THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FOOD IN THE COURTS: AN ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12957/demetra.2014.10213Keywords:
decisão judicial, suplementação alimental, direito à saúdeAbstract
The legalization of public health policies has been addressing an increasingly comprehensive list of lawsuits and services, particularly in the realm of Human Right to Food. In view of this context, this research study aimed to examine and analyze lawsuits over the Human Right to Food filed in courts of five Brazilian regions. The research used primary data collected from copies of court proceedings. The period of analysis ranged between 2005 and 2008. The objective was to gather information on lawsuits resolved through transit in rem judicatam in a court of first instance. There were 62 requests for special dietary supplements, with particularly more cases in the southeastern region of the country. The plaintiffs were mostly children with different pathologies declared in the records, and no collective lawsuits were found in the sample. The study showed no evidence of prescriptions given by professional nutritionists or expert examinations requested by the judges. There were judgments made solely upon medical prescriptions. From the total court decisions analyzed, 91.77% of the decisions were favorable to the plaintiff and 8.33% of the decisions were unfavorable to the complaint. It was concluded that there is a strong growth trend of lawsuits on the issue of right to food because it is guaranteed by the Constitution.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/demetra.2014.10213
References
-Lei n° 11.246. Cria o Sistema Nacional de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional-SISVAN. 2006,set 15. DOU 1 (2006, set 18)
- Valente, F.L.S. Direito Humano à Alimentação: Desafios e Conquistas. São Paulo: Cortez, 2002.
- Emenda Constitucional n° 64. Altera o art. 6º da Constituição Federal, para introduzir a alimentação como direito social. 2010, fev 4. DOU 1 ( 2010, fev 4)
– Freitas Filho, R.; Lima, TM. Metodologia de Análise de Decisões. Trabalho publicado nos Anais do XIX Encontro Nacional do CONPEDI realizado em Fortaleza - CE nos dias 09, 10, 11 e 12 de Junho de 2010.
– Vieira FS.; Zucchi P. Distorções causadas pelas ações judiciais à política de medicamentos no Brasil. Revista de Saúde Pública. n.41, v.2, p.214-222, 2007.
– Chieffi AL.; Barata RB. Judicialização da política pública de assistência farmacêutica e equidade. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, n.25, v.8 p.1839-1849, ago, 2009.
- Medeiros M.; Diniz D.; Schwartz I.V.D. A tese da judicialização da saúde pelas elites: os medicamentos para mucopolissacaridose. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v.18 n.4, p.1089-1098, 2013.
- Delduque, MC.; Marques SB.. A Judicialização da política de assistência farmacêutica no Distrito Federal: diálogos entre a política e o direito. Brasília. Tempus Actas de Saúde Coletiva. v. 5, n. 4, 2011
- Romero, LCA Jurisprudência do Tribunal de Justiça do Distrito Federal em Ações de Medicamentos. Revista de Direito Sanitário, São Paulo v. 11, n. 2 p. 11-59 Jul./Out. 2010.
- Borges, DCL.; Ugá MAD. Conflitos e impasses da judicialização na obtenção de medicamentos: as decisões de 1a instância nas ações individuais contra o Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, em 2005. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, v.26, n.1, p. 59-69, jan, 2010.
- Souza, MV. et al. Medicamentos de alto custo para doenças raras no Brasil: o exemplo das doenças lisossômicas Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 15(Supl. 3) p.3443-3454, 2010.
- Petean E. et al. Direito à saúde: demanda por suplementos no Tribunal de Justiça. Revista. Eletrônica de Enfermagem (Goiânia): 2012. p. 68-76, v.14, n.1. Disponível em URL: <. http://www.fen.ufg.br/revista/v14/n1/v14n1a08.htm.>
– Lei 5991. Dispõe sobre o Controle Sanitário do Comércio de Drogas, Medicamentos, Insumos Farmacêuticos e Correlatos, e dá outras Providências. 1973, dez 17. DOU,1 ( 1973, dez 21)
- Schenkel, EP. Cuidado com os medicamentos. Porto Alegre: UFRGS, 1991.
- Castro, KRTR. de. Os juízes diante da judicialização da saúde: o NAT como instrumento de aperfeiçoamento das decisões judiciais na área da saúde. Rio de Janeiro, Fundação Getúlio Vargas. Mestrado Profissional em Poder Judiciário; 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP RESPONSIBILITY
Title of the manuscript:
________________________________________________________
1. Statement of responsability
I certify that I have participated in the work above specified and take public responsibility for its content.
I certify that the manuscript represents an original work and that none of the material in the manuscript has been previously published, is included in another manuscript, or is currently under consideration for publication elsewhere, whether in printed form or in electronic media, except that described in the attachment.
In case of acceptance of this text by Demetra: Alimentação, Nutrição & Saude, I declare to be in accordance with the policy of public access and copyright adopted by Demetra, which provides as follows: (a) the authors retain the copyright and grant to the Journal the right of first publication, the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal; (b) authors are authorized to enter additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal; and (c) authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work.
2. Conflict of Interest Statement
I certify that there is no conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Date, signature and full address of all authors.
