar no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; 2020.
22. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa nacional de saúde do escolar: 2019. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2021.
23. Santos TSS, Sato PM, Carriero MR, Lopes CP, Segura IE, Scagliusi FB, Assis MAAA, Villar BS. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the relevance, clarity, and comprehensibility of the Scale of Quality of Diet (ESQUADA). Arch LatinomamerNutr. 2018;68:4. https://doi.org/10.37527/2018.68.4.003
24. Costa e Silva DM, Santos TSS, Conde WL, Slater B. Estado nutricional e risco metabólico em adultos: associação com a qualidade da dieta medida pela ESQUADA. RevBrasEpidemiol. 2021;24:E210019. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720210019
25. Galvão LLP, Santos TSS, Slater B, Lyra CO, Rolim PM, Ramalho AA, et al. Diet quality and associated factors in Brazilian undergraduates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Nutr. 2023;10:1169147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1169147
26. Costa e Silva DM, Santos TSS, Slater B. ESQUADA e sua correlação com os marcadores de alimentação em inquérito de saúde: evidências de validade. Rev Contexto&Saúde. 2024;24:48. https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-7114.2024.48.14141
27. Samejima FA. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika.1969;34:1-97.
28. Wendpap LL, Ferreira MG, Rodrigues PRM, Pereira RA, Loureiro A da S, Gonçalves-Silva RMV. Qualidade da dieta de adolescentes e fatores associados. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014;30(1):97–106. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00082412
29. Castilhos CB de, Schneider BC, Muniz LC, Assunção MCF. Qualidade da dieta de jovens aos 18 anos de idade, pertencentes à coorte de nascimentos de 1993 da cidade de Pelotas (RS), Brasil. CiêncSaúdeColetiva. 2015;20(11):3309–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320152011.17822014
30. Haddad MR, Sarti FM. Sociodemographic determinants of health behaviors among Brazilian adolescents: Trends in physical activity and food consumption, 2009–2015. Appetite. 2020;144:104454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104454
31. Maciel BLL, Lyra C de O, Gomes JRC, Rolim PM, Gorgulho BM, Nogueira PS, et al. Food Insecurity and Associated Factors in Brazilian Undergraduates during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Nutrients. 2022;14(2):358. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14020358
32. Silva DMC, Santos TSS, Conde WL, Slater B. Estado nutricional e risco metabólico em adultos: associação com a qualidade da dieta medida pela ESQUADA. RevBrasEpidemiol. 2021;24:e210019. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720210019
33. Rocha LL, Gratão LHA, Carmo AS do, Costa ABP, Cunha C de F, Oliveira TRPR de, Mendes LL. School Type, Eating Habits, and Screen Time are Associated With Ultra-Processed Food Consumption Among Brazilian Adolescents. J AcadNutr Diet. 2021;121(6):1136-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2020.12.010
34. Lopes T dos S, Mello AV de, Nogueira LR, Leme ACB, Fisberg RM. Energy, nutrients and food sources in snacks for adolescents and young adults. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2022;40:e2020148. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2020148
35. Malta DC, Gomes CS, Barros MB de A, Lima MG, Silva AG da, Cardoso LS de M, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic and changes in the lifestyles of Brazilian adolescents. RevBrasEpidemiol. 2021;24:e210012. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720210012
36. Ruiz-Roso MB, de Carvalho Padilha P, Mantilla-Escalante DC, Ulloa N, Brun P, Acevedo-Correa D, et al. Covid-19 Confinement and Changes of Adolescent’s Dietary Trends in Italy, Spain, Chile, Colombia and Brazil. Nutrients. 2020;12(6):1807. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12061807
37. Botelho LV, Cardoso LDO, Canella DS. COVID-19 e ambiente alimentar digital no Brasil: reflexões sobre a influência da pandemia no uso de aplicativos de delivery de comida. Cad Saúde Pública. 2020;36(11):e00148020. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00148020
38. Ministério da Saúde (BR), Gabinete do Ministro. Portaria Interministerial nº 1.055, de 25 de abril de 2017. Redefine as regras e os critérios para adesão ao Programa Saúde na Escola - PSE por estados, Distrito Federal e municípios e dispõe sobre o respectivo incentivo financeiro para custeio de ações. Diário Oficial União. 26 abr 2017; Seção 1:36.
39. Brasil. Resolução nº 06, de 08 de maio de 2020. Dispõe sobre o atendimento da alimentação escolar aos alunos da educação básica no âmbito do Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar – PNAE. Diário Oficial da União. 12 de mai 2020; Edição 89; Seção:1:38.
40. Verly-Jr E, Pereira A da S, Marques ES, Horta PM, Canella DS, Cunha DB. Reducing ultra-processed foods and increasing diet quality in affordable and culturally acceptable diets: a study case from Brazil using linear programming. Br J Nutr. 2021;126(4):572–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114520004365
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 IVIA CAMPOS PREVITALI-SAMPAIO

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP RESPONSIBILITY
Title of the manuscript:
________________________________________________________
1. Statement of responsability
I certify that I have participated in the work above specified and take public responsibility for its content.
I certify that the manuscript represents an original work and that none of the material in the manuscript has been previously published, is included in another manuscript, or is currently under consideration for publication elsewhere, whether in printed form or in electronic media, except that described in the attachment.
In case of acceptance of this text by Demetra: Alimentação, Nutrição & Saude, I declare to be in accordance with the policy of public access and copyright adopted by Demetra, which provides as follows: (a) the authors retain the copyright and grant to the Journal the right of first publication, the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal; (b) authors are authorized to enter additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal; and (c) authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work.
2. Conflict of Interest Statement
I certify that there is no conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Date, signature and full address of all authors.